LIGHTS FIASCO
The new roundabout at the City Hospital has been
designed with masses of traffic lights and is
comparable with the roundabout at junction 25 of
the M1, but has only a fraction of the traffic.
On travelling from Mickleover to town, I have
been stopped four times out of every five,
looking at an empty roundabout but denied
permission to proceed. Roundabouts are superior
to traffic lights in optimising traffic flow, yet
engineers insist on installing more robots to
halt the busy approaches to give priority to
empty ones.
T. Harrop |
REVENUE EARNER
Staff at the University of Derby are facing the
prospect of paying for the privilege of parking
their cars at their place of work in what has
been described as a "transport policy"
to lead to "greener" use of personal
transport. Nothing to do with using the car park
as a source of income then?
The changes, implemented over the summer when
most were on holiday, supposedly follow
"extensive consultation", which comes
as news to many. Needless to say, the scheme will
be accompanied by wheel clamping, again, nothing
to do with using the car park as a source of
revenue. What next? Fees for lift use, door use?
Peter Lennox |
SAME OLD STORY
Ian Wheatley, who works for the Derby
City Council was on Radio Derby's Andy Whittaker
show telling Mr and Mrs Public that it was their
job to keep the River Gardens litter free.
Fair comment, but if the river becomes flooded
this winter, and old trees are brought down, are
we going to wait two years while they take root
before they are removed, like the last lot that
have just been removed from the weirs in the
river? Why has the sudden clean up been done?
Why has it been cleaned up now that winter is
coming? Why was it not cleaned up before the
summer so that people could enjoy it during the
glorious summer we have had? The council should
get its own house in order before it tells other
people to - there are overgrown roadsides and
hedgerows belonging to the city council that need
cutting and cleaning up. Alan Hunt |
| |
|
|
PUBLIC OPINION
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
FIRST AND LAST TIME
I ventured into Derby for the first time this year the
other morning. If I can plan things right, it will also
be my last visit of the year. Our first impression was
made by the litter-strewn, weed-infested car park and we
were further charmed by the boarded-up and empty shops.
On walking into the centre, we were greeted with a merry
quip from the obligatory Becket Street drunk, as he
lurched toward us, can in hand.
Walking through this place is quite a sad process, as you
view the once fine public and commercial buildings now
containing the ubiquitous, characterless chain pubs and
the identikit chain shops. The sadness deepens with a
visit to the market place with its laughable
ornamentation and destroyed views - soon to be compounded
by the offence against taste and financial prudence that
is Quad.
The whole impression of Derby is summed up by the
Christmas decorations, now somewhat tatty and forlorn,
which no-one could be bothered to take down even though
it is now the middle of January. As we enjoyed the best
part of the day (the road out), I realised why Derby has
become the laughing stock of the Midlands. Bob
Attenborough
TIME FOR A CHANGE
The time has arrived for a complete change in
the mind set of Derby City Council, Derby Cityscape and
the sundry hangers on who are leading development within
the city. This is confirmed by the latest idea from the
developer of the new Eagle Centre to add a cinema complex
to the scheme. I am not against cinemas, but the whole
crux of the matter is, that because new developments are
becoming too expensive for shops to relocate to, we are
being lead down a slippery slope where anything, however
inappropriate, goes. Just look at the number of shops
closing within the city. This can only increase as we try
to pile more and more shopping outlets into unaffordable
situations. These people are only able to see the large
cash returns at the time of development, with little or
no thought to the long-term viability. We must have a
complete rethink before it's too late. Mr A
Dunn
LITTER MONITOR
Residents of Oakwood demanded a litter monitor
to be hired by the city council, to help clean-up the
area's rubbish-strewn shopping centre. This monitor would
patrol the area and take tough action against litter
louts. A very good idea one may say. But it's not going
to happen because our eminent city council leader,
Maurice Burgess, said, "If Oakwood has one, everyone
will want one". This is rich, coming from the leader
who constantly highlights certain areas of this city for
preferential treatment and services.
These areas are mainly Normanton, Pear Tree, Osmaston
and, more recently, Derwent. Apart from improved services
and equipment, with them not yet involved in the two bin
system, they still enjoy a once-weekly bin collection.
Some of these areas also receive improvements to their
private houses, CCTV cameras, clocks, flower baskets,
improved shopping areas and refurbishment of their local
pubs, to name just a few.
So why can't Oakwood enjoy something that is unique to
Oakwood? But Oakwood will not receive the services, so
may I suggest that the traders in the precinct keep the
immediate area in front of their premises litter free.
After all, I have been doing this in front of my
property, including the removal of leaves, for years. I
cannot remember when I last set eyes on a litter picker
in my area. I only wish we were fortunate enough to, at
least, receive some of the standard services we pay our
council tax for. D. H.
Lockley
TRAVEL
People travel for business reasons, to work, to
shop and to visit someone in Derbyshire Royal Infirmary.
If the council wants cars out of the city centre, we have
all the space on Pride Park to build a modern bus
station, a shopping mall, a theatre and an ice rink for
top shows. We have to travel or take day trips to see
tourist attractions but Derby has all the potential to
compete. We live in a city with a river, Elvaston Country
Park, Pride Park and derelict areas. If we plan and build
the right features, tourists and day trippers into Derby
would soon generate money. Other cities are spending
millions and have spent millions on features to attract
toursists and day trippers. Houses, flats, office blocks,
pubs, casinos, and nightclubs will not attract anybody.
Do these council people see the progress in other cities
or do they never leave Derby? B.
Flood
PROMISES
NOT BEING HONOURED
About a year ago, I approached my Lib Dem
councillors to request the installation of dropped kerbs
for wheelchairs in front of the shops in Devonshire
Drive, Mickleover. They put me in touch with a council
officer, who inspected and agreed that ramps were a
necessity in this area of predominantly old people's
bungalows and where several residents are
wheelchair-users. Installation was promised for June or
July 2004. Nothing happened. I again approached the
councillors and the officer.
I was told that there had been a delay and the kerbs
would be installed soon; then that the budget had been
spent and they would have to await further funds. The
council has now seen fit to resurface an area of pavement
in front of the shops. Surely this was the time to put in
dropped kerbs, thus saving a second day of work on the
same spot. I have at least learned that the Lib Dems and
council officers cannot be trusted to honour their
promises and that they appear to have little regard for
the disabled. Derek J North MBE
EQUALITY
I was interested in a "City celebrates its
wealth of cultures" advertisement and although it
was a very last-minute advertisement of this event (I had
seen no other), it appealed to me as I enjoy learning
about various cultures. Seeing no mention of Scottish,
Welsh, Irish or English in the report, I decided to try
to contact the programme organisers, Derby Cultural
Diversity Community Group. I rang Derby City Council and
spoke to a lady who gave me more information on the
event.
She stated that she was from the equality department. It
did not appear to mention anything of the above nature so
I asked if there would be anything representing our
English culture. She replied there would be some Irish
dancing. I asked against about English, Scottish and
Welsh (I feel there is a wealth culture there). The
reply, "Oh yes, there will be an English lady doing
a belly dancing display!" I said I could not recall
that as part of my English culture.
Her reply to most of my questions seemed to be that, when
invited to do something for this day, the part of culture
I was referring to showed no interest or was too busy. I
suggested that since there was Afro-Caribbean poetry
represented, could not they have included an English
poet? I was told that all of the spaces had been divided
equally and that, perhaps next year, there might be a
different approach.
I replied that, when I went to school, if something was
divided equally, you all got a piece and of the same
size. That isn't how it is, she argued! I told her I felt
very hurt to realise I didn't appear to have a culture
and threw out the challenge (since some of my money seems
to have been allocated for this venture) that perhaps
next year, she might include something of my heritage.
Belly-dancing? English? It's news to me! Share something
equally and all have a different-sized piece? Have I
missed something? Mrs Janet R. Sharp
COUNCIL ACTIONS
When the deputy chief executive of the city council
states that a period of only 14 days is required to
advertise to the public the proposed loss of public open
space in Full Street, he may be legally correct. However,
morally, this is just another nail in the coffin of
democracy in this city. Why are they in such a rush? One
imagines that the city council wishes to dispose of this
strip of land at a very exorbitant price to the highest
bidder. This is because the site of the ex-police station
is virtually useless to a developer without the extra
strip of land.
So, yet again, instead of a beautiful green space
overlooking Cathedral Green, we will, no doubt, get
another cheap-looking monstrosity. What can the citizens
of Derby do to stop this farce? Very little. There are
few grounds for objection and the decision on the sale of
the land will not even be made by the full council. This
is supposedly known as local government being open with
the public and allowing democracy to flourish. What utter
rubbish! It is about a very greedy council getting even
more greedy. Tony Dunn
|
|
|