TAX ON GRASS CUTTINGS
Millions of homeowners face a new "garden
tax" that will make them pay for the first
time to get rid of their grass cuttings.
Ministers are encouraging councils to charge
families £50 a year to take away lawn clippings,
leaves and prunings as part of the
Governments plans to force households to
recycle more of their rubbish.
Documents drawn up for ministers say that
homeowners need to compost far more of their
garden waste, but few are willing to do this so
they need to be encouraged by incentives or
penalties.
Many authorities which collect rubbish have no
charges for garden waste but these councils have
now been told that if they wish to keep their
garden collection service free, they will have to
absorb heavy costs or pile them on to council tax
bills.
A report by the Eunomia Consultancy, carried out
for the Waste and Resources Action Programme,
found that the typical English garden produces
8lb of grass cuttings per square yard every year.
(Source: Daily Mail, Jun/07) |
|
|
RECYCLING SCHEME
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Hundreds of
thousands of tons of material put out for recycling is
being secretly dumped in landfill sites by councils in
Britain. New figures reveal that while some householders
face stiff fines for breaching recycling laws, many
councils are simply dumping huge quantities of the paper,
glass and plastic they collect. In some areas one item in
every eight put out for recycling ends up being sent for
landfill or incinerated. Local authorities blamed
residents for putting the wrong rubbish in the wrong bin
or failing to clean the material they try to recycle.
If recycling is contaminated, the bags are
simply dumped anyway. The figures showed that 240,000
tons of material put out for recycling last year ended up
being dumped or burned. This is likely to be the tip of
the iceberg as almost half of all councils did not
release figures, including major authorities such as
Birmingham, Bradford, Hull and Warwickshire. In Test
Valley, in Hampshire, where the local council has hired
eight bin police to fine householders who put
out the wrong rubbish, it still secretly dumped 917 of
the 11,961 tons of recycling collected, almost one item
in every 12.
The Local Government Association said the amount rejected
was dwarfed by the 13 million tons recycled last year. A
separate set of Government figures showed that Britain
has imported 1,000 tons of waste from other EU countries
in the past two years to use in power stations, mostly
from Germany and Holland. (Source: Sunday Express, Mar/08)
Paper,
bottles and plastic that millions of householders are
being forced to recycle are routinely being dumped in
landfill sites. Recycling companies say they are
receiving tens of thousands of tons of materials from
councils which are so contaminated or badly sorted that
they have to be rejected or dumped. Many councils are
cutting corners to meet targets for recycling and instead
of being properly separated, the waste is poorly sorted
and sent to specialist recycling companies that cannot
then reprocess it.
Dick Searle, chief executive of the Packaging Federation,
said, The recycling infrastructure in this country
is disgraceful. Chris White, commercial manager at
the Kent-based company Aylesford Newsprint, which
recycles paper, said, I want paper. Im paying
for paper but we get plastic bags, plastic bottles, some
cans and textiles. I cant find an outlet for it and
it goes for landfill. David Workman,
director-general of British Glass, a trade association,
said the industry was being forced to send back bottles
and waste, which was then used as aggregate in roads or
sent for landfill.
A Sunday Times investigation found that:
A paper recycling company in Kent
is sending to landfill 9,000 tons a year of cans, bottles
and plastics. These have been mixed up with the paper and
the firm does not have the capability to process them.
Britains biggest glass
recycling company is sending tons of glass to roadfill
because it is so contaminated.
A Warrington-based aluminium
processor, regarded as a world leader in its field, is
regularly rejecting British waste because it is so poorly
sorted and is importing used cans from abroad.
Container loads of mixed
recyclable materials rejected by British companies are
unlawfully shipped abroad to be sorted in China, India
and Indonesia.
Some councils are already threatening householders with
fines if they do not recycle. Evidence shows that while
residents face tough action for not separating
recyclables from general rubbish, many councils are
operating seriously flawed schemes. Many cannot even
provide basic information on where or how the raw
materials they are collecting are being recycled. Glass
manufacturers are probably worst affected by the mixed
recycling collections. They say once clear glass has been
smashed and mixed with coloured glass and other materials
and waste, it cannot be used to make new bottles and jars
and is commonly used as road aggregate or sent for
landfill. (Source: Times Online, Jun/07)
Families will
have to sort their rubbish into at least five recycling
bins on their doorstep or face penalties under new
government plans. It proposes radical changes to the way
households deal with their rubbish that will require many
to alter their habits, or pay more if they refuse. David
Miliband will bring in measures to ensure fortnightly
collections are not brought in without residents having a
say. And councils will be barred from introducing a 'pay
as you throw' waste tax.
Key points include:
Households will have to separate
their waste into at least five different categories, such
as paper, cardboard, plastic, glass and food scraps.
Cash refunds for families who
recycle of up to £50 but similar penalties for those who
refuse.
Exemptions for vulnerable groups,
including pensioners, the disabled and large families on
low incomes.
A ban on
councils using their recycling schemes to make money.
Suitable bins to be provided by
the council free of charge.
Mr Miliband said that local authorities should aim to
collect food waste separately and on a weekly basis and
if they cannot collect it separately, they should still
stick to a weekly collection. He is now looking at ways
of giving voters a say if a council wants to switch to a
fortnightly collection, although plans are still being
drawn up as to how this would work. Councils will be
allowed, on a voluntary basis, to offer a "carrot
and stick" approach to recycling. Households which
comply could get an annual pay out of up to £50 based on
how much they recycle.
However, councils who take part in the scheme will have
to find a way to measure how much is being thrown out, by
for example, having computer chips in bins. The scheme
would be paid for by penalties on those who refuse to
take part and savings to local authorities on the cost of
burying waste in landfills. Other schemes councils might
introduce include issuing households with a fixed number
of refuse sacks each year, and giving them a refund if
they use fewer or charging them for extra bags if they
need more.
The government estimates that at least two out of every
three households in England, roughly 17million, will be
better off. For the first time councils will be allowed
to offer financial incentives to reward families who make
the effort to recycle, but will have to heed strict
minimum conditions. Local authorities will be
specifically barred from making money from the scheme,
which will have to pay for itself. (Source: Daily Mail, May/07)
<<< Prev
|
|
|