BRITAIN'S
WORST FATHER
After fathering eight children by eight mothers,
Keith Macdonald might have done enough to put
women off him for life.
But despite his appalling track record, the
25-year-old is expecting a ninth and tenth, by
two more women.
As most of the mothers and children are largely
dependent on benefits, they are likely to cost
the taxpayer £1.5million by the time all the
children are 16.
Unemployed Macdonald, described as Britains
worst father, had his first child at the age of
15 and has abandoned every one.
When his latest offspring are born he will have
fathered ten children by ten mothers in only ten
years. And there have even been claims from two
former girlfriends that he may have fathered a
further four.
Macdonald, who lives on £44 a week income
support and wakes up with a can of lager each
morning, contributes just £5 a week to their
upkeep.
He met many of the mothers of his children at bus
stops and bus stations, and says it is
easy to find women this way.
He first became a father at the age of 15 when
his then girlfriend, gave birth to his daughter.
Another mother of one of his children said,
"Men like him should be made to have a
vasectomy or be fined or even jailed."
She gets £2.50 a fortnight from Macdonald
through the Child Support Agency. The mothers are
entitled to jobseekers allowance, income
support,child tax credit and child benefit. Most
also get housing benefit. (Source: Daily Mail, Sep/10) |
|
|
BENEFIT SCROUNGERS
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Pete and Sam Smith don't need jobs. Instead
they just work the system, pulling in a staggering
£95,000 a year in state benefits. The huge handout
package, five times the starting salary for a
schoolteacher, includes a rent-free four-bedroom house,
daily breakfast delivered to the door and enough spare
cash to keep five pets pampered in a cattery. But
mum-of-ten Sam, still moans. Their home is too small, the
breakfast portions too mean and Britain's mad benefits
culture only allows her enough cash to buy the kids one
Nintendo Wii games console!
She said, "It's very cramped here and we've been
told we might not be given a new house for another nine
months, which is ridiculous. And the breakfast supplied
by the council isn't like proper hot food. It's usually
eggs, beans, tinned tomatoes and cereal, which isn't
really enough for us all and we have to heat it up
ourselves." The Smiths were moved into the property
in Kingswood, Bristol, by the local authority a month ago
after being evicted from a house in Bath which the
landlord claimed they had wrecked.
The couple have not worked since Pete quit the Army in
2001 to care for Sam, who suffers curvature of the spine,
and their three kids. Nevertheless, Sam has been well
enough to give birth to seven more and now enjoys £140 a
week child benefits thanks to her happy brood of 10, aged
from 14 years down to four months. Along with disability
living allowance, carer's allowance, tax credits and
income support, that brings the family's cash handouts to
an incredible £44,954. But Sam's not satisfied. She
said, "It's not really that much money we get. It's
certainly not enough for all of us. By the time we pay
for food, clothes, electricity and £100 a week for the
cattery, we don't have much left. It's tough."
A spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions
admitted, "The current system is broken. That's why
we're reforming it to ensure work pays and we get people
off benefits and into jobs." A representative of
Bath and North East Somerset Council said they had a
legal duty to rehouse the homeless children and the
£950-a-week bed-and-breakfast deal is just a
"temporary" arrangement, adding, "Due to
the size of this family there are very limited
options." (Source: News of the World, Sep/10)
Residents are petitioning to have Jane and
Lee Houghton, their five youngest children and a grandson
evicted. But with a new bathroom and kitchen on its way,
paid for by the council, and a house filled with numerous
games consoles, computers and TVs they have no intention
of moving. And Mr Houghton insisted they need more than
the £20,000 a year they get. He is paid £150 a month
disability allowance because he has a 'personality
disorder' which makes him 'kick off in crowds'. He has
not worked since 1999 and says drinking alcohol helps him
cope with his condition.
He has been threatened with an Asbo for violent behaviour
as well as being drunk and disorderly and has 24 previous
convictions. The comfortable lifestyle of the Houghton
family is funded by benefits including £640 income
support, £212 carer's allowance a month as well as Mr
Houghton's £150 disability allowance. Their four-bedroom
semi-detached house in Crawley, West Sussex, is paid for
by housing benefit. The Houghtons boast about spending
£1,000 on each of their children at Christmas. They have
seven children and their eldest daughter has her own
council home.
Mrs Houghton said, "I only get carer's allowance
because my 16-year-old daughter Chelsea has ADHD. We get
disability allowance for Lee too because of his
personality disorder, but we should get more. They've
even stopped giving me child benefit for Chelsea because
she's a mum now, yet they won't give her a council house
until she's 18, it's so unfair! We only get £150 a month
disability allowance for Lee, which isn't enough. His
personality disorder makes him really moody so he should
get more." The couple have been together since Mr
Houghton was 17 and his wife was 14.
