GOOD RIDDANCE
I am pleased about the removal of the humps and
hope they are removed everywhere. They have
caused problems for the disabled, whiplash,
damage to vehicles and delays to emergency
services. I hope Philip Hickson looks at the Five
Lamps as there were fewer problems before all
these lights were installed.
Whatever we do, we don't seem to be able to build
anything without massive islands and roundabouts,
lights everywhere, mini-roundabouts, cycle lanes
on pavements and walkways, bends and criss-cross
traffic. All these measures have been tried time
and again and do not work.
They only cause accidents, road rage, congestion
and noise pollution. Complicated systems danger
and delays to emergency services. Speed bumps and
traffic calming kill hundreds of people a year by
delaying ambulances. One minute can make the
difference to heart patients. B.
Flood. |
MORE
CAMERAS
The Derbyshire Safety Camera Partnership is
adding Grampian Way and Boulton Lane to its list
of possible locations for mobile safety cameras.
The roads were at the centre of a controversial
traffic-calming scheme, but after a three-year
campaign by residents, Derby City Council finally
ripped out the last humps. The roads do not meet
the Government's criteria for fixed cameras but
mobile cameras can be used. They also generate
revenue, which speed humps don't. |
BLACKMAIL
Brian Coleman, the executive member for
the environment at Barnet council in north London
arranged for the removal of bus and cycle lanes
in an attempt to reduce congestion.
He said, "Everyone has worked out that speed
humps per se do not work. They cause noise,
pollution and they fail to achieve speed
reduction. There are very few councils who are
still putting them in."
As a result, Mayor Ken Livingstone and Transport
for London, suspended £370,000 of funding to
Barnet. A spokesman for Mr Livingstone said,
"Transport for London will not fund schemes
which jeopardise road safety." |
|
|
SPEED HUMPS 2
Over a thousand people living in Stanhope
Street, Upperdale Road and the Austin Estate in
Normanton, have asked the city council to reconsider the
removal of speed humps. Traffic-calming was introduced to
the Austin estate in 1994, and Stanhope Street and
Upperdale Road in 2000. Residents organised a petition
asking for traffic-calming measures to be taken down and
claimed the speed humps were dangerous and were damaging
cars.
David Gartside, council head of traffic, said, "We
don't want to dismiss people's concerns and we understand
the traffic-calming measures are too severe in some
places. But if we were to remove all the humps we would
have to put something in their place and the removal of
them would cost around £100,000 alone. I cannot really
recommend that we follow through with the request."
Normanton councillor Hardyal Dhindsa urged the council to
reconsider. He said, "The petition was signed by
people in the area who have experienced the damage the
humps can do. The council need to reconsider and remove
the road humps and replace them with more appropriate
traffic-calming measures." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Jun/06)
Despite widespread public consultation in
Boulton last year, Derby City Council is proposing to ask
residents for the third time in two years whether they
want to get rid of the humps. The move has been slammed
by campaigners as a waste of money and Independent Ron
Allen has said that he will withdraw his support of the
Lib Dem/Tory alliance if the humps are not removed. But
now the city council is proposing to spend another
£3,000 on the issue by asking people if they want the
humps removed. In 2001, there was a £10,000 independent
review into the effectiveness of the traffic calming
measures. Last year, questionnaires were sent out to
7,000 residents and as a result it was agreed to remove
some humps, modify others and consider other traffic
calming measures.
Forty-eight humps have been removed and 12 modified at a
cost of £60,000 and 86 speed humps remain. Since the May
elections - when Labour lost overall control of the city
council - no work has been carried out and it is
estimated it would cost £75,000 to finish what was
planned by the former Labour-run council. But the Lib
Dem/Tory alliance is suggesting that the public should be
consulted again because the questionnaire that was sent
out before was not clear enough. Lucy Care, cabinet
member for planning, transportation and environment, said
that the previous questionnaire sent out to residents was
not clear enough and that the decision by the city
council in February was taken before Mr Allen, who stood
on the single issue of removing speed humps, was
re-elected.
