BLITZ
The Government plans to spend £100million on
junk mail, despite telling companies to cut back.
Ministers' new Waste Strategy will let people opt
out from "unsolicited mail" yet a
procurement notice to the Central Office of
Information shows plans to pay £100million over
four years for "printing, data mining and
direct marketing" of Government services.
It follows the revelation that Government
spending on ads leapt 40% to £253million in the
past year.
The COI tender for the £25million-a-year deal
requires companies to "data mine" and
to "profile", or go through databases
to find people to target.
The tender notice says, "We are looking for
suppliers who are able to use data techniques to
assist COI in planning and evaluating data to aid
Government campaign activity."
It comes after the Government ordered the Direct
Marketing Association to develop an
"opt-out" system. A COI spokeswoman
said, "Government direct marketing uses data
to ensure it is targeted, relevant and timely to
minimise wastage and maximise the benefit to
people who receive it." (Source: The Sun, Feb/10) |
|
|
JUNK MAIL
Ministers say it
will be easier for people to stop junk mail being put
through letterboxes under new plans. The public will be
able to opt out from receiving unsolicited flyers by
contacting a single website rather than three different
services at the moment. Environment Secretary Caroline
Spelman said this would give people across the UK
"more control" over what they get. All adverts
will be fully recyclable in future as part of a voluntary
deal with direct marketing firms.
The average UK household receives more than 370 items of
unsolicited paper mail a year, the majority of it
unaddressed. At the moment, people seeking to block junk
mail have to register on each of the Mailing Preference
Service, the Your Choice Preference System and the Royal
Mail's Door-to-Door opt-out service. Ms Spelman said,
"We have all returned home from holidays to be
greeted by a mountain of unwanted, unsolicited mail
waiting behind the front door
From next April, people will be able to contact a single
website to get this done. Ms Spelman said junk mail
"irritated" recipients, was often a waste of
money for the advertisers concerned and was
environmentally unsustainable. She said, "We have
all returned home from holidays to be greeted by a
mountain of unwanted, unsolicited mail waiting behind the
front door, most of which is thrown straight out."
She added, "That is why I have struck this deal with
the Direct Marketing Association to give people more
control over what gets posted through their letterbox but
also to make sure that direct mail we do find useful is
produced to higher standards." Ministers pledged a
crackdown on junk mail as part of its waste review
announced in June. This committed the UK to ultimately
move to a "zero waste economy".
As part of the agreement, all direct mail will have to be
made from fully recyclable material in the future. At the
moment, about 80% of mail is compliant. Ms Spelman also
urged companies posting flyers for takeaway restaurants
and other services to respect people who have 'no junk
mail' signs on their doors. "This throws down the
gauntlet to those companies... to only deliver what
people want," she added.
Officials say people should complain to the Direct
Marketing Association, the trade body for the industry,
or the Office of Fair Trading if they continue to receive
mail after requesting not to. The Direct Marketing
Association said its goal was to "eliminate"
unwanted mail. It said it would seek to persuade more
firms to use "suppression lists", which follow
people's opt-out requests, and stop mail being delivered
to addresses once inhabitants have moved or died.
Mike Lordan, the organisation's chief of operations,
said, "We know that many types of advertising mail
are welcomed by customers such as supermarket discount
offers. Of course, untargeted and irrelevant advertising
mail is not welcome. We are keen to ensure people are
able to make an informed choice about whether or not they
want to receive advertising mail." (Source: BBC News, Nov/11)
Blame local authorities and government
agencies for the mountain of junk mail that falls on your
doormat. They rake in £50m a year by selling the
personal information they keep on your household. This
information, your address, who you live with, how much
you paid for your home and how long you've lived there,
is gold dust to banks, insurers, credit card companies
and utilities providers seeking customers. A credit card
company will pay up to £50,000 for access to every
electoral roll, for instance. The overall volume of
direct mail being sent by private companies has ballooned
by 87% in the past ten years. In 2004, more than four
billion items were posted to households.
