| ID Cards
Will Not Help |
WORST OF BOTH WORLDS
ID cards will have minimal effect in
stemming the appalling level of crime, which has
resulted from 40 years of the authorities
watering-down effective deterrents to serious
criminal behaviour. I think most would agree that
crime would be better contained by making an
example of the criminal minority, rather than
curtailing the civil liberties of the general
public who are their victims.
As for the terrorist threat, let us not forget
that the political charlatans promoting these
cards are the same people who sent our
ill-equipped troops to Iraq, "to make the
world safe against terrorism". In modern
Britain, we are getting the worst of both worlds.
Robert Vickers |
VICTIMISATION
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE)
said several aspects of plans for ID cards could
give the police new scope to victimise blacks and
Asians. "There is scope for police officers
to use ID cards to inconvenience ethnic
minorities unnecessarily, and authorities in
France and Germany have been accused of
discriminating against ethnic minorities with on
the spot requests for ID cards even where this is
forbidden," said a paper submitted to MPs by
the CRE.
Plans to force foreign nationals to hold the ID
cards before any other groups could also be
divisive, it warned. "The CRE is concerned
to some degree about the message this approach
sends out to the public, one that suggests that
foreigners are second-class people within
society," it went on. "This would not
promote good relations between different national
or ethnic groups."
The CRE questioned whether Mr Blunkett's plan
would achieve a stated aim of tackling illegal
immigrants and illegal working. ID cards could
instead lead to illegal immigrants leading an
"increasingly underground existence",
it suggested. CRE chairman Trevor Phillips told
the MPs that introduction of the ID cards was
likely to create a "great deal of
unease" among ethnic minorities. That's it
then, ID cards are out. |
|
|
ID CARDS
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Plans for a national ID card could
mean a record of your iris, your fingerprint or the shape
of your head being held by the state. But one way and
another, the state already holds a wealth of information
on file about us. With many functions of government
contracted out, the information held on us is spread
thinly across a large number of agencies and offices. If
you drive a car, commit a crime, pay taxes, claim
benefits, apply for a passport, buy a house, marry, have
children, die, or register to vote you are slowly
dripping titbits into the UK's information pot.
POLICE
Exactly what can and cannot be kept by the
police has been a hot topic in recent months with the
Bichard Inquiry into mistakes in the investigation of
Soham murderer Ian Huntley. The Police National Computer
mainly holds details of convictions and of the victims.
These are the kind of things that would show up in a
basic vetting search.
But for those applying for jobs with unsupervised access
to children or vulnerable people, an "enhanced"
search will also show up those suspected of a crime or
involvement with criminals, with everything from cautions
to snippets of "soft" intelligence from local
police forces on the menu.
You can apply to your local police force to find out what
they know and what is held about you on computer,
although some information might be omitted. A national
database also currently holds the DNA of 2.5 million
people convicted or suspected of crimes, with 5.5 million
fingerprints also on record.
The Home Office says the DNA database has led to 460,000
matches with samples taken during investigations. Senior
police officers want every person's DNA recorded to fight
crime, although civil rights groups oppose any such move,
saying there is a danger firms could eventually gain
access to and exploit the information.
DVLA
For those who own a car, the Driver Vehicle Licensing
Agency knows where you live. It knows if you have been
guilty of minor traffic infringements like speeding
within the last four years, and of major offences like
drink driving within 11 years. But much of its filing is
car-based rather than driver based. It knows what owners
a car has had but cannot search for a history of all the
bad buys you have made from the classifieds.
TAXMAN
Much information about you has a time limit,
with some spent convictions wiped and other snippets
deleted after a set periods. The taxman knows no such
rules. It keeps the information it takes from you until
it sees fit to destroy it. And the taxman knows plenty,
more in fact than many of your close relatives.
The Inland Revenue may know what jobs you've had, how
much you've been paid, and what you spend your money on.
It requires a court order to divulge this information,
unless the request is from the police under the Crime and
Terrorism Act. The information is also shared with the
Department of Work and Pensions so they can process
benefit claims. The DWP also passes information back to
the taxman.
How can you find out? You can get hold of the files held
by many organs of government through the guidelines based
on the Freedom of Information Act, which will come fully
into force in January, with a request costing £20. Some
departments will have lists of those people they hold
files on, but some, like the Home Office, cannot say
without a search being made. And there is no guarantee
that any file will not be restricted for security
reasons.
And then there is the electoral roll. The record of who
lives where, taken to determine voting rights, has been
the junk mail marketer's friend for many years. Now the
rules have been changed and you can disappear from the
publicly available version of the list, but not from the
list that credit agencies use to rate you. Perhaps the
area that generates the most concern is health records,
which civil liberties campaigners fear could eventually
be compromised by insurance companies and employers.
SECURITY
Assistant Information Commissioner David Smith said the
sharing of medical records with anyone other than health
professionals involved in your case would be "a
breach of the Data Protection Act and of the duty of
confidence". One exception would be if a doctor
chose to volunteer information such as if he diagnosed a
bus driver with blackouts and suspected he would not
inform his employers.
Asked whether you could get hold of your file from MI5,
Mr Smith responds, "You could try." A request
can now be made for the disclosure of files to much of
government, but Mr Smith said matters relating to
national security were excepted. "The security
services used to object, saying it would give away who
they kept information on."
Barry Hugill, of Liberty, said the major objections was
to the danger of the government rationalising all records
in a format that would not be secure. He said, "What
the government is looking at doing is transferring
numerous records, all going into a single centralised
database. This makes it less secure. Hundreds of
thousands of people will have access to private details
without good reason."
| THOSE
WHO HOLD INFORMATION ABOUT YOU |
| DVLA |
Police |
| DWP |
DfES |
| Public
Records Office |
Family
Records Office |
| Your
GP and hospital |
Home
Office |
| Inland
Revenue |
MI5? |
Next
>>>
|
|
|