DEFECTION
Hardial Dhamrait declared his move to the Tory
party at a council meeting. He said he had made
the decision because he felt the Labour Party was
not acting in the best interests if his
constituents. |
|
|
HARDIAL SINGH DHAMRAIT
Hardial Singh
Dhamrait, a Labour member for the Sinfin ward, was
investigated for allegedly trying to influence a council
decision in which he had a personal interest. It followed
an investigation by the Standards Board for England into
allegations by a member of the public that Mr Dhamrait
had failed to declare an interest and "sought
improperly to influence a decision on the matter".
The inquiry was conducted by an ethical standards officer
from the Standards Board, the body that investigates
allegations of unethical conduct in local government. The
officer referred his evidence to the city council's
standards committee, which will decide whether there has
been a breach of the authority's Code of Conduct.
Labour leader Chris Williamson said that the allegation
related to a planning application which was considered by
the planning control committee, of which Mr Dhamrait was
a member at the time. Mr Williamson said, "If there
was a fault, it was that he didn't seek clarification on
whether he needed to declare that he lived in the
vicinity of the application."
He added, "But, he didn't vote on the matter and
felt he had done as much as he needed to by abstaining.
It's arguable whether there was an interest that needed
to be declared." The standards committee is
comprised of three councillors and four members of the
public and has the power to suspend a member of the
council for up to three months.
A report by ethical standards officer Nick Marcar
revealed that the application related to the development
of a site in Chain Lane, Littleover, which partially
borders Mr Dhamrait's Burton Road home, although there is
another property in between. The report says Mr Dhamrait,
who was then a member of the planning control committee,
spoke on issues relating to the development during the
meeting without declaring an interest.
He told the investigation he did not believe he had a
personal interest. But Mr Marcar concluded,
"Councillor Dhamrait sought improperly to influence
a decision about the development application by staying
in the meeting and participating in the committee's
discussion."
The report will be considered by the council's standards
board when it will decide whether or not to take any
action against him. It can suspend councillors for up to
three months. Mr Dhamrait said, "My conscience is
clear. I still feel I have done nothing wrong. I'm more a
community worker than a professional politician."
Hardial Singh Dhamrait faced a hearing of the council's
standards committee, which agreed he had failed to comply
with the code of conduct and censured him, which means he
will be reprimanded in a letter, which will be published
in the press.
|
|
|