GET RID OF THE LIGHTS
The new proposals, and the cost of them, for the
Five Lamps junction and its environs, beggar
belief. There are more than enough hare-brained
traffic schemes blighting the centre of Derby at
present, but these two new ones take the biscuit.
Both of them have yet more traffic lights. The
Five Lamps junction, considering the volume of
traffic using it, was perfectly satisfactory
before traffic lights were installed. The most
sensible solution is to get rid of them. Trouble
is, our local politicians will not admit they are
wrong. Peter A. Chambers
Interestingly, the ward councillor
at the time the scheme was agreed was
Conservative leader Philip Hickson! |
ROAD
WIDENING
Traffic congestion in the Five Lamps
area could be tackled by creating additional
lanes through the junction. Highways officers at
Derby City Council have recommended that Garden
Street and Kedleston Road are both widened as
part of the controversial Connecting Derby
scheme. |
ACCIDENT
BLACKSPOT
Residents living near the Five Lamps road
junction claim £325,000 of improvements have
turned it into an accident blackspot. Councillor
Lucy Care, cabinet member for planning,
transportation and environment, said,
"Before the lights were installed, I know of
three accidents that involved pedestrians. I'm
not aware of any pedestrians who were injured
since the work was completed. One of the
priorities for doing this was to make the route
safer for pedestrians, as they're far more likely
to be seriously injured than anyone travelling in
a car." But she conceded, "These
figures aren't good news. Our council continues
to monitor accident sites and will pay particular
attention to the Five Lamps junction." |
FOURTH
LANE
Derby City Council is considering adding
a fourth lane to Duffield Road in the most badly
affected area between the Broadway pub and the
Darley Abbey post office. In their proposed plan
they are considering taking off a metre from the
city bound side (i.e. grass verges etc) to make
room for a one metre cycle track designed to
address the safety concerns raised by cyclists.
This news has met with a mixed reaction as this
scheme is now having a significant environmental
impact as well as causing safety fears. D.R.A.G.
want the council to address the route cause of
this problem which is traffic congestion from
Five Lamps.
They do not want unrealistic and unsafe schemes
to be implement in order to fire fight the
affect. Ideally D.R.A.G. believe this scheme
should be reversed and at the very least they
would like to see the scheme end at Mile Ash
Lane. Simon Bucknell |
|
|
NEW £2M PLAN FOR FIVE LAMPS
Two £2m
schemes to improve traffic congestion and cut down on
bottlenecks at one of Derby's controversial junctions
have been drawn up. The options have been put together to
change the city's Five Lamps junction, and if one of them
is backed by people in the area the scheme could get
under way in 2006. Traffic lights at the junction,
installed at a cost of £325,000, have caused uproar
among motorists who say that the tailbacks and traffic
congestion have been made worse by the new signals. And
now Derby City Council has said that it is hoping to make
further changes to the junction as part of a scheme that
has been tied in with the King Street link of the equally
controversial Connecting Derby project.
Connecting Derby will complete the inner ring road and
increase access for buses, cyclists and pedestrians. Two
new options, expected to cost between £1.5m and £2m to
put in place, have been drawn up to combat traffic
problems. Councillors and officers say that the
installation of the traffic lights at Five Lamps was only
an "interim" measure and that, now the lights
have been running for a few months, it is time to
consider a longer-term solution to ease the traffic
congestion and bottlenecks in the area.
There also appears to be confusion about how the new
lights could fit into a new scheme, as council deputy
leader Philip Hickson said that the lights could possibly
be removed. However, Lucy Care, cabinet member for
planning, transportation and environment said, "The
options for further change being considered would not
remove the lights". Councillor Hickson had said that
the lights could be removed as part of the new scheme. He
said, "There's still widespread public concern about
the Five Lamps junction and congestion in King Street.
These are two options going out to consultation to
further improve the situation. My understanding always
was that the signals were only a temporary solution
pending further alterations to the junction. When we
moved forward with this scheme, my belief was that that
would be the end of the lights."
Again the "Five
Lamps" is in the news. First it was traffic jams,
then resetting of the lights and junction rearrangements,
then a proposed new layout and now numerous accidents.
When is the council going to hold up its hands and say:
"We got it wrong". The one common sense
solution to be offered by a member of the public has been
totally rejected. That proposal is a one way system, out
of town along Kedleston Road and into town along Duffield
Road, with Broadway acting as a one-way link between the
two. A bus lane could be added to Kedleston Road into
town, encouraging commuters to take this faster route to
town, and there would still be room for on-street parking
for residents and students. The bus lane should/ought to
reduce traffic along with eliminating the rush hour
delays. So come on DCC own up, you got it wrong. R
Taylor
A temporary bus lane has
been marked on Duffield Road, Derby, between Church Lane
and Broadway which has made the road into three lanes.
People living in the area have said it is already causing
difficulties. Members of the Duffield Road Action Group
are protesting against the lane and are planning to write
to the city council to call for its removal. They have
also started a website, www.duffieldroadaction.co.uk, outlining their objections.
Simon Bucknell, who lives near to the Broadway pub, said,
"It's a nightmare when a bus and a lorry are
travelling toward the city centre and there is a car
coming the other way. I had to mount the kerb the other
day to let a lorry squeeze past. It just isn't
safe." When the city council first announced plans
for a bus lane in Duffield Road last year, it received
181 letters of objection and a 202-name petition against
the proposal from people worried the bus lanes would take
up existing parking spaces on the sides of both roads.
