NATIVITY
PLAY AXED
The traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove
Community First School in Norwich has been axed
in favour of a celebration of a range of
different faiths. Instead of a Nativity play, the
school's 100 children aged four to eight are
presenting pieces about the origins of Christmas,
the Jewish holiday Hanukkah and the Hindu
festival of Diwali. (Source: Mail on Sunday, Dec/06) |
CARDS BANNED
Schoolkids have been banned from making Mother's
Day cards in class, to avoid upsetting pupils
without a mum. Head Helen Starkey defended
herself by saying 5% of the 357 pupils at
Johnstown Primary in Carmarthen, Dyfed, had
little or no contact with their real mums. Which
means the 95% majority have. (Source: Daily Mirror, Feb/07) |
PRAYERS BANNED
Prayers held at council meetings for nearly 600
years have been axed in case they offend other
religions. The official gatherings have always
opened with a short prayer led by a vicar to ask
for guidance, then closed with the Lords
Prayer. Now, Mayor Prudence Boswell has ordered
the prayers to be replaced with a quiet
moment of reflection in Totnes, Devon and
half a dozen clergy have been told they will no
longer be needed.
Mrs Boswell, a practising Catholic and
independent councillor, said, If people
want to say prayers on their own they can. We
have just taken away the person who leads them.
We wanted to give people the opportunity to think
quietly in their own way. We did have a Buddhist
member a few years ago. I am sure we probably
have had non-believers, but I would not know who,
its not my business. (Source: The Sun, Jan/07) |
MUM AND DAD BANNED
A new report claims the NHS should ban staff from
saying mum and dad and husband
and wife to avoid offending gays. Instead
it suggests they consider using phrases like
guardians or carers.
Without the change, there is a risk that gay
couples or their children will be alienated, the
report concludes. The document is called Fair For
All, The Wider Challenge, Good Lesbian Gay
Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Practice in the
NHS. (Source: The Sun, Feb/07) |
|
|
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Swindon Borough Council told an author that
his book, honouring First World War soldiers, cannot be
stocked by his local library unless he takes out
insurance worth £5million. Officials said Mark Sutton
needed the accident cover in case the public injured
themselves on his book, for example, if it fell on their
foot or they got paper cuts. The book was withdrawn from
the Tourist Information Centre in Swindon until Mr Sutton
pays the £150 insurance premium.
Mr Sutton, who has sold 1,000 copies of the £12.99 book
since it went on sale, said, "I refuse to get the
insurance. It's just another one of these silly Health
and Safety measures and it has gone potty. You couldn't
make it up. It's ridiculous. I didn't write the book for
money, it's for the memory of the men who died and gave
everything for us. I wonder what they would think if they
were here to see their names couldn't be preserved just
because people want to be greedy."
Mr Sutton spent three years researching the 300-page
book, "Tell Them Of Us", which is available in
a number of outlets and also through Internet bookstores
but Swindon Borough Council said he must take out public
liability insurance to continue selling it at the town's
Tourist Information Centre. Officials claim regulations
require all providers of any council services to have
valid insurance, or the authority could be found liable
and sued if an accident occurs.
Council spokesman Richard Freeman said the insurance was
to protect against potential legal claims caused by
defective products. He acknowledged that the risk of
injury was small in Mr Sutton's case, but said it was
standard insurance industry practice, and all council
suppliers must have cover from April 1. He said,
"The problem here is not with the council but with a
society that is becoming obsessed with litigation. We
have to cover for every eventuality, even if that is an
accident caused by pages falling out of the book. Nobody
is denying its a very small risk, but the risk is
there."
He added, "The cover we require is normally for
£5million but we are prepared to reduce this to
£2million for smaller suppliers including Mr Sutton. The
high number of claims made against organisations these
days means no one offering any products or services for
sale can afford to be without public liability insurance.
Premiums are usually based on turnover and the level of
risk, and can be as little as £150." (Source: Mail on Sunday, Feb/07)
Council bosses who put up road signs in
Polish to help immigrant drivers had to remove them after
twice breaching traffic regulations. The Department for
Transport confirmed that the notices were unlawful.
