| Parking Concerns |
ACCESS
We can assure patients and visitors a car parking
space on site when they visit the hospital. This
is because Car Park 2 by Maternity is dedicated
to patient and visitor use only. Staff are now
parking across the road in a dedicated staff car
park, which means less congestion for vehicles
accessing the site.
We appreciate that car parking is limited to the
"Maternity" end of the hospital, so we
have arranged for portering and wheelchair
services for those needing help to get to the
other end of the hospital.
We are looking at ways to provide this service
from the Uttoxeter Road end of the hospital by
Trust Headquarters. In response to patient
feedback, a new reception will also be provided
shortly at the Maternity entrance to help offer
advice to patients and visitors.
For those patients without their own transport,
there are frequent bus services which come to the
Hospital from the city centre - the 'Mickleover
Flyer' run by Trent Buses, and the 'Health
Hopper' (30, 30A, 31 and 31A) run by Arriva.
The Health Hopper service also drops people off
directly outside both our main hospital entrances
at each end of the Derby City General Hospital
site. We have also made some improvements in the
signage around site, and further improvements are
still taking place.
Jo Yeaman, Communications and PR
Manager, Southern Derbyshire Acute Hospitals NHS
Trust. |
MATERNITY MOVE
DELAYED
A maternity unit set to open at Derby City
General Hospital is behind schedule. The
maternity and gynaecology department was due to
open in early November but the move had been
delayed by five weeks "to make the building
100% right for patients and staff".
A spokeswoman for Derby Hospitals NHS Trust said
the completion of the new hospital was still on
target and all facilities will be transferred
from the DRI to the new building by the end of
2008. (Source: BBC News, Oct/07) |
|
|
SUPERHOSPITAL
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
The new hospital, which is being built at
the Derby City General Hospital site, is now set to be
160,000 square metres in size, nearly 20,000 square
metres more than in the plan submitted to Derby City
Council last year. The extra space has been incorporated
in the design by utilising more space on the fifth floor
as well as increasing the accommodation on the
underground levels. The layout of the hospital has only
been adjusted slightly, with the main change concerning
the Kings Treatment Centre, an outpatient department,
which is significantly larger than before.
The larger hospital will also accommodate a multi-faith
centre and will allow for future growth of hospital
services, including medical advancements. Janet Moore, of
Jackson Avenue, who is the secretary of the residents'
liaison group set up to monitor the hospital's
development, said she feared that the size increase would
mean more patients at the hospital. "I feel it's
dreadful, to be honest," she said. "They're
already predicting 687,000 patient visits per year by
2008. Does that mean they're increasing the facilities so
even more people come?"
And Derby city councillor Lucy Care, who lives on Kings
Drive and is cabinet member for planning, transportation
and the environment, said, "If the hospital is going
to be larger and, as a result, there are more people
coming and going, then one thing we need to look at is
the travel implications." Brian Ibell, assistant
chief executive of Southern Derbyshire Acute Hospitals
NHS Trust, which will run the hospital, said that the
increase in size would not mean more patients but would
create improved facilities for patients. "Patients
using the hospital should really be able to see the added
benefits that these latest improvements will bring",
said Mr Ibell.
He said that the larger development also reflected the
need to provide additional resources to support the new
medical school, which will train 90 doctors each year.
The disclosure about the size comes just weeks after the
disclosure that the superhospital would cost taxpayers
about £1.2bn. Dr Simon Elliott, consultant radiologist
at the trust's imaging departments, said that he was
pleased that space was being provided for future medical
advances. "If we don't plan for it now and build a
hospital without the space, it would be incredibly
difficult to put it in afterwards and that would be a
major disadvantage to patients in Derby," he said.
The contract to build the £333m project has
been signed and the multi-million pound deal between
Southern Derbyshire Acute Hospitals Trust and Skanska
Innisfree, the private consortium which will build and
maintain the hospital, assures the project will now be
completed as planned by 2008. And with the deal now being
finalised, more details including the entire cost of the
superhospital project and the facilities which will be on
offer have now emerged. For the first time, it has been
revealed that the total cost of the project, which will
centralise hospital service onto the Derby City General
Hospital site, will be £1.56bn.
The scheme will see the Derbyshire Royal Infirmary turned
into a community hospital. The developer has raised the
initial capital cost of £333m for the actual building of
the superhospital, which has risen from £53m when the
project was first proposed in August, 1997, through the
Stock Market. But as the consortium will maintain the
building and supply services such as catering, cleaning
and portering, over a 40-year period the total cost of
the project is over £1.5bn. The trust will pay the total
cost back to the developers over a 40-year period at an
annual cost of £39m.
This is an extra £12m a year from what the Trust
currently pays and this has been pledged by Southern
Derbyshire's five primary care trusts, who fund hospital
services via the Government. In return, Derby will boast
the largest PFI hospital in the country in floor space,
covering 155,000 square metres, which is the equivalent
of 40 football pitches. It will be substantially bigger
than both the DRI and City Hospital to cope with the
687,000 expected patient visits every year, an increase
of 87,000. There will be a total of 7,500 rooms with
1,159 beds - which is 50 more than there are now - and an
additional nine operating theatres, taking the total to
35, as well as 9,000 new pieces of equipment.
The new medical school, which is due to open later this
month, will also make the hospital the biggest medical
teaching facility in the region. Hospital managers
believe that these additional facilities will not only
improve healthcare across Southern Derbyshire, but also
reduce waiting times for operations. Trust chief
executive Julie Acred said, "This is great news for
our staff, our patients and the community we served. The
development will bring extensive benefits to the
population of Southern Derbyshire, not only from a
patient perspective, but also in terms of increasing the
number of jobs locally and contributing positively
towards the local economy."
Dr Kathy McLean, medical director at the trust, said the
reason the cost had increased over the years was because
more facilities had been added. She said, "The
project has grown since we started out designing it and,
therefore, the costs have increased. We have not
compromised on clinical space and, therefore, you have to
pay for it." Building the new hospital on an
existing site has taken complex planning. To enable work
to begin on phase one of the project, which will see half
of the new building and the Kings Treatment Centre
constructed, patients and buildