CALLING HOUSE
Why all the surprise about the city council
wanting to be rid of the Council House? This is
Derby, you know! Heritage and culture are dirty
words! My only surprise is that it's taken so
long for the council to decide this fine building
is too old. My one consolation is that the
Cathedral is out of reach - otherwise that would
go for sure! John Hudson |
MOVING
HOUSE
If the council wish to move to a building more in
keeping with its status, I would like to suggest
one it already owns - that green tin shack on
Markeaton Park! I loved Councillor Hickson's
comment "It will only cost £4.2m more than
staying where we are."
You try asking the council to spend more than
£4m on a worthwhile project and you will be met
by, "it is unfair to expect the council tax
payers of Derby to foot such a large bill",
and it certainly is a lot of council tax payers'
money!
I was not at all surprised that the developer and
the estate agent were in favour of the move! The
Council House, Town Hall, or whatever, represents
the public face of the civil dignity of any town
or city. To remove the council from the Council
House to some faceless modern building would
represent yet another status degradation of the
city of Derby, which our councils, past and
present, seem to be pretty good at doing.
The council says it needs more room for its staff
within a close proximity, so what's wrong with
utilising those other Aslin buildings which are
redundant at the moment, right opposite the
Council House, the old police station and
magistrates' courts? John Hudson |
|
|
NEW HOME FOR CITY COUNCIL
Page 1 | 2 | 3
Derby City Council is set to unveil
a £33m plan to "rebuild" its aging Council
House. Under the proposals, the building would have its
insides stripped out, leaving only the facade and an
extra storey would be built along with an atrium and a
new council chamber. The changes are designed to allow
staff to work more flexibly and efficiently, and will see
the building's capacity rise from 500 to 1900 people.
Councillor Mike Carr said the architects had envisaged a
virtual "rebuilding" of the council's
headquarters. He said, "It will be stripped out, and
a major overhaul, rebuilding is probably the best term,
will commence. It will involve building inside the
courtyard, a new atrium and open plan offices. Then after
two years, all the staff will move back into exciting
accommodation. We have always been expecting this, so
we've squirreled away the money."
The building, which was completed at the start of World
War II, is running up high maintenance costs and creating
high levels of CO2 emissions because of its poor
insulation. But energy efficiency is not the only reason
for the changes. The council's chief executive, Adam
Wilkinson, has said he wants to encourage some employees
to work from home and stop using paper in order to
increase the efficiency of staff. Earlier plans for a
£20m renovation and a move to a new site appear to have
been ruled out. The plans will be presented to city
councillors with staff expected to vacate the building by
the end of 2010. (Source: BBC News, Jun/10)
Structural work is needed to the Council
House to stop it sinking. Large cracks have appeared in
several walls of the building because of subsidence and
structural engineers say it will have to be underpinned
soon to stop it subsiding further. The problem is
believed to be caused by the River Derwent washing away
some of the building's foundations. Engineers have
monitored the building for several years but the severity
of the subsidence has only just come to light.
It is hoped the cost of putting the problem right will be
contained within £5m set aside for refurbishing the
building, however, this money will also have to pay for
new windows, rewiring and cosmetic improvements over the
next three years. Council leader Chris Williamson said,
"The cracks in one corridor have grown to one or two
inches in places. It is just anecdotal evidence and
doesn't mean the floor has moved by that much but it is
clear there is movement. It is a bit like the Leaning
Tower of Pisa, we need to do something more
permanent."
Chris Edwards, assistant director of property services at
the council, said assessment work would have to be done
within the next 12 months to find out the exact cause of
the problem before a solution could be worked out. He
said, "Until we get something into the floor and
take some core samples to see what's there, we don't know
how exactly we are going to tackle it. It is likely we
will need some form of underpinning. We can't just leave
it." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Jun/07)
Derby City
Council could move out of its city centre premises and
into purpose-built modern offices. The idea was put
forward after it came to light that more than £6m worth
of repairs needs to be carried out on the 1930s Council
House, in Corporation Street. It would also slash the
annual £100,000 maintenance budget for the building and
ensure all council services are under one roof.
At the moment council employees are in several different
offices, including the Council House, Middleton House in
St Mary's Gate, Roman House, Celtic House and Saxon House
in Friar Gate. The suggestion of a move comes after a
draft report from property consultants Donaldsons. The
report, unlikely to be made public until 2005, follows a
review into the offices, commissioned by the previous
Labour administration, to assess state of the buildings,
establish accommodation needs and provide money-saving
ideas.
Deputy council leader Philip Hickson has seen the report
and said it "highlights the deficiencies in the
current provision of council office accommodation".
The idea of the council moving out of its current
buildings is not a new one. In 2003 it was mooted it
could move into the Riverlights scheme and Derby College
also considered the Council House, which was built by
architect Charles Aslin, for its new city centre campus.
Mr Hickson said, "It's costing us a fortune to
maintain the current Council House and we could end up
pouring millions into maintenance costs for the building
for no return. We're coming to the stage where the
council will need to reach some decisions on whether it
can continue to pour money into the Council House, or
have a purpose-built site, but we don't currently have
any idea where that might be."
He said no decision on the building's future would be
made until the report has been discussed in public. Chris
Williamson, leader of the city's Labour group, said,
"We need to see what the report suggests before we
know what will happen. The important thing is that the
council retains a presence in the city centre. The
Council House is a landmark building and so if the
council was to move out, it could be used for civic
purposes. If the council was to move into a single
building we would have to assess the economic impact of
such a move."
£6m to repair the Council House? £100 000
per annum for maintenance? That's an awful lot of
lightbulbs. What on earth does it need? Is it slipping
into the Derwent? Is it riddled with dry rot? I'll tell
you what, I'll pack up my job and do it for £5.75m.
There you are, I've just saved us hard-pressed taxpayers
£250 000 at a stroke. Have they had an offer for their
prime riverside site?
Mind you, that would involve knocking down the Council
House to make room for more bars, hotels and nightclubs.
Still, so what, they've ripped the heart out of this
once-fair city anyway with other ludicrous planning
decisions from the Mayor's Parlour through the Cockpit
car park to the Riverlights fiasco. Delusions of grandeur
have obviously forced the attentions of our illustrious
leaders on more urgent matters than the myriad or more
dow-to-earth problems that need addressing.
You can guarantee though, that once some figures are
produced for this magnificent new edifice, the estimated
cost can be trebled to take into account the extra large
mahogany desks, extra thick-pile carpets, hand-made
wallpaper and a very large cheque to consultants. Oh, and
don't forget the helicopter landing pad for the constant
visits from property developers.
It sounds to me as though we are being set up for another
round of profligacy by our spendthrift councillors, who
would do well to take note that we vote for them to run
our city efficiently and effectively for our benefit, not
their own. Do like the rest of us lesser mortals and make
do with what you have or, if you don't like your job or
workplace, leave and get a real job. C Y
Nical
Next >>>
|
|
|