Engineers at Cheshire County Council failed to seek the
special dispensation required to put up signs in a
foreign language. They are also illegally displaying at
least one with directions in metres when imperial
measurements are only permitted. (Source: Daily Express, Feb/07)
Headmaster Nicholas Wollaston has introduced
PC versions of festive songs for this years school party.
He is insisting on a reggae-themed Twelve Days of
Christmas with the line Partridge In A Pear
Tree changed to Cornbird In A Palm
Tree. Instead of Twelve Lords A-Leaping
or Ten Pipers Piping, kids will sing about
Six Limbo Dancers and Seven Steel Band
Beaters. Other changes include a ruling that
Christmas classic Away In A Manger will not be sung but
performed in sign language and Rocking Around The
Christmas Tree becomes Rocking Around The Shops.
One parent said, I have no problem with the kids
learning about other cultures, but now it is Christmas.
To turn it into some sort of politically correct function
with a Caribbean flavour is just not on. This is Britain
and we want a traditional British Christmas for our
kids. However, deputy head Elizabeth Brailsford
claimed that putting on nativity plays disrupted the
schools curriculum and adversely affected
childrens behaviour. She added, If anything,
this is even more traditional than any other year.
Were going to have poems, Christmas carols and
Bible readings. (Source: The Sun, Dec/06)
Office Christmas parties face the axe after
the Government's industrial relations watchdog warned
bosses they face being sued for a raft of
"politically correct" misdemeanours. In an
advice pamphlet, Acas told firms they have a "duty
of care" to drunken staff and could face crippling
legal action if they do not get home safely. Managers
were also told age discrimination laws could be breached
if the music and entertainment caters only for younger
staff, and holding a raffle or giving out alcoholic
prizes could offend Muslims.
Any member of staff who suffers "verbal abuse"
for being gay could also sue, even if it takes place in
the pub before the office party. And Acas added a
"proper risk assessment" must be carried out
before any decorations are put up, particularly if they
could be fire hazards. Staff were cleared to display
trees, tinsel and lights, but only because they are
"secular" and "not inherently
religious". This, the advice note says, makes it
"difficult to argue that they cause offence to
non-Christians".
Possible pitfalls include age discrimination laws, a raft
of health and safety legislation and the Protection from
Harassment Act. Damages could run to hundreds of
thousands of pounds, enough to cripple a small business.
Acas's warning said managers would be in "hot
water" if drunken staff do not get home safely. This
is because they have a "duty of care", under
various health and safety laws, to all employees.
Scenarios could include stumbling out of the party drunk
and falling over in the street, or getting knocked down.
They could also be liable if a worker injures himself
driving home while drunk. Factors which would make a firm
more liable to action would include senior managers being
present at the party, and an unlimited supply of free
alcohol. Staff could also sue if they fall while on the
premises where the party was being held.
Acas said that, by following its advice, employers could
argue they had all reasonable steps to protect their
staff from harm. These included providing plenty of food
and soft drink, the number of taxi companies in the area
and ensuring the event finishes while public transport is
still running. To avoid age discrimination claims, firms
are told to "ensure there is a mix of music and that
any organised entertainment takes account of all
ages". (Source: Mail on Sunday, Nov/06)
A council has banned the phrase
"singing from the same hymn sheet" in case it
upsets atheists. Salisbury council has told employees
that the religious connotations of the saying could
offend non-believers. Officials have also been told not
to use the phrase 'colour blind' but instead to refer to
'colour visual impairment'. The advice from Salisbury
council says, "Avoid office and council jargon
wherever possible, including phrases such as 'moving
forward' and 'singing from the same hymn sheet'. Say what
you mean, so instead of 'moving forward' try 'in the
future'. Not everyone understand these phrases, some can
actually cause offence (what would an atheist want with
your hymn sheet?)." (Source: Ananova, Nov/08)
|
|
|