LAUGHING
STOCK
When are we going to stop these mindless
councillors from ruining our city? Since when has
199 out of 750 people been a good percentage of
over a quarter of a million people? They state
the Quad will contribute to the dynamism of urban
life. All it will do is make us a laughing stock.
When are these people going to realise that we
put them there and they ought to take notice of
what we, the real public, want? G. H.
Kirkland |
MONSTROSITY
The building proposed for Derby Market
Place is a ghastly monstrosity. It has no
character, it is far too big, it is built of the
wrong materials and is in the wrong place.
I do not understand how architects can have so
little feel for the character of the surrounding
area and have the effrontery to put forward a
hideous, characterless box, which any
five-year-old could have drawn in two minutes -
and free of charge.
One wonders if they have ever been to the site or
merely drew (one could hardly describe it as
designed) the building in a darkened room with no
knowledge of where it was meant to be built. The
best view from the Market Place is the view to
the Council House.
The proposed location creates a sense of
claustrophobia in an area which now has an open
feel. The Assembly Rooms ruined the character of
that side of the Market Place but, if a further
building has to be erected, it should be attached
to the Assembly Rooms to retain the view to the
Council House. Alan MacMaster |
|
|
DERBY CITYSCAPE
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Work to improve the appearance of the
Morledge in Derby has got under way and boards showing
people how the area will look in a year's time when the
improvements have finished will go on display outside the
courthouse building. Alongside them will be samples of
materials that will be used to create the new footways,
including the natural stone paving. The works are part of
the Derby City Council and Derby Cityscape programme to
improve public open spaces. The overall cost of that
public realm programme is estimated to be in excess of
£30m during the next 10 years.
The majority of the funding is being provided by the city
council. The designs for the Morledge were shaped by
suggestions from the public at consultation events which
were held last year. Councillor Hilary Jones, leader of
Derby City Council, said, "The proposed improvements
will enhance one of the city's busiest thoroughfares. The
information board and sample materials give the public an
opportunity to see what the area could look like."
(Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Dec/09)
Councillors are blamed for faulty decisions
such as the design for Quad but, surely, the blame lies
elsewhere. Councillors are advised by officials and such
advice can be poor, narrow in scope, even biased and the
judgement on that is evidenced from the result. So what
of Quad?
The elevations look like advertising hoardings covered
with bad graffiti. It may be the latest
"with-it" two-dimensional architectural fashion
but in a few years' time it will look tired, rusty, out
of date and do even less to enhance that dysfunctional
entity which is the Market Place. How many thousands of
pounds has been wasted by officials on how many schemes
for the Five Lamps and it still doesn't work?
Bureaucrats told councillors that Brightstar SWERF was
the way to treat rubbish, but that could be jeopardised
through lack of finance, never mind the fact that it is
environmentally wrong, and that leaves Derby at risk of
failing to meet Government waste disposal targets.
Those were the officials who wanted to drive a road over
Bass Rec, have committed Derby to the over-development of
the Cockpit Island/Bus Station/River Gardens site and,
for some obscure reason, have insisted that the agreement
they made with Metro-Holst remains a secret.
The people of Derby should ask how the decisions of
Messrs Cowlishaw, Foote, Guest and Co remain outside the
normal constraints of openness which even politicians
have to observe. The historic Roundhouse is to become a
college because of their lack of vision, yet Pete
Waterman and the Flying Scot could, even now, be
attracting tourists to a railway museum there if those
same officials hadn't been too cute for Derby's good.
Derby is omitted from tourist guides and sometimes
referred to as a "town". There is nobody else
to blame. Graham Buckler
A £6.5m project to build flats on the edge
of the Railway Conservation Area in Carrington Street,
which has received a £1.1m grant from the Housing
Corporation, will include 53 one and two-bedroom homes in
five-storey and six-storey buildings. The Housing
Corporation is a Government agency that funds low-cost
housing and regulates housing associations in England.
Developer Kingswater Group was granted planning
permission by Derby City Council for the scheme, despite
objections from the city's Conservation Areas Advisory
Committee.
Derby Cityscape is currently asking people about its
proposals for 1,700 flats and houses in the area between
Bass's Rec, Traffic Street and London Road, and a further
1,300 homes on the site of Derbyshire Royal Infirmary. As
part of the project, the former Rutland Arms, on the
corner of Carrington Street and Nelson Street, will be
demolished and used to house an extension to Churnet
House, an office building in Carrington Street, close to
the post office depot in Midland Road.
Derby Cityscape chief executive John Cadwallader said,
"Development of the plans for this scheme follows
two years of working closely with the developers and
architects to present a suitable scheme for a sensitive
development within the Railway Conservation area. The new
residential community will bring life and vitality to an
area in need of regeneration." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, May/06)
As I see it, the objections are threefold:
the design of the building and its impact on the Market
Place, its location and its name. My own view, for what
it is worth, is this: the arts centre is a great idea, it
would benefit Derby no end, but I would like to see the
space at the corner of the Market Place remain as it is.
It might appear windswept and desolate to some people,
especially in the depths of winter, but on beautiful days
in spring and summer, it's a proper little haven. So
where is the best place for it? There have been many
suggestions, such as St Helen's House, which would
certainly be a great setting. But I can see problems, not
least the addition to the already manic traffic situation
in that area.
Another suggestion, which is my favourite, is the
Roundhouse. That's the best use I can imagine for such a
historic building, plus, its location makes it readily
accessible, not only from the city centre but also the
A52, the A6 and, most importantly, the railway station.
As for the name "Quad", I must agree it sounds
more suitable as the title of an animated film than
something as exciting as this project. I did hear the
suggestion of "The Alan Bates Centre", which I
like very much. It would be a fitting tribute to an
outstanding artist and son of Derby.
We have already had moans from the city council, of
course, that any deviation from the original plans would
involve extra expense that we can't afford. Isn't it
strange that, only a short time ago, the same city
council was telling us that they wanted new council
offices and if the council was to stay in its current
buildings and upgrade them, it would cost £37.3m,
whereas moving would cost £41.5m.
So renovate our beautiful Aslin Council House, and put
some of the money saved to what the people of Derby
really want! John Hudson
|
|
|