LEVELS RISING
Levels of truancy are rising among
teenagers and ministers are disappointed that
highly publicised initiatives against truancy,
including the threat of prison for parents whose
children regularly skip lessons, seem to have
failed.
Research, by Mori for the Youth Justice Board in
192 schools, found 26% of young people had
"bunked off" for a least one day,
compared with 22% in 2003 and 2002.
A criminal justice source said, "The
Government has made a song and dance about the
issue, but these results show it has had a
miserable impact." |
NEW
OFFENCE
Ruth Kelly, the Education Secretary,
said the Government would create an offence of
allowing a child to be found in a public
place during school hours without good
cause as part of a toughening of
disciplinary powers for head teachers.
Parents will have to ensure that their children
are supervised at home for the first five days of
any suspension. They will be prosecuted for
refusal to pay fixed penalty fines resulting from
children being stopped in shopping centres or on
the streets.
Local authorities and schools would be required
to provide for pupils education from the
sixth day of any exclusion instead of the present
15 days. (Source: Times Online) |
BREAKING THE LAW
The High Court ruled that parents are
breaking the law if they take their children out
of school for holidays during term without the
permission of the head teacher. Lord Justice Auld
and Mr Justice Sullivan said schools, not
parents, must decide whether children can be
withdrawn from lessons for holidays or other
family activities. They declared that parents can
face a criminal conviction if they remove
children in defiance of a schools wishes.
(Source: Times Online, Mar/06) |
|
|
TRUANCY
Derby College is
using a text messaging sytem to fight truancy and improve
communication with 2,500 students with the aim of
improving the college retention rate by 1%. Under the
scheme, students who do not show up for class will be
sent a text message if they do not show up within 30
minutes of the lesson starting. A message will be sent to
the parents or guardian of any students who are under 18
- if they fail to respond. Some students have expressed
concerns about the Big Brother aspect of the system - and
say they do not like the idea of being
"watched" all the time.
But the college says the idea is to provide more
information to the students in a convenient fashion. The
college will use text messages to tell students and
parents about day-to-day college information such as
timetable details, assignment due dates, parents'
evenings and college events. The students or parents will
be able to respond to messages and explain any absences -
either before or after class. This information will be
automatically forwarded to the appropriate tutor who will
follow it up.
The college, which has 27,000 students across three
sites, plans to encourage student co-operation by
offering incentives such as free ring tones. It will also
congratulate learners on their achievements. Students who
do not have their own phones may be supplied with one
under the programme, but almost 95% of students already
have one, the college says. Derby College will finance
the scheme with a £230,000 grant from the Treasury that
is offered for innovative initiatives to enhance public
services.
"If we contact a student or carer on the same day of
the absence then we've got a much better chance of
identifying a problem and resolving it," says Graham
Golding, head of research at Derby College. "It has
an inclusive, student-centred approach, which involves
students in the design process and enables them to tailor
the service - in consultation with their mentor - through
a personal web page. The messaging system will start with
a pilot involving business students in February 2004, and
a final roll-out is expected in September 2004.
Parents caught with
a child out of school could face an on-the-spot fine of
up to £100. A government consultation proposes fixed
penalty notices of between £25 and £100 if the children
are out of their classes without permission. The fines
could be imposed by head teachers, police or council
officers in England. The plans are meant as an instant
reinforcement for existing laws which can mean parents
being jailed for three months. Official statistics show
that more than a fifth of England's secondary school
students (21%) are absent from school without permission
at some point in the year, on average for 15 half-day
school sessions.
Fifteen per cent of primary school pupils were away, for
eight half days on average. The government estimates that
about 50,000 children truant every day, and those picked
up on "truancy sweeps" are often with their
parents. Failure to secure regular school attendance of a
registered pupil is already a criminal offence for
parents. They can face fines of £2,500 each or three
months in jail. The government wants the fixed penalties
to work as a quick "sharp reminder" to parents
of their responsibilities. Recently, more parents have
been sent to jail over truancy in an attempt to crack
down on the problem.
PROPOSED TRUANCY FINES
£25 - Parent agrees absence
unauthorised and pays in 14 days
£50 - Parent does not agree absence
was unauthorised and pays in 14 days or Parent agrees
absence was unauthorised and pays in 28 days
£100 - Parent does not agree
absence was unauthorised and pays in 28 days
England's top education official has blamed
parents and head teachers for the Government's failure to
stop children skipping school. Sir David Normington,
permanent secretary at the Department for Education and
Skills, said it was "very disappointing"
truancy rates had not reduced. But some head teachers
were failing to apply strict rules on school absence
while too many parents condoned their children's truancy,
he said.
Recently, the National Audit Office savaged Sir David's
department for failing to reduce truancy rates despite
spending £885million on improving behaviour and cutting
absence. Sir David told the Commons Public Accounts
Committee, "It is important to reduce all absence
because absence is very much correlated with poor
performance in schools. It's very important within that
to try to reduce unauthorised absence and I accept that
the figures are very disappointing in that regard."
In 2002, the DfES was set the target of cutting
unauthorised absence, which includes truancy, by 10% but
by 2003-04 the rate was unchanged. Sir David said,
"We know that quite a lot of truants who are not in
schools are with their parents, it's condoned by their
parents." Some of these pupils are looking after
their younger siblings at home, he said. Some head
teachers also fail to implement tough policies, including
the threat of legal action, calling parents as soon as a
child is missing and putting enough money into developing
a clear policy.
Parents wanting to take their children on
holiday in term-time could face fines and even court
action under a new system being introduced in Derby
primary schools. Head teachers are being asked to judge
whether or not pupils should be given time out during
term using a points system. If the number of points
accrued exceeds eight, head teachers will have the right
to refuse to authorise the holiday. Failure to comply
could result in parents being fined up to £100 per
child.
Until now, parents were supposed to have filled in a form
to apply for a child's absence and head teachers were
able to make their own judgement. In reality, most
absences were allowed and become authorised. In the new
system, the points are set against certain criteria such
as current school attendance and the proximity of tests
and examinations, but mitigating circumstances, such as
long-term illness, can result in points being subtracted.
One point is given if the holiday would be taken more
than 16 weeks away from exams. During exams, it is an
eight-point penalty. Four points will be given if pupils
miss between 30 and 20% of lessons a year. If parents
disregard a head teacher's decision, the city council
would issue a £50 penalty notice for failing to ensure
that a child attends school on a regular basis. If this
is not paid within 28 days, the penalty is increased to
£100, payable after 42 days, and failure to pay will
result in the case being placed before a magistrates'
court. (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Dec/06)
Next >>>
|
|
|