She said the election result may have shown that people
wanted to get rid of the humps, but it was not
conclusive. She said, "I think the conclusions that
were reached from the last consultation were reasonable,
but there was not a clear question that said 'do you want
the speed humps to go?' and by consulting again we can
ask clear cut, concise questions. I think it would be
foolish to spend £75,000 on something that has been
approved as it doesn't seem to be clear cut." Before
the Lib Dem/Tory alliance came into power Maurice
Burgess, now leader of the city council, said the humps
would be removed as soon as possible.
Now he says, "We have got to be able to justify the
removal of the humps. We hope, if the public want it,
that the humps will be gone during the autumn." Mr
Allen said, "If they consult again it is an absolute
waste of time and money. I have been assured by the
cabinet the speed humps are coming out and if they don't
then I would withdraw my support for the alliance."
Thelma Bradshaw, secretary of the Community Road Users'
Independent Steering Executive (Cruise), said, "I
think it is a waste of money. The people have made it
clear what they want."
Chris Williamson, leader of the Labour group, said,
"This is a waste of public money. It's not a large
amount of money, but it is the principle of it. The
people have made it quite clear what they want both
through the consultation and the ballot box." Philip
Hickson, leader of the city Conservative group and deputy
leader of the city council, said, "Our commitment is
the same as it was before the election - the speed humps
in Boulton must be removed and we're moving towards that,
taking the appropriate measures which are required
legally. In the view of officers, the previous
consultation was defective, so we need to make sure that
we get it right. The purpose of this consultation is to
make sure that we're on track with what people actually
want."
This is the latest chapter in the long-running saga that
began in 2000 when the Labour-run city council installed
speed humps in Boulton and Sinfin costing £236,000. A
residents group - Community Road Users' Independent
Steering Executive - was set up and Labour lost a seat on
the city council in May, 2002, when Hardyal Dhindsa was
ousted in favour of Ron Allen, who stood on the
single-issue of speed humps and also retained his seat in
this year's elections. The review in late 2002, when
7,000 questionnaires were sent out, proved controversial
after the council was forced to print an extra 6,000
re-drafted copies following complaints over the wording
of the questions.
There were 2,306 replies with 75% of people saying they
wanted some form of traffic calming and 59 % of people
wanting the speed humps removed. In February, the city
council said it would remove and modify the humps. The
situation at the moment is that all the humps have been
removed in Grampian Way and the humps in Boulton Lane,
between its junction with Crayford Road and Harvey Road,
have been removed. The speed humps in Holbrook Road,
between its junction with Bembridge Drive and Field Lane,
have been lowered and modified and selected other humps
have been removed.
The total cost of the speed humps issue in Boulton is
around £427,400. £236,000 to install 146 humps in
Sinfin and Boulton in 2000, £60,000 to remove 48 humps
and modify 12 in April as well as £6,400 on three
questionnaires. Philip Hickson, deputy leader of the
council, said, "We're acting on a commitment that we
made before the election that we'll remove the humps if
that is what people want. If the cabinet agrees, we would
hope the humps would be removed by the end of the
year." If the cabinet agrees? How
many more times do they need to be told?
Members of Derby City Council's cabinet agreed to go
ahead with taking out the remaining 86 humps. About 5,000
questionnaires were sent out to residents in the Boulton
ward and there was a total of 1,527 replies. Of those,
74% said they wanted the humps to be removed.
Conservative deputy leader Philip Hickson said, "In
my view, this was a huge waste of public money, which I
put down to the Labour administration. They ploughed
ahead with what they thought was best without proper
consultation, but this report should serve as a lesson
that we, as councillors, don't know best and that we need
to consult. Hopefully, this will now restore the
confidence of the public." We shall see.
<<< Prev
|
|
|