OVER THE TOP
Thirteen-year-old Naythan Barnard was
fined £75 for dropping a sweet wrapper on the
ground by accident. The schoolboy, from Port
Talbot, South Wales, was in the street getting
sweets out of his pocket when a wrapper fell to
the ground.
In seconds, officials for Neath and Port Talbot
Council pounced with the fine. The officials,
standing near a sweet shop, were not in uniform
and had only badges around their necks as ID.
Naythan said, The wrapper had barely
touched the ground when two men walked towards me
and stopped me. They didnt even give me a
chance to pick it up.
Naythan was so worried about telling his parents
they had to pay £75 that it brought on an asthma
attack. Angry mum Gaynor said, I later
phoned the council to complain but they just said
they wanted their money. |
Pensioner
Robert Berriman was hit with a £40 parking fine
for spending too long in a council car park. He
could not leave because the local authority in
Mablethorpe, Lincs, had closed surrounding roads
for a carnival.
But as he stood by his vehicle and waited for the
floats to trundle by, a warden slapped a ticket
on his windscreen. Robert said, When I
complained they basically said tough luck. |
Care
worker Frank Freeman was penalised £50 for
putting his rubbish out an hour early in the
morning in Birmingham. He said, I
complained but the council didnt want to
know.
Jean Smith, of Walworth, South London, was fined
£50 for not having a disabled badge on her car.
But that was because the window had been smashed
and the badge stolen. |
|
|
MADNESS
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
BIODEGRADABLE
BIN BAGS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE
Lynn Sellors returned home to find that binmen
had removed two full bags from her compost bin and left
them on her doorstep. When she rang the city council to
complain she was told that, despite being specially
designed to biodegrade, the bags were not suitable for
the bin, which accepts garden compost, cardboard and
food. A council spokeswoman said that it was hard to
distinguish at a glance between ordinary plastic bags and
environmentally-friendly biodegradable ones.
Mrs Sellors said that she had chosen to put her food
waste in degradable bags so as to could avoid smells and
leaks. She said, "Although I've been wrapping my
food in newspapers, I am aware there is a smell and there
is some leakage, so I have to clean my bin each time it
is emptied. When I saw the biodegradable bags, I thought
they were an excellent idea. Using them would make sure
that I won't get maggots or flies. I know that a lot of
people have suffered with the two-week collections,
especially during the summer."
The council spokeswoman added, "Although in this
particular case the bags may have been biodegradable, the
people collecting the compost waste do not have the time
to sift through all the bags and there is no way of
knowing whether they are biodegradable or not. Any
plastic bag found in the brown bins will be taken out or
just not collected. We applaud Mrs Sellors' sentiments
and it is good that people use biodegradable bags for
regular waste, as that is better for landfills."
(Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Oct/07)
NOT
DISABLED ENOUGH
Stephen Twigg, who had one arm amputated owing
to cancer, applied to Derby City Council for Blue Badge
which would allow him to park closer to shopping areas.
The council told him he did not meet the necessary
criteria. The DVLA withdrew his driving licence but Mr
Twigg was keen to be independent and attended a mobility
roadshow, where he discovered a way to adapt a car so
that he could drive again.
He bought a car and took out an £800 loan to have the
system, featuring a steering knob and infra-red keypad,
installed. The DVLA reinstated his licence and he was
able to drive again. Mr Twigg knew that he would have
trouble carrying shopping over long distances and would
benefit from a Blue Badge. But the council, following
Government guidelines, refused his application. There are
various criteria on which people are judged to determine
their eligibility for a badge.
Those who are registered blind, receive a higher rate of
the mobility component of the disability living
allowance, are on a war pensioner's mobility supplement,
have a "permanent and substantial disability"
or who have difficulty walking, all qualify. Although Mr
Twigg receives disability living allowance, the level of
benefit he receives is not great enough for him to
qualify for a badge.
A council spokeswoman said, "Obviously we sympathise
with Mr Twigg and his situation. The guidelines we use
have been given to us by the Government." Amarjit
Raju, chief executive of Disability Direct, said, "I
do know of cases where Derby City Council has actually
issued badges to people like Mr Twigg, so perhaps it's up
to their discretion. I think he should be given a badge
because people with upper body disabilities have mobility
problems and it's very hard for them to carry
things." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph)
CAR
WASH
A dispute over a £300,000 Derby car wash has finally
been resolved. The owners of Wash World in Stanhope
Street, Normanton, faced having to take down large
sections of their new car wash after councillors
threatened to take enforcement action against them.
Derby City Councils planning sub-committee said
that the building was in breach of planning regulations.
Councillors had given their approval to a car wash
building of a brick design. But when it opened, council
officers noticed it had been constructed mainly from
yellow and blue steel cladding.
Now the threat has finally been lifted after the car
washs owners, Spinder Ghuman and Santkh Dosanth,
had brick-design cladding placed around the building.
Council officers have given their approval to the
buildings new look.
Mr Ghuman and Mr Dosanth collected a 550-signature
petition protesting at the councils threat to take
enforcement action. At a planning sub-committee meeting
held on the issue, the then planning chairman, Councillor
Sara Bolton, said she had received threats on her
answerphone over the issue.
She had earlier called the building an
eyesore and said it did not fit in with its
surroundings, which include Normanton Mills.
COUNCIL
BENCH MYSTERY
A bench mysteriously appeared on the corner of
Locko Road and West Road in Spondon. From the bemused
residents to Derby City Council, who many people believed
were responsible, no-one knew where the bench had come
from. But the Evening Telegraph solved the mystery
following a tip-off from a resident who claimed that the
city council was, in fact, responsible for the bench.
The Telegraph contacted the council and, a couple of
telephone calls later, the authority admitted its mistake
and said that it was, in fact, responsible for installing
the bench. Theresa Knight, from the council, said that it
was sometimes hard to track down who was responsible for
a specific job because the council was such a diverse
organisation providing a wide range of services.
Mrs Knight said, "Residents' queries on who'd put
the bench there had initially gone to the highways
maintenance section. They didn't know anything about it,
so they checked with their contractors, who also didn't
know about it. The query was then passed on to sports and
leisure, to the parks section and also to community
organisations, who also denied all knowledge."
It turned out that the responsible party was the property
services department, which looks after council-owned
buildings. The bench, which cost £500, replaced one that
had been taken away four months previously because it had
been badly vandalised. The Mayor of Derby, Councillor
Peter Berry, had requested the bench on behalf of older
residents.
Eddie Spencer, a member of Spondon Village Improvement
Committee, said, "It's unbelievable. The left hand
doesn't seem to know what the right hand's doing. But it
had to be the council as no-one else goes around putting
holes in the ground and installing benches."
Mr Spencer said that the seat had already been slightly
damaged but the improvement group had remedied this with
some sandpaper. However, later that day, a council
contractor van pulled up, removed the bench and then
filled in the gap with tarmac. Derby City Council said
the reason the bench was removed was because it had been
vandalised for the third time in the same week and was no
longer safe to be used.
Councillor Berry said, "The concrete cement that
holds it in had not set and someone had pulled the bench
out. In my opinion it would have collapsed if someone had
sat on it. Council workers have had to take it away to
repair it and they will put it back, this time with a
cement that hardens faster."
|
|
|