There are ways to reduce the amount of unsolicited
marketing calls and junk mail that you receive, but it is
difficult to block it completely. You can make a start by
ticking a box the next time you fill in the electoral
roll form. It states that you do not want your data to be
passed on to third parties. Mike Hare, managing director
of a privacy service My Right To Be Private, says this
alone will do little to help. "The tick-box on
electoral roll forms was only introduced a few years
ago," he points out. "Many people are already
on thousands of marketing lists, so even if the local
authorities stop passing on your details in new lists, it
isn't difficult for marketing companies to cross check
with other databases to find out that you still live at
the same address."
Signing up to the mail, phone, fax and e-mail preference
services is free. It takes about a month to become
active, but it puts you on a register that states you do
not want to receive unsolicited marketing mail, calls,
faxes or e-mails. All companies are obliged to check the
phone and fax preference registers and are forbidden by
law to contact names and numbers on it. However, it
cannot prevent randomly generated marketing calls made by
computers or calls from companies based outside the UK.
Also, the mail preference service is not compulsory and
some companies will ignore it. "The only sure-fire
way to stop junk mail is to call the companies directly
and ask them to take you off their mailing list,"
says Hare, whose firm charges £16.99 to do this for
consumers.
Credit card company Capital One, one of the biggest
senders of junk mail among financial companies, spent
£61m on advertising in the year to April 2005, according
to a survey by Nielsen Media. Its next rival in
expenditure terms is card firm MBNA, which spent £46m in
the same period. Estimates suggest that 60% of this cash
went towards direct mailing. Capital One's mailings,
which are frequently criticised for recklessly
encouraging borrowers to take on unaffordable debts,
usually include gimmicks such as fake plastic cards and
ballpoint pens. (Source: Mail on Sunday)
Out of a
staggering 3.4 billion pieces of junk mail delivered a
year, 750 million goes straight into the bin unopened.
The worst offenders in 2005 were MBNA, ahead of
Lloyds-TSB, and Capital One. However, mail order
catalogue companies and charities are also spending huge
sums on pointless mailshots which irritate millions.
Names like Direct Wines, Saga and Reader's Digest are
also high the mailshot league as are Cancer Research UK
and the animal welfare charity, IFAW.
The figures make clear that the junk mail industry is at
the centre of astonishing waste, both in terms of the
cost of postage and printing and handling the rubbish it
creates. Research was carried out by Marketing magazine
and Nielsen Media Research which monitored how 10,000
households dealt with direct mail. The total value of the
junk mail market in 2005 was put at £1.87 billion for
the cost of printing and sending 3.4 billion items.
The Royal Mail has recently made clear that it is hoping
to substantially increase the amount of direct mail it
pumps through letter boxes. The company has changed the
pay and conditions of postmen to lift a restriction on
deliveries to a maximum of three items per household each
week. Marketing magazine insisted that many companies and
organisations would be delighted to discover that around
80% of unsolicited mail is at least opened. (Source: Mail on Sunday, Sep/06)
When postman
Roger Annies told residents on his round how to avoid
junk mail, bosses at the Royal Mail suspended him, and he
is now facing the sack. Mr Annies has worked as a postman
for the more than 10 years and considered his actions
part of customer service.
He decided to act after receiving dozens of complaints
from householders who were fed up with the piles of junk
mail dropping through their letter boxes everyday. So,
hoping he may have the answer to their prayers, he
delivered his own leaflet to residents in Barry, South
Wales, explaining how they could opt out of getting
mailshots known as 'door-to-door' items by filling out a
form.
Within days his local sorting office was inundated with
at least 70 completed forms demanding an end to junk
mail. Curious, his bosses decided to make a few inquiries
and discovered the leaflet produced by Mr Annies. He was
then suspended on full pay pending an investigation into
alleged misconduct.
The Royal Mail claims it can deliver junk mail to up to
27 million homes across the country every day. After
paying a minimum fee of £500 companies are charged up to
£91.80 per thousand items, with an extra £8.50 per
thousand for items that require extra folding. (Source: Mail on Sunday, Aug/06)
|
|
|