Economics -
Fuel Tax
The price of fuel in the
UK is a complicated business and it changes month
to month as the cost of crude oil rises and falls
with international demand. British drivers also
pay two taxes on the petrol they buy at the pump
- Fuel Duty and VAT. Of these, fuel duty remains
by far the most significant, and remains the most
controversial. If a litre of unleaded petrol
costs 85p, 21.7p will be the production costs and
profit, around 51p will be duty and 12.5p will be
VAT on top of all that.
The major change in petrol taxation came under
the Conservatives in 1993 with the introduction
of the Fuel Price Escalator. The escalator was
designed as a means both to raise money and
discourage car use on environmental grounds. At
the time, British fuel was the third-cheapest in
Europe. It is now the most expensive. The annual
fuel escalator was set in 1993 at 3% above the
rate of inflation. On its introduction it added
three pence to a litre of fuel and raised the tax
burden on unleaded petrol to 72.8% of the total
cost.
When the Conservatives left office in 1997, the
escalator was at 5% and had contributed a 11.1
pence rise to the cost of unleaded fuel. Tax as a
proportion of total cost stood at 76.3%. On
taking office, Labour's chancellor Gordon Brown
increased the fuel escalator further and put
three pence onto a litre of petrol in his first
Budget. That pushed taxes up to 81.5% of the
total price of fuel. While duty rose by two pence
a litre as part of the 2000 Budget, Gordon Brown
also scrapped the fuel price escalator, saying
that future increases would be decided on the
basis of the "due Budget process".
At the time, and perhaps rather ironically given
current events, the AA said that it was the first
budget in seven years in which "drivers can
take some heart". According to the Tories
this isn't good enough. They say that since
Labour came to office, the petrol pump price of
unleaded petrol has risen by around 71%. And
while there have been large jumps in the price of
oil, the party blames what it says is Labour's
16p per litre rise in taxes. Figures from the
Institute of Fiscal Studies tell a slightly
different story. The Conservative figure of 16p
per litre is a combination of duty and VAT.
While the actual amount brought in by VAT rises
with increases in fuel prices and duty, it is
calculated at the same 17.5% level which the
present government inherited from the
Conservatives. Fuel campaigners argue that VAT
should only be calculated on the cost of the fuel
rather than on the fuel and the duty together. If
VAT was not charged on the duty, the motorist
would save around 8p per litre at September 2000
prices. None of the parties appear to support
that move. Leaving aside VAT, fuel duty increases
under Labour amount to 12 pence per litre - just
slightly more than the rise caused by the
escalator under the Conservatives.
Because of the rise in world oil prices, the
proportion of the total fuel cost that is tax has
fallen from 85% (March 1998) to 72.3% today -
still one of the highest levels in the world -
something that ministers have sought to stress in
interviews. With the Tories pledging a three
pence a litre cut should they come to power, the
question is whether the Government should cut
fuel duty and whether the country can afford it.
Gordon
Brown is raking in so much extra tax from rising
oil prices that he could afford to cut 11p off a
litre of petrol. If oil went up to $50 dollars a
barrel, the Chancellor could even drop the basic
rate of income tax by 2p without denting his
coffers. Maurice Fitzpatrick, economics chief at
business advice group Numerica, said, "If
the oil price reached a sustained $50 a barrel
then the price of petrol would be above 90p a
litre from 80p now. The Treasury would be
receiving a windfall of an additional
£5.5billion per annum. This would be sufficient
to cut fuel duties by 11p per litre, or income
tax by 2p."
The
Government's climate change strategy is seriously
off course and current policies have yet to make
a significant impact on UK carbon emissions, an
all-party committee of MPs has warned. The
Environmental Audit Committee calls for a more
imaginative and radical strategy, particularly
for transport and domestic energy efficiency. It
also warns that the Treasury cannot expect
industry to provide investment in alternative
fuels unless it has a long-term strategy itself.
Politicians are accused of failing to make the
case for the environmental benefits of taxing
fuel and despite recent oil price rises, petrol
is still at least 10% cheaper than four years ago
in real terms. The MPs said in a report that the
Government should consider recycling the proceeds
of future fuel tax increases to subsidise public
transport spending and alternatives to
conventional fuel.
The MPs say that as a percentage of total tax,
the revenues from environmental taxes have
recently been at their lowest level since 1993.
But the continued growth of carbon emissions from
transport remains one of the most serious
problems and the Government's commitment to
sustainable development will be called into
question unless it takes steps to confront the
issue.
Next >>>
Home
These articles
have been collected from various sources. If you
are the copyright owner of any of them, contact us for
either a credit and link to your site or removal
of the article.