They had their first child Lee, now aged 23, a year
later, followed by Emma, 20, James, 18, Chelsea Ann
Stamford Bridge, 16, named after Mr Houghton's favourite
football team and their home ground, Joanne, 14, Jack,
ten, and Summer, two. They share their home with their
five youngest children and Chelsea's son Dion, ten
months. Emma lives with three-year-old daughter Chanelle
in her own council home. Their only child with a job is
eldest son Lee, who works as a cleaner. They've got a
computer and a laptop, four TVs, two Xboxes, three DVD
players and we've all got mobile phones.
The Houghtons moved to their current home in 2001 after
being evicted from their previous house for failing to
pay the rent, despite receiving housing benefit which
covered it. They freely admit they 'did it on purpose' as
they wanted a new home. Mrs Houghton said, "We made
up some bullshit about Lee chucking me out as we knew if
we played the game I'd get another house." Since
moving in, the family has made the lives of their
neighbours hell, blasting out loud music from their home,
while Mr Houghton drunkenly falls over in the street and
rides his motorbike on the pavement.
His previous convictions are mainly for drink-related
offences, such as swearing at police officers and
shouting abuse at people in the street but he insists it
is his family who are being picked on. He said,
"We've had enough of being branded thugs. We're a
good family. The old woman opposite us was always
watching my kids out of her window and moaning about them
being loud. About ten of our neighbours signed her
petition. Drinking helps me cope with my personality
disorder. I start with a bottle of Jack Daniels then have
a few cans of cider. If people want to work, good for
them. I would if I could, but I'm too ill." (Source:
Daily Mail, May/10)
Francesca
Walker receives more than £90,000 a year in benefits to
pay the rent on £2.6m five-bed villa, plus other
payouts. Her four-storey home boasts five bedrooms, three
bathrooms, a double living room, study and roof terrace.
Miss Walker said, "All my life Ive lived in
overcrowded flats on estates with gangs that kicked our
door in and harassed my children. We lived in some
hellholes. One stank so badly we couldnt use two
rooms. Another had a gas leak that made my children
ill."
Miss Walker, whose children range from five to 16, was
given the house because a new rule introduced by the
Government in April forces Kensington and Chelsea council
to fund suitable homes for large families. None of the
available council houses was big enough, so the local
authority pays for her to rent from a private landlord.
Miss Walker admitted the move, in September, had caused
a lot of jealousy.
She said, "My best friend accused me of swallowing
up everything the world has to offer and becoming
materialistic. I didnt ask to be here. Id
rather have a job and an ordinary house than be trapped
in a Catch-22 situation where going to work will actually
make me worse off because I can never make enough to pay
the rent. Now that I am here, Im not going to
pretend it isnt great. Its amazing to have so
much space and not to have nine of us queuing to use one
bathroom in the morning."
The council said, "We could not give Miss Walker a
property outside the borough because her children go to
local schools." Miss Walker gets £15,000 a year in
benefits in addition to the £91,260 rent paid by the
Government via the council to the landlord's agency,
Foxtons. She has two 42in flat-screen TVs, a computer and
a clutch of expensive-looking sofas and Ottoman beds. The
house does not feel sparsely appointed, as some might
expect, given that she's meant to be living on the
poverty line and it was rented 'unfurnished'. (Source: Daily Mail, May/10)
A jobless couple with ten kids would have to
earn £67,000 a year to match what they get from the
state. Sue and Pete Davison, who haven't had a job
between them since 1997, want to work. But our handouts
culture pays them nearly £45,000 a year. Meanwhile it's
tax paid by the average worker, earning just £25,428,
which foots that bill. Pete last worked 13 years ago when
he was made redundant from a factory job. He said,
"At the same time Sue was in a bus crash and became
unwell so I started to care for her and the kids. But I
am ready to get back to work. There just aren't the jobs
at a salary which would it beneficial. I can't work in
McDonald's for little more than minimum wage."
At their four-bedroom council maisonette in Doncaster,
South Yorkshire, mum Sue admitted, "People might say
we're only having kids for the benefits. But that's
nonsense. I'd always wanted a large family and we have
very little money at all left over. The house isn't
dripping with mobile phones and computers. I have a
laptop which the kids fight over to help with their
homework. Our weekly food bill is often £300. Pete likes
the odd glass of beer but he doesn't go to the pub. I
might take the kids to the pictures but we go early when
it's cheaper. We have days out to the seaside and picnics
rather than holidays. If we had loads of money we'd be
living in a big house but that's not the case."
She added, "Everything goes on feeding and clothing
the kids plus household bills. Our one luxury is the
£35-a-month Sky TV." The family's current tax-free
handouts include £76-a-week housing benefit, their £700
council tax bill, £390-a-week child tax credits, child
benefit of £104 a week and school meals to the tune of
£63 a week. Pete gets income support of £80 a week but
ironically the family is financially better off since Sue
sadly lost a leg this year after complications following
a fall at a leisure centre. Pete is now her full-time
carer with a weekly allowance of £53, while Sue gets
£97 a week in disability payments. It all adds up to
£44,820, they'd have to earn £67,000 gross to take that
home after tax. (Source: News of the World, Aug/10)
<<< Prev
|
|
|