COMPULSORY
Massive fines will be imposed on people
who refuse to co-operate with the Government's
tough new ID card plans. Penalties would include
a £1,000 fine for those who fail to say they
have moved house and there would be a £2,500
fine for not signing up for the £35 card, if
made compulsory.
Civil liberties protesters who try to disrupt the
system by submitting deliberately spoiled
application forms will also be hit with a charge
of £1,000. And people found guilty of
fraudulently using an ID card will face up to 10
years in jail.
Launching the Identity Card Bill, Mr Blunkett
said ID cards combat terrorism, illegal working,
immigration abuse and abuse by foreigners of free
public services such as the NHS.
He said, "The national identity card scheme
will give people confidence, convenience and
security in an increasingly vital aspect of
modern life, proving and protecting their
identity."
But Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Mark
Oaten said the plan is "deeply flawed".
Campaign group No2ID called the plan
"pointless, expensive and an abuse of human
rights". The first cards will be issued from
2008.
They will carry details about each person such as
fingerprints or an electronic scan of the iris of
the eye. These details, with a photograph,
signature, date of birth, address and
nationality, will be stored on a central
register. (Source: Daily Mirror) |
PLANS
DROPPED
Plans for compulsory ID cards were
dropped as Tony Blair named the General Election
date. The controversial Bill to introduce the
cards, which critics said would cost at least
£10billion, was lost because of lack of
parliamentary time. |
|
|
ID CARDS
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
The UK's ID card scheme
will cost £5.4bn to set up and run over the next 10
years. Home office minister Liam Byrne confirmed ID cards
would be introduced "rapidly", starting with
biometric cards, which include fingerprints and facial
images, for foreign nationals in 2008.
He said, "Illegal working will become far more
difficult as the National Identity Scheme is rolled out.
Any employer would be able to check a person's unique
reference number against registered information about
their identity to find out whether someone is eligible to
work in the UK."
He added, "ID cards will give us a powerful tool to
combat identity fraud which underpins organised crime,
terrorism and abuse of the immigration system. ID cards
will also help transform the delivery of public services
to the citizen, making interactions swifter, more
reliable and more secure and helping to reduce costs by
eliminating wasteful duplication of effort."
(Source: BBC News, Oct/06)
Plans to incorporate an ID
card into passports or driving licences have been
scrapped by the Home Office. Instead, everyone over the
age of 18 will have to have a separate, wallet-sized
pass. The estimated price-tag of £35 means that with
£73 for a passport and £38 for a provisional driving
licence, a full set of identification will set Brits back
£146. This is on top of the £3billion cost to the
taxpayer to introduce the national ID scheme, which
involves putting scanners in hospitals, job centres,
airports and universities.
A Home Office spokesman said the decision to have a
separate ID card was taken so people could have a handy
pass to carry around rather than their passport. But Mark
Oaten, Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said,
"The cost to the public seems to escalate with every
announcement. The Government would be much better off
spending the £3billion for ID cards on getting more
police on to our streets and ensuring the intelligence
services are properly resourced to tackle
terrorism."
Home Secretary David Blunkett said the cards would leave
an "audit trail", meaning a record will be kept
every time a person's ID is scanned. He added, "Our
plans to bring in a national ID card scheme lie at the
heart of our work to ensure that the UK can meet the
challenges of a changing world. This is a long-term
project and we are determined to get it right." Spy
chiefs will be able to track people by monitoring where
and when cards are used.
The Home Office said the security services would be the
only people with access to the system. In a package of
refinements to the controversial proposals, Mr Blunkett
said the scheme will be run by a single agency attached
to the Home Office. New cards will include biometric
details of each cardholder, such as their fingerprints,
an electronic scan of their face or a scan of the iris of
their eye.
These unique features will be compared against records
held on a National Identity Register, theoretically
making the cards impossible to forge. The Government
believes the cards will help combat illegal immigration
and working, terrorism and identity fraud. MPs are
expected to vote on the scheme in the next few months.
The identity passes will be brought in within three
years.
Identity
cards were dismissed by Harold Wilson's Labour government
as expensive and ineffective and Home Secretary Roy
Jenkins also feared the cards would infringe civil
liberties. Current Labour Home Secretary Charles Clarke
has dismissed fears the cards would create a "Big
Brother" state. The ID card plan came into focus in
November 1974, after IRA pub bombings in Birmingham
killed 21 people.
Ministers were under pressure to act and Mr Jenkins was
given the task of drawing up the emergency Prevention of
Terrorism Bill. But in a frank memo to cabinet colleagues
he admitted there was a limit to what such measures could
achieve and he issued a sharp warning against responding
to the terrorist attacks by adopting ever more draconian
legislation. "It goes almost without saying that we
must guard against the danger of being driven to more and
more extreme measures involving unwarranted infringement
of personal liberty," he wrote.
In the memorandum, dated 24 November, three days after
the bombings, Mr Jenkins acknowledged that the government
had to be seen to take some action. In particular, he was
conscious of the need to avert reprisal attacks against
innocent Irish people in Britain. He said, "We are
in greater danger of justifiable criticism if we do too
little than if we do too much. We must, moreover, take
action which is firm enough to pre-empt action by
self-appointed vigilantes."
One proposal considered by Mr Jenkins was new
restrictions on travel between Ireland and the British
mainland, but he quickly concluded that a system of
"watertight control" was "not
practicable". "Nor do I see advantage in a
system of identity cards, which apart from creating
difficulties for ordinary people would be extremely
expensive and largely ineffective," he wrote.
Instead, he opted for the introduction of spot checks on
travellers, a system of exclusion orders banning
terrorist suspects from the mainland and making IRA
membership illegal.
A computer
system to run the Government's ID card scheme has been
scrapped. Home Secretary John Reid insisted the decision
was not a U-turn. He said, "Doing something sensible
isn't necessarily a U-turn. We have decided it is lower
risk, more efficient, and faster to use what already
exists, although the data will be drawn from other
sources." Ministers wanted to build a National
Identity Register costing several billion to avoid the
mistakes and duplications that plagued other computer
projects. Mr Reid said using databases at the Home
Office, Department for Work and Pensions and Passport
Service, would save money, boost efficiency and cut
fraud. (Source: Daily Mirror, Dec/06)
|
|
|