LEAVE OUR COUNTRY ALONE!!!
By Bert Howerly

Blunkett's treachery seemingly knows no bounds when it comes to turning the UK into an asylum slumland. His actions to give amnesty to 50,000 asylum seekers (most of which were deportation dodgers in the first place, including a 'fagin' mother who still sends her children out on pickpocketing sprees whilst she receives free housing and benefits for herself and her children) is a disgrace and an insult to decent people. But since this amnesty, Blunkett is now indicating another, implying an additional amnesty to illegal immigrants if they are agreeable to being included in a future identity card scheme. This is tantamount to plea bargaining. Why should immigrants be given the right to plea-bargain away their illegal deeds.

You may also be aware of Blunkett's recent declaration that "there is no obvious upper limit to the numbers of immigrants coming to the UK," and that "an annual influx of 170,000 is sustainable on a permanent basis", arguing that "immigrants are good for this country" (is this man stuck in a time-warp, or is he insane!) Undoubtedly, Blunkett's support of asylum seekers (otherwise known as economic migrants) to date, contrary to the interests of the nation, amounts to no less than treason! As far as mass asylum is concerned, there are social, as well as economic factors to consider. For example, it is a fact that two million years of evolution has failed to convert Albanians, Bosnians, Rumanians and the like from a feudal sub-culture society, engaging in primitive tribal warfare, into civilised people.

There never seems to be any credible reason for any of their conflicts, and if they can't find another country to fight with, then they find a reason to fight amongst themselves. Furthermore, the fact that huge numbers from the Eastern Bloc countries feel so compelled on a continual basis to illegally invade other nations en-masse, clearly demonstrates that these people possess a worrying criminal mentality. They seem motivated by primeval instinct, and all looking like reject Cuban revolutionaries. But once having set foot in a foreign land (after having travelled there by stowing away in the back of trucks or by storming the channel Tunnel etc.), they treat it as their own possession (and look what a dirty place they even managed to turn Switzerland into, and in record time!).

It is no wonder that such people engage in criminal activities once they have swamped this country. The examples are endless, such as illegal employment, drug-trafficking, prostitution, black-marketeering etc., and when was the last time you had your car radio stolen by an Albanian? One has to realise that what clearly seems illegal or immoral to us does not necessary seem so to them. These are generally lawless people, and statistics show a clear link between immigration and crime. We are not responsible for their evolutionary cycle, nor should we care about it. Unfortunately, they sadly do bring their sub-culture mentality with them into the foreign lands they invade like a plague of rats, worsening every place they tread. People such as these always inevitably create an erosion of society.

Economically, asylum seekers drain the public purse, and Joe Public always ultimately has to foot the bill for the many £billions these vultures cost the country. Both local and central government cunningly factor these costs into the council tax, as well as into tobacco and drink taxes etc. So in the end, we wind up paying the cost for asylum out of our own pockets. The government, however, seems to wish to promote a cheap labour force which immigrants are only too willing to support. (One has to realise that wages are relative. Take for example the fact that Hungarians earn only one third of an Austrian's wage, and that Rumanians earn only one half of that).

So whatever the Rumanians, Bosnians etc. earn over here by way of under-the-counter cheap labour payments, this might seem like a King's ransom to them. A cheap labour market will drive down wages and consequently our standard of living, with poverty for us lurking around the corner. A leaked secret document revealed that asylum seekers actually receive wonderful incentives to live here, such free TV's + paid-up licence + furnishings + other free goodies, that we, would have to pay for out of our own pockets. No wonder these transient bogus asylum-seeking opportunists flock here like a storm of leeching vampires. Most of them even come from UN-declared 'safe' countries.

So why don't we refuse to allow them applying for asylum from such countries in the first place. How can they be allowed to claim asylum from a safe country? It is doubtful that it is within the intention of the 1951 Convention to allow people to claim asylum from safe countries. Otherwise, theoretically, the French, for example, could claim, for any trumped-up reason, asylum from their own people, the German's from theirs, the Spanish from theirs, or the Portuguese and Italians from theirs etc. etc. etc (you get my meaning!!). It is also doubtful as to whether the 1951 Convention is actually legally binding. It is merely a Convention, not an act of Parliament, and should be cautiously applied within the intended framework it was drafted.

Regarding asylum, this surely was intended asylum applications from people from UNSAFE countries only. A certain amount of trust always applies to conventions. Only in more recent times did the bogus asylum-seeking trend as a means of illegally bypassing statutory immigration laws become an epidemic. At the time the Convention was drafted, people could be trusted to conduct themselves honestly without resorting to making bogus asylum claims. A different generation, alas! Furthermore, it is inconceivable that the Human Rights Act itself was constructed for asylum seeking from known safe countries. It is truly amazing as to how many young men from the Eastern Bloc countries come here once they become of military call-up age in their own homelands (Surprise! Surprise!)

It is also equally amazing as to how it took many others five or six years to decide that their countries were unsafe. (Phew! That must have been a difficult decision!!) Only recently did I see an asylum seeker collect £800 cash at a Post Office counter, and his friend with him collect a similar amount. About a week later I saw another asylum seeker collect £600 cash at the Post Office. Naturally, they had smiles on their faces a yard wide. However, it is not only those from the Eastern Bloc countries which are abusing the system. Numerous other country folk (some from countries nobody had ever heard of) have perfected asylum abuse down to a fine art.

It is wrong for any country's nationality and prosperity to be compromised by immigration, and it is the duty of governments to protect these principles. Anything short of this amounts to treason. If immigrants want to ruin a nation, why can't they stop at ruining their own. They are past masters at this! They should leave ours alone. Also, one must never forget the sacrifices we made. If we hadn't gone to war with Germany in 1939 over Poland, losing millions of service men and countless families in the blitzes in the process, a lot of the grandparents of these so-called asylum seekers of today would have perished under the inevitable German occupation of ALL the Eastern Bloc countries. Therefore many of the asylum seekers of today would never have been born.

But are they grateful? HELL NO! Did millions of our people really sacrifice their lives, only for their efforts and memories to now receive such ingratitude! Asylum-seekers swarming here like a plague of rats amounts to the biggest foreign invasion into this country since the Norman invasion of 1066, and they represent the biggest threat to the nation since Hitler! LEAVE OUR COUNTRY ALONE!!!
 

Back to Top