A city council spokeswoman said it is hoped the new lane
would encourage more people to use buses and that the
authority consulted with local residents before its
introduction. She said, "We sent out 11,000 leaflets
to people in Duffield and Darley Abbey. Exhibitions were
also held in St Benedict School and St Nicholas' Church
in Allestree, telling people about what we wanted to do.
About two weeks ago, we also gave leaflets to people in
Duffield Road and Broadway telling them the lane was
coming into effect."
The bus lane will operate for an 18-month trial period
and it will be monitored by the council. The spokeswoman
said the authority was liaising with the police to make
sure the road was monitored and that people were using
the correct lane. Work will also be carried out over the
next two weeks to install pedestrian refuges at Duffield
Road's junction with Broadway. The changes are costing
£100,000 and are funded by the Government through the
Derby Local Transport Plan. (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Feb/07)
The temporary bus lane in
Duffield Road, between Church Lane and Broadway, is to be
reviewed after three months rather than the planned 18.
It has provoked criticism from residents living nearby
who say the road is too narrow for three lanes and is now
more dangerous to use. The new layout means there is a
bus lane, one carriageway into the city and one coming
out of the city towards Duffield.
At a meeting, hosted by Duffield Road Action Group,
around 60 people attended to discuss the bus lane,
including Chris Wynn, city council cabinet member for
planning and transportation. Resident Simon Bucknell, of
Duffield Road, showed video clips of traffic using the
new road layout. He said, "There are serious
problems with the new layout. Cyclists simply do not have
enough room to use the road. If the council will not
listen to me, I will take this issue nationally."
Mr Wynn told the meeting that because of residents'
complaints the bus lane would be reviewed after three
months and not 18 months, which was the original plan. He
said that he thought the road had become a lot safer
since the introduction of the bus lane. He said,
"Before the bus lane was introduced the road had
fast-moving traffic and now the road has traffic that is
moving at a safer, slower speed. Although it seems that
it is more dangerous, it actually isn't." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Mar/07)
The Duffield Road Action
Group have learned that the temporary bus lane goes
against Department of Transport advice. Engineer Peter
Steer was called in by residents who are opposed to the
temporary bus lane. As well as the new lane for buses
travelling into Derby, there is one carriageway for other
vehicles going into the city, and one going towards
Duffield. Residents asked Mr Steer to measure the three
lanes because they believe they are now too narrow and
dangerous to drive and cycle along.
He found that outside St Benedict School the bus lane was
3.25 metres wide, the central lane measured 3.2m and the
northbound lane 3.1m. At Ferrers Way, he measured the bus
lane at 2.9m, the central lane at 3.6m and the northbound
at 2.8m. The Department of Transport has said it favours
a width of 4.5 metres for lanes used by buses and
cyclists, although it stresses that it is up to
individual councils to decide.
Cyclists say they have been clipped by buses because the
lanes are not wide enough. Double yellow lines have also
been painted along Duffield Road to stop parked cars
obstructing traffic and the speed limit has been cut from
40mph to 30mph. Residents claim the new lanes make it
difficult for them to pull out of their drives safely and
that visitors have nowhere to park because of the double
yellow lines. Council traffic control manager, Tony
Gascoigne, said, "It is less than the recommended
width but we feel the lanes are wide enough."
(Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Mar/07)
The final section of a
controversial bus lane opened on Kedleston Road, with
critics condemning it is a "joke" and "a
waste of money". The lane, which cost £130,000,
runs along the city-bound section of the busy road. The
section near Five Lamps and St Alkmund's Church has been
open for two weeks. Motorists have raised concerns about
the section towards Five Lamps, where parking spaces
reduce the width. And as the final section was opened,
one resident said that the system was "a joke"
and a waste of public money.
She said, "There are two sections, both of which
give precedence to buses of no more than about 100 yards
each time." Another said, "A road which used to
be two lanes is now three and cars have to squeeze by.
When I was riding my bike to work, cars were getting very
close to me. They had no space because of this new lane.
I will probably have to cycle on the pavement in future
because it is probably safer. There is no need for a bus
lane on Kedleston Road. Parts of it aren't wide
enough." Conservatives pledged to scrap the bus lane
in their manifesto before they took control of the city
council.
But Councillor Chris Poulter, cabinet member for
neighbourhoods, said, "Documents for the bus lane
were signed off before the Conservatives took control of
the council. The traffic regulations are now in place for
six months. We cannot scrap the bus lane immediately
because of these traffic regulations. However, we will
monitoring it over time. We have ordered a full review on
the Kedleston Road bus lane as well as many more across
the city." Alex Hornby, commercial director at Trent
Barton, hoped the lane would encourage more people to use
public transport.
He said, "Giving the bus its own lane will ensure
buses don't get caught in the rush hour traffic. Now the
traffic should be able to flow quite well." Plans
for the lane were devised when the council was controlled
by the Lib Dems. The Government paid for it. Councillor
Lucy Care, the city council's former head of transport,
said residents' concerns were considered when the plans
were drawn up. She said, "The people's main
concerns, about loss of parking, and narrow lanes, have
been addressed by not including the central section near
the shops by Cowley Street in the scheme, and doing works
to improve the road surface in some places."
(Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Jun/10)
|
|
|