MOST EXPENSIVE
Britain has the most expensive train fares in
Europe. Passengers spending £10 on UK railways
can travel 23.8 miles, enough for a journey from
London to Windsor.
But in Bulgaria that equivalent sum would take
you 391 miles, the distance from London to
Motherwell, Scotland. Britain came bottom in a
value-for-money league table of Europe's
railways.
Germans get over 35 miles for their money, and in
the Netherlands and Belgium it buys a 50-mile
journey.
Passengers get 61 miles in France, equal to
London to Cambridge, while they go 91 miles in
Italy and 107 miles in Portugal.
The best value is in Eastern Europe, with
Bulgaria top. A tenner also goes 131 miles in the
Czech Republic, 141 miles in Hungary and 200
miles in Poland, equal to London to Manchester.
From 1979 to 2008 the price of train travel rose
49%, while motoring costs fell 17%. (Source: The Sun, Feb/10) |
|
|
RAIL FARES
Page
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
The Government engineered
a secret deal with First Capital Connect to double fares
on much-used routes, as a cheap way of reducing
overcrowding. Cheap day returns are no longer valid
during the rush hour period between 4.30pm and 7pm,
meaning people who have to travel home from work will be
forced to pay much more for standard return tickets.
Heavily used commuter belt routes such as Bedford to
London will now cost passengers an extortionate £30.30
rather than £16.
And although Alistair Darling, the transport secretary at
the time, announced that the deal would 'deliver better
services to passengers', he failed to inform the public
that the cost of many routes would double. A Department
for Transport spokeswoman said, "First presented us
with an option to increase some of the fares unregulated
by the government. We looked at the options but they have
commercial freedom to raise their fares. The company did
not tell us when they planned to implement the price
changes. It is a solution to overcrowding, but we are
open to all methods to reduce overcrowding."
Increases are also being put forward for South West
Trains, used by 140 million passengers yearly. Passenger
watchdog London TravelWatch, chairman Brian Cooke, said,
"It was devious of the government not to make clear
what had been agreed in First's bid. Ministers wanted
First to do their own dirty work. When a franchise is
agreed, the government should immediately publish all of
the terms, not just the attractive bits." Mr Cooke
said adding extra carriages would have immediately helped
overcrowding, rather than pricing commuters out of peak
time travel.
A spokeswoman for First Capital Connect said, "The
fare increases have worked well so far to reduce
overcrowding during peak times. We are however reducing
the number of stations affected from 37 to 25."
(Source: Mail on Sunday, Jun/06)
Facing peak fares in
excess of £200 for a three-hour journey, a small but
growing band of rail users have discovered that the UK's
complex fares structure can be turned to their advantage.
Why pay the full peak-time fare to Newcastle when you
can, perfectly legitimately, buy two tickets and make
exactly the same journey saving £80? Travelling from
Cornwall to the Midlands? Again, buy two tickets and you
save yourself 25%. Can't find a promised low-fare on a
certain journey? Then try buying four single tickets
instead, and save yourself a packet. The fact that it is
now possible to look up all fares on the internet means
that you can work out the anomalies in the system and use
them to your advantage.
Gwyneth Dunwoody, chair of the Commons transport select
committee that recently produced a damming report on
fares, said, "Unless rail companies stop cheating
passengers by continuing to drop the cheaper fares that
have traditionally been available, they will quite
reasonably find other ways to travel." A spokesman
for the Association of Train Operating Companies pointed
out that the anomalies are in no way new.
He said, "In any big fares structure, such things
will always happen and we are aware of them. However, you
cannot expect ticketing staff to take customers through
the various options, not least because they would not
necessarily have access to the information, but also
because huge queues would build up in ticket
offices." (Source: The Guardian, Jun/06)
Passengers
face above-inflation price rises for rail tickets from
January 2007. Unregulated fares, which companies are able
to set themselves and cover tickets such as cheap day
returns, will increase by between 3% and 7%. The
Association of Train Operating Companies said the money
was needed to pay for ongoing service improvements.
Regulated fares, which include season tickets and saver
tickets, are determined by the Department for Transport
and account for 40% of tickets sold.
Most train companies will raise fares by 4.3%, 1% above
inflation, when the new prices are introduced. Merseyrail
is to increase its regulated fares by 3.2%, while the
Southeastern trains service between Kent and London will
go up by 6.3% under the terms of its new franchise.
Island Line prices will go up by 5.3% while there will be
no increase for Hull Trains and Heathrow Express
passengers. Unregulated fares, which account for 60% of
tickets sold, will go up by varying amounts depending on
train operator, with an average rise of 4.7%.
There are also big increases planned for the two
dedicated airport services, the Gatwick Express and
Heathrow Express, which will both see rises of 7.3%. Atoc
director general George Muir said, "While no-one
likes to pay more for their travel, we need the revenue
to pay for the ongoing improvements to the railways that
passengers expect - and overall satisfaction levels are
now at an all time high of 80%. Train operators will
continue to raise their game, delivering further
improvements to the railway and enhancing the travel
experience of passengers." (Source: BBC News, Nov/06)
|
|
|