COMMENTS
Once the Bill to make illegal incitement
to religious hatred is enacted, I hope that the
full force of the law will be directed at those
individuals and organisations that incite
religious hatred by removing crucifixes from
crematoriums, banning the celebration of
Christmas in schools and seeking to ban Bibles
from hospitals. Antony Walker
Those officials who propose the
removal of crucifixes and hospital Bibles display
a curious interpretation of the term
multiculturalism. Tom
Sheridan |
HATE PREACHER
A radical Muslim cleric who claims Britain
deserves suicide bombings has been allowed in the
country by ministers. The Foreign Office gave
Delwar Hossain Sayeedi a visa saying he
does not meet the criteria for
refusal. He has incited violence on
previous visits to Britain yet the Foreign Office
refused to keep him out. (Source: The Sun, Jul/06) |
PUNISHMENT
Islamic groups have accused the
Government of "demonising, devaluing and
targeting" their religion through proposed
anti-terror legislation.
Islamic Human Rights Commission and the Muslim
Association of Britain warned that the clampdown
would fuel a "radical sub-culture", and
also called for the word "extremist" to
be banned.
They said, "This would amount to a
punishment of the community and will be likely to
create fear and prevent legitimate political
discussion in mosques." Who exactly has
blamed Islam for the London bomb attacks? |
|
|
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED BILL
The new Racial and Religious Hatred Bill
will create a new offence of incitement to religious
hatred and would apply to comments made in public or in
the media, as well as through written material. Ministers
insist it will not ban people, including artists and
performers, from offending, criticising or ridiculing
faiths. The government said the legislation is a response
to the concerns of faith groups, particularly Muslims.
The Muslim Council of Britain welcomed the move, arguing
that the courts have already extended such protection to
Sikh and Jewish people. Sher Khan, a council spokesman,
said to protect some groups but not others contravened
the European human rights laws.
Although Muslim cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi is banned from
entering the United States and has been jailed in Egypt,
he's been invited to Manchester's Muslim Unity Convention
at Bridgewater Hall in Manchester. Al-Qaradawi praised
Palestinian suicide bombings as "martyrdom in the
name of God". Mohammed Shafiq of the Ramadhan
Foundation, which is organising the event, said,
"What he said has been taken out of context."
However, according to the Mayor of London, Ken
Livingstone, al-Qaradawi was not even aware he had been
invited. The mayor's office telephoned al-Qaradawi's
office with an Arabic speaker and were told that he is
not coming to Britain. Mr Livingstone said, "Not
only is he not coming (to Britain), he was not aware that
he was invited."
An Islamic academic who says suicide bombings are
justified will preach to young Muslims in London at a
conference funded by British taxpayers. Egyptian-born
Prof Tariq Ramadan has been banned from the US and France
for endorsing terrorism. Met Police Commissioner Sir Ian
Blair defended the decision to invite the scholar to
speak at a police-sponsored conference saying his was an
important voice that would be listened to by young
radicalised Muslims adding, "We can't understand why
he's banned in the US, and he is no longer banned in
France." Someone needs to have a word with Sir Ian.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke has taken
sweeping powers to boot hate-preachers out of Britain and
any judged dangerous to the public will be BANNED from
coming here. Those who are already here will have their
indefinite leave to remain TORN UP. But the
Governments own Human Rights Act means cleric Omar
Bakri Mohammed cannot be sent back to his Syrian homeland
in case he faces torture or execution there.
On the other hand, British war hero Col Jorge Mendonca
faces charges with soldiers who served in Iraq. Col
Mendonca was decorated for his courage and leadership of
the Queens Lancashire Regiment in Iraq but he is
among seven soldiers charged after an Iraqi died in
custody, even though HE ordered a probe. Tory Defence
spokesman Gerald Howarth raged, Our country seems
to have gone totally mad. Every sane person will be
astonished we are prosecuting a highly-decorated Army
officer when the Government has been unable to deal with
Bakris preachings.
A mum who put
up a national newspaper poster urging people to back our
troops in Iraq has been accused of a race crime. Janet
Thomas, of Mount Pleasant in Crewe, was finger-printed
and photographed at Crewe Police Station after being
arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated harassment.
She was quizzed after a neighbour complained about a
Support Our Boys Sun poster displayed in her front
window. Now the mother-of-two is taking legal advice
after being placed on police bail and told to return to
the police station on November 23. Police are continuing
their enquiries into the allegation while taking advice
from the Crown Prosecution Service.
Janet said, "I took the poster down months ago after
getting paint on it and couldn't believe what I was
hearing when the police referred to it. My ex-partner was
a soldier and served in the Gulf and I simply wanted to
show my support for the lads. To be accused of a race
crime thinking the way I do is ridiculous. I spent four
hours in the station where I was interviewed and my ID
put on record. It was a totally humiliating experience
and all for being patriotic." She went voluntarily
to the police station after getting a phone call from
police. The next day The Sun sent a photographer with a
new poster for her to pose with in a picture.
The family has been locked in a dispute with former
neighbours. Cheshire Police said they could not comment
on whether the complaint was linked to the dispute. A
spokesman said, "We received an allegation of
racially aggravated harassment which resulted in a
38-year-old woman being arrested. She was released on
police bail pending further enquiries and advice from the
Crown Prosecution Service. If someone makes such an
allegation we are duty bound to investigate it." The
CPS will have to decide if there is a case to answer.
(Source: Cheshire Online, Nov/05)
A Muslim who
ranted against Britain has moved back here from Pakistan,
to live on benefits. Zeeshan Siddiqui was tracked down to
a quiet, tree-lined road in Heston, West London,
following his release from custody by Pakistani police
who were probing suspected terror links. In the past he
has said he wants to be an Islamic martyr, called for all
non-Muslims to be killed and declared his contempt for
the UK. Yet he is happy to sponge off our taxpayers to
the tune of £52.60 a week in Jobseekers Allowance.
Siddiqui slipped back into Britain after eight months in
prison in Peshawar. He was suspected of having links to
the 7/7 London bombers and at school was friends with
Britains first suicide bomber Asif Hanif, who died
in Israel in 2003. (Source: The Sun, Mar/06)
Preacher of hate Abu Qatada is to cost
taxpayers more money on a last-ditch appeal against
deportation, despite a ruling that he should be kicked
out of Britain. The legal aid bill run up by Qatada, once
described as Osama Bin Ladens top henchman in
Europe, is believed to have already cost £200,000. His
lawyer immediately gave notice that leave would be sought
to make a further appeal against the judgment. Qatada was
granted legal aid despite detectives finding £180,000 in
cash stashed away in his West London home. His family
have received thousands in hand-outs and it has also cost
the public more than £140,000 to keep him behind bars.
He arrived in Britain on false papers in 1993 and videos
of 18 of his ranting sermons were found in the flat of
9/11 hijack leader Mohammed Atta. His family scrounged
hundreds of thousands of pounds in state handouts after
he arrived here on a fake passport in 1993 and he was
granted asylum despite a dossier detailing his extensive
links with terrorists. How can somebody with £180,000 in
cash be entitled to legal aid? And ..."he arrived
here on false papers in 1993". If his papers were
false how can he claim for benefits? (Source: The Sun, Feb/07)
|
|
|