|
|
MASS IMMIGRATION
The
Migrationwatch think tank has just released a copy of the
uncensored Home Office Economics and Resources Analysis
Unit and the Cabinet Office Performance and Innovation
Unit document which proves that mass immigration to
Britain is a political tool used by the Labour Party to
socially engineer society for its own ends. This
document, available here, was given
restricted circulation in October 2000 and was obtained
by Migrationwatch UK under a Freedom of Information Act
request to the Cabinet Office.
Migrationwatch said, “The massive increase in
immigration under Labour was a deliberate policy
undertaken for ‘social’ as well as economic
reasons." In an article for the Evening Standard
last October, Andrew Neather, a former speech writer for
Blair, Straw and Blunkett in the early 2000s, revealed
that mass immigration “didn’t just happen: the
deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000 until at
least February last year… was to open up the UK to
mass migration.”
According to Migrationwatch, Mr Neather went on to
describe a Government policy document which he had helped
to write in 2000. He said that “drafts were handed
out in summer 2000 only with extreme reluctance: there
was paranoia about it reaching the media.” The paper
was eventually surfaced as a purely technical product of
the Research Department of the Home Office but earlier
drafts that he saw “included a driving political
purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the
Government was going to make the UK truly
multicultural.”
He remembered “coming away from some discussions
with the clear sense that the policy was intended, even
if this wasn’t its main purpose, to rub the
Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments
out of date.” Migrationwatch have now obtained an
earlier draft of that policy paper, circulated in October
2000, and have compared it to the version eventually
published in 2001 by the Home Office Research Department
as a rather obscure economic paper. The draft had already
been censored but it was to be neutered still further. In
the Executive Summary six out of eight references to
“social” objectives were removed from the
version later published.
These included a remark that “the entry control
system is not closely related to the stated policy
objectives. This is particularly true in the social area,
where in the past the implicit assumption has largely
been that keeping people out promotes stability.”
Also cut out was a statement that “in practice,
entry controls can contribute to social exclusion”
as well as other politicised passages in the main body of
the document. Sir Andrew Green, Chairman of
Migrationwatch, said, “Andrew Neather later tried to
play down the significance of his revelations but these
documents show that his original account was
correct."
He added, "Labour had a political agenda which they
sought to conceal for initiating mass immigration to
Britain. Why else would they be so anxious to remove any
mention of social aspects unless they feared that they
would reveal their true motives? Only now that their
working class supporters are deserting them in droves
have they started to talk about restricting immigration.
Our population is heading rapidly towards 70 million,
largely as a result of immigration, but they still refuse
to set any limits.”
Migrationwatch also pointed out that the Labour manifesto
of 1997 made no reference to an increase in immigration.
It said only that “Every country must have firm
control over immigration and Britain is no
exception.” Furthermore, the think tank said, the
Labour manifesto issued in 2001, after the publication of
this document, said only that “People from abroad
make a positive contribution to British society. As our
economy changes and expands, so our rules on immigration
need to reflect the need to meet skill shortages.”
Finally, research into voting patterns was conducted for
the Electoral Commission in May 2005, just after the last
election. The “Black and Minority Ethnic
Survey”, conducted by MORI, asked which party
respondents had voted for in 2005. Of Caribbean and
African voters, 80% had voted Labour, 2–3%
Conservative and 5–11% Liberal Democrat. Indian,
Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for
Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were
11%, 11% and 9% while Lib Dems came in at 14%, 25% and
16%. Mixed and other categories were similar to the
Asians. (Source: BNP, Feb/10)
The Key to Immigration is a 4½ hour long,
high quality, comprehensive DVD guide to living, working,
studying or visiting the UK if you are from any country
outside the EU. It is also available to be watched as a
streaming video and provides a comprehensive overview of
the most popular UK visa categories and immigration
applications. It simplifies and clarifies not only the
highly complex UK immigration laws but also the
procedures and requirements you will need to follow which
are often equally important as even a small error can
result in a visa refusal on a technicality. UK
immigration lawyers explain in detail the eligibility and
application procedures for over 35 different UK visa
categories as well as permanent residence (Indefinite
Leave to Remain) applications and citizenship
(naturalisation) applications.
Most chapters are dedicated to one type of visa
application though some discuss and compare more than
one. At the end of each chapter there is a review which
summarises on-screen all the key points. This DVD
contains a goldmine of information which should help you
understand which category or categories of visa best
apply to you and explains how you could qualify. The same
information that is available in this DVD could easily
cost over £1,000 if you consulted an immigration lawyer.
This DVD is perfect for workers, employers,
entrepreneurs, investors, business people, asylum
seekers, students, visitors, relatives, spouses, civil
partners, unmarried partners, fiancé(e)s, and anyone
else with questions regarding UK immigration law and
procedures.
Watch the video here
|
|
|
