--------------Main Menu


Immigrants - Health
By James Seadon

A report recently revealed that Newham, in the East End of London, is the tuberculosis capital of the western world. Its TB rate is double that of India. The increase of asylum seeking and immigration into our already overcrowded cities has reintroduced a disease commonly known as 'the white plague' endangering the lives of thousands in the process. The reluctance of the authorities to confront the truth, which could cause an epidemic posing a terrifying threat to the nation's health, has led to some experts breaking ranks in a bid to get to grips with the situation before it spirals out of control. Dr Peter Davies a consultant chest physician is one such expert. "We simply have to say clearly, once and for all, that the true cause of the return of tuberculosis in Britain is immigration. We just have to overcome this taboo about race and TB and look at the facts directly."

Dr Davies is not alone in his analysis. Professor Peter Ormerod, one of the leading British experts on the disease, says, "People can say what they like about racism, but facts are facts .…more than 56% of the TB cases in Britain today are in people who were born abroad." It is not racist to point out these facts nor is it the fault of the immigrants who carry this deadly plague. The blame lies with a liberal elite who, in pursuit of their multicultural Utopia, refuse to effectively deal with the asylum-seeker issue and in their impossible tight rope-balancing act of not offending the sensibilities of ethnic minorities show their true contempt for the indigenous population.

The World Health Organisation estimates that "as many as 50% of the world's refugees may be infected with TB" - a terrifying statistic when you consider that Britain is one of the most popular destinations for so-called refugees, indeed asylum-seekers coming through Heathrow are 22 times more likely to be suffering from TB than Britons. This can only serve to pour fuel on the flames that are already burning fiercely. The disease is already thriving in many cities such as Birmingham, Bradford, Wolverhampton, Blackburn, Bolton and Leicester, each with its own distinctive immigrant population. Established immigrants going back home to visit a country with a high rate of TB, or being visited by relatives who then import the disease, further aggravate the situation. According to the Public Health Laboratory Service the average infection rate for black Africans in 1998 was 210 per 100,000, and for those from the Indian sub-continent 121 per 100,000. This contrasts with just 4.4 per 100,000 for the indigenous white population.

That said, white people can catch TB - which is now developing new strains with strong resistance to antibiotics - just as easily as non-whites, so the widespread NHS practice of immunising only Asian children and refusing to give the same protection to white children is both racist and a deadly threat to our own youngsters. It is a fundamental duty of any government to safeguard the nation's health, but the handling of this issue amounts to wilful neglect by the political establishment. We deserve to live in security, without the fear of such an unnecessary threat. It is clear that only our party recognises the most basic obligation of any government - putting its own people first!


An NHS hospital is spending £6,000 a week on an illegal immigrant with TB who refuses to be treated. The money is being spent keeping him in a special isolation unit. Air pumped into the room is filtered to reduce the risk of infecting other people. Note, REDUCE the risk not PREVENT.


The cost to the NHS of treating asylum seekers and other immigrants with infectious diseases could be more than £1 billion for each year's arrivals. Research by think tank Migrationwatch says the number of cases could run into tens of thousands. The infections of particular concern are Aids, the hepatitis viruses B and C and tuberculosis, it said. These diseases represent specific, previously uncommon infections which, in some sending countries, are much more prevalent than in the UK, it said.

"The potential cost to the NHS is enormous in both financial and staff terms," said Roger Williams, professor of hepatology at University College, London. "It is absolutely essential that firm action be taken to prevent any further increase in this growing pool of potential infection. Furthermore, even a fraction of the money spent in the UK would treat a far larger number of patients in their own countries." The authors multiplied the incidence of these diseases in the sending countries by the number of migrants from them to get an approximate measure of the likely number of cases arriving in Britain, the organisation said.

For Aids patients, it has been estimated that modern anti-viral therapy costs at least £15,000 a year, while for hepatitis B and C the cost of annual therapy is £10-12,000, Migrationwatch said. A Department of Health spokeswoman said, "Access to the NHS is based on residence in the UK. A person who has made a formal application for permission to take refuge in the UK is exempt from charges for any NHS treatment received."


Home


These articles have been collected from various sources. If you are the copyright owner of any of them, contact us for either a credit and link to your site or removal of the article.