TRUE
CASES
A
teen yob walked free from court, with his 96th
conviction. The 16 year old was found guilty of
affray for lunging at a cop with a glass. He has
broken an Anti-Social Behaviour Order 17 TIMES.
But Nottingham magistrates gave him a years
supervision order. They said: Custody would
be a backward step. |
| A Newcastle Crown Court
jury convicted a man of shoplifting after he
stole a 92p tin of spaghetti bolognese from a
supermarket - at a cost to the taxpayer of around
£8,500. Blyth Valley Labour MP Ronnie Campbell
said, "The thousands it has cost the
taxpayer makes it laughable, but the unfunny
thing is taxpayers having to pick up the bill.
This case highlights the stupidity of the law the
way it stands." |
| A convict won £75,000
damages from his local authority in Bolton, after
blaming his delinquent behaviour as a teenager on
the council's failure to send him to the right
school when he was nine. |
| A prisoner was given
permission to sue the Prison Service for
neglegence after he injured himself trying to
escape. |
| A pub landlady, found
guilty of a public order offence, was fined £580
for displaying a football scarf with the words
'Sunderland are Shite' above the bar in her pub. |
| A bus driver was sacked and
fined £300 for kerb-crawling in his
double-decker. He tried to buy sex as he returned
to the depot after finishing his shift but the
woman he propositioned was an undercover
policewoman posing as a hooker. |
| A 12-year-old boy was
finally sentenced at Cardiff Youth Court to six
months in custody. He had previously appeared in
court more than 150 times. He pleaded guilty to
breaking previous bail conditions and allowing
himself to be carried in a stolen vehicle. He had
previously been convicted by magistrates of
burgling a 15-year-old schoolgirl's home after he
tricked his way into her home, where he stole the
keys to the family car. The youngster later
returned to the house and took the car from the
drive of the house. He was placed under a
supervision order for three years for that
offence and more than 20 others including taking
cars. |
|
|
SENTENCING
Page 1 | 2 | 3
Hit-and-run driver, Gary Hall, who drank 14
pints then mowed down two people walked free from court.
Hall was doing handbrake skids when he twice ploughed
into a group of people, then hurled abuse at his victims
as he sped off. He admitted dangerous driving, having
excess alcohol and two assault charges but claimed not to
remember the incident.
Judge John Evans called it "lunatic driving",
said it was a miracle nobody was killed and said Hall
"richly deserved" jail. Astonishingly he let
him off with a one-year suspended term, claiming the yob
showed remorse and was of good character. He also
received a two-year ban and four-month curfew. (Source: Daily Mirror, Jun/06)
Eleven-year-old Chelsea Williams suffered
horrific burns when a 13-year-old boy threw boiling water
over her in a water pistol fight, but he will not face
charges. The boy, who was on the losing team in the water
fight, told Chelsea, "I'm going to get some water
from the kettle." He let it boil, then put in a tiny
amount of cold water before throwing it over her back.
She ran screaming in agony to a friend's house. She was
put under a cold shower and then rushed to hospital.
Chelsea needed skin grafts during four days in a
specialist burns unit in Salisbury, Wilts, and has been
told to stay out of the sun for at least a year. But the
Crown Prosecution Service has ruled the teenager should
be let off with a "final warning". John Revell,
Dorset's chief crown prosecutor, said, "Having
examined all the evidence we were satisfied he had no
idea his actions could cause such harm and absolutely no
intention of causing such injuries." (Source: Daily Mirror, May/06)
A mother took her toddler son to court after
officials refused to accept they had made a mistake by
charging him for speeding. Lawyers, court officials and
police fell about laughing when 16-month-old Jay Mack
appeared at Glasgow Sheriff Court and tried to climb into
the sheriff's chair. His £208 speeding fine was
immediately cancelled and court officers have launched an
inquiry to discover how the case got so far. It all
started when a man caught speeding in Essex in July gave
police the false name of Jay Mack. A computer search by
court officials turned up only one Jay Mack in the UK,
and the little lad from Priesthill near Glasgow, was
issued with a £40 speeding fine.
His bewildered mum Mary, 34, phoned the
magistrates court in Essex to tell them they had the
wrong Jay Mack. But court officials wouldn't believe her,
and continued to send letters demanding payment of the
fine. Several deadlines for the payment passed, and the
fine showballed to £208.33. Jay was then warned he would
face arrest if he failed to appear at a fines hearing at
Glasgow Sheriff Court. Officials first tried to stop Jay
from entering the court, as he was wearing reins and was
very wobbly on his feet. But the family was ushered
inside when they found out he was the one appearing.
Labour councillor Gregory Vincent, who
worked as former sports minister Tony Banks agent
at the last election, spent hours trawling for pictures
of young girls being abused. One showed a naked
ten-year-old being assaulted as she wore a dog collar and
had her hands tied behind her back and fixed to a beam.
Vincent built up a library of internet video clips over
six months. The victims were as young as eight. But Judge
Christopher Hardy decided to go easy on the dad-of-one
after hearing he committed his crimes because he was
depressed and bored. The judge told him, This was
very unpleasant material but by no means the worst kind
the courts see from time to time. The possession of this
material is the result, as you put it, of depression and
boredom rather than perversion.
Vincent, who was also a school governor, was given a
two-year community rehabilitation order. Southwark Crown
Court in London heard he had lost his £24,000-a-year job
as adminstrator at the University of London. He had also
resigned as a councillor and is no longer a school
governor. The court heard he trawled the internet from
his office at the university, using the log-on Heebee
Jeebee in a bid to disguise his past-time. But he was
rumbled by a specialist team of Scotland Yard officers
who used sophisticated software to track down
paedophiles. When he realised police were on to him,
Vincent deleted all his files to cover his tracks but
officers were still able to retrieve them.
A blunder by judges allowed Britain's
biggest conman to keep £33 million he swindled from
vulnerable pensioners. Fraudster John
"Goldfinger" Palmer had the money seized after
being jailed for eight years for a bogus Tenerife
timeshare scam. Palmer's slick salesmen ripped off an
estimated 17,000 victims - many of them pensioners who
lost their life savings hoping to enjoy their retirement
in a holiday home in the sun. After being jailed for
eight years at the Old Bailey and losing his cash, Palmer
ordered his lawyers to go to the Court of Appeal in July
2002 over a £33,243,812 confiscation order and the cash
was given back on the basis that there had been crucial
flaws in the procedure followed. Lord Woolf, the Lord
Chief Justice, ruled that the court had
"misunderstood and misapplied" the law and
Palmer's case had been "wrongly decided".
But Palmer will still keep his cash. Appeal judges
blocked an attempt by the Director of Public Prosecutions
to take the case to the House of Lords - the only court
with power to quash the ruling. As a result they cannot
overturn the decision to quash the confiscation order -
so Palmer will keep the proceeds from the crime. Norman
Brennan, a serving police officer and director of the
Victims of Crime Trust, said, "Who has got any faith
left in the British criminal justice system? Who said
crime doesn't pay? It's never paid so well for Palmer. A
lot of vulnerable people, who worked hard all their lives
lost their life savings and at the end of the day his
sentence, eight years, was not that long anyway."
Palmer, in Belmarsh Prison, south London, is now the
richest category A high security inmate in prison
history.
A man won a £200 damages claim against a doctor he says
gave him a cold. He filed the claim at Salisbury County
Court and was awarded £200 minimum damages when the
doctor and Salisbury District Hospital failed to respond
in 14 days. However, at a further hearing behind closed
doors at Salisbury County Court the claim was dismissed.
He was ordered to pay £750 costs plus VAT to the
hospital and £50 court costs.
|
|
|