OUR
FAULT
In an attempt to protect itself from the
inevitable flak that will result from the
violation of this land by one of the ugly
monuments to council ineptitude that will end up
there, they make us pick one, but being the best
doesn't make it good. In the years to come, they
will be able to say to us: "What are you
moaning about? You picked it."
I get the feeling that those in charge of the
council's planning department do not like Derby,
they have no interest in any consistency in its
appearance or any assets that it currently
possesses. It's time that the council realised
that they are public servants and we, all of us,
are members of the public. Paul
Grosse |
FUNDS
SECURED
Derby City Council has agreed in
principle to fund part of the £9.8m Quad
project. But one proviso was added, that the
cabinet should allow all 51 councillors to have
the opportunity to endorse the decision,
following further consultation with those
concerned about the relocation of the site's
Korean War memorial and the memorial and sensory
gardens.
Councillor Philip Hickson, deputy leader of the
council, warned, "It's important that the
council doesn't offer a blank cheque to the
project. I've been sceptical about whether or not
the city could afford the scheme but I think, on
balance, we should offer it qualified
support."
Quad has secured almost £3m from the Arts
Council and expects a further £1.9m from other
sources, including the European Union. The
council's own financial input will depend upon
what is offered by the East Midlands Development
Agency.
That sum is expected to be between £1.8m and
£3.1m. Tory councillor Balbir Samra was the only
cabinet dissenter. "If I was a tax payer in
the city, I'd expect my council to spend £2m a
bit more wisely," he said. |
|
|
DERBY CITYSCAPE
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
The city council admitted that it is almost
£5m short of the £12.5m needed for the proposed Quad
building. Explaining where the shortfall in funding has
come from, Council leader Maurice Burgess said, "I
think there has been some misconception between the East
Midlands Development Agency and the Derby and Derbyshire
Economic Partnership as to how much money was going to
come in."
It was later revealed that the shortfall was closer to
£10m. Jonathan Guest, development and cultural services
director, said the only funding the council could
guarantee was £2.5m from the Arts Council.
He added, "If it can't be built in its present form,
in my opinion there's a new opportunity for it in another
building. We've looked very clearly at the facility
aspects and we've been very aware of the feelings of many
people. They have felt that having a building that would
cut off the Market Place wouldn't be what many people in
the city wanted. We haven't closed the door to the
development but, at this point, we have to look very
carefully."
Deputy leader Councillor Philip Hickson said, "We've
always been very clear that, whatever happens, the Quad
should not become a financial burden on the taxpayers of
the city and, although the scheme is an exciting one, we
don't want something that's going to become an expensive
drain on council tax. The current funding as it appears
to us casts enormous doubt if the project will
happen."
Councillor Burgess said the consortium had been expecting
separate amounts of money from EMDA and the DDEP, which
members believed were independent funding sources.
However, EMDA funds the DDEP, so only one amount will be
forthcoming.
He said, "As the DDEP is set up by EMDA there does
appear to have been some possible misunderstanding by the
financial advisers for the consortium, who had assumed
that the DDEP and EMDA were bringing in separate money,
and what EMDA has pointed out is that DDEP is the same
money."
Peter Mount, development director for the Quad
Consortium, said, "We've not managed to raise the
funding level so far as the full scheme. We're not £5m
down, but we're down enough to look at other options, one
of which is to put the centre in the Market Place but on
a smaller scale."
The latest option is to use St Helen's House. St Helen's
House Trust is a charitable trust set up to restore and
run St Helen's House to provide educational, vocational,
cultural and recreational facilities. The trust plans to
take over responsibility for St Helen's House from Derby
City Council.
Trustee of St Helen's House Peter Steer said, "We've
not had an opportunity to speak to any of the people
involved in Quad, but we're trying to do that at the
moment. We do know that Q Arts work fits in with our
basic philosophy of education and leisure use but we
don't know if we would have room for Metro. We're in the
very early stages but we would be delighted to discuss
this."
Other possible locations include the Roundhouse in Pride
Park and the Metro Cinema in Green Lane. Mr Burgess said,
"These three buildings will form part of the options
appraisal and it could be that one of our listed
buildings could be the new arts centre." But if
these buildings are now being considered, their merits
must have existed before the Quad plan in the Market
Place was proposed.
The city
council wants to build it in front of the Market Hall, on
the site of the Sir Peter Hilton Memorial Garden and the
Korean War veterans' memorial, in Corporation Street. The
garden, dedicated to the former Lord Lieutenant of
Derbyshire, cost the council £500,000 to build in 1996
and would possibly be relocated in the Market Place.
War veterans who fought for years to get a memorial in
Derby have vowed to fight on to ensure it is not pushed
aside by the planned Quad arts centre. The consortium
behind Quad, Derby's proposed £9.8m visual arts centre,
wants to build the centre in Corporation Street, in front
of the Market Hall. It would mean a sensory garden, built
in memory of the late Sir Peter Hilton, and the Korean
War Memorial, would have to be moved. Both Lady Winifred
Hilton, Sir Peter's widow, and Derby and Burton branch of
the British Korean Veterans' Association opposed the
move.
The veterans have now come out and said they are prepared
"to do battle" with the council over the future
of the memorial gardens. They want the gardens and the
memorial to remain together. Keith Challis, chairman of
the association, said, "We shall fight. We're war
veterans and we know how to fight. To destroy the garden
would be a betrayal of trust and an insult to every
serviceman and servicewoman that had served their country
that came from Derbyshire and East Staffordshire."
Mr Challis said his group was due to meet soon with
council officials and would put its concerns across. He
added, "Our aim has always been to keep the memorial
and the gardens together in one place. We'll listen to
what the council has to say but we'll be looking for some
sort of guarantee before this is allowed to go
ahead." War hero Sir Peter Hilton was the former
Lord Lieutenant of Derbyshire and he was president of
Derbyshire Royal British Legion when he died in 1995.
Plans to build it in the Market Place were shelved
following funding problems and criticism from Derby
residents about the proposed design and location. In a
poll on the Evening Telegraph's website 84.4% of visitors
voted in favour of the new Quad proposals. Councillor
Paul West, city council cabinet member for leisure and
cultural services, said, "It's an endorsement that
we're on the right track and that people want the visual
arts centre."
But, in the words which appear on the war memorial, he
said, "Nobody will be forgotten". He added,
"We're bending over backwards to work with various
groups so we can come to a satisfactory solution. We
certainly don't want to start splitting up the garden
from the memorial, we want to keep them together. There
are various site options being considered."
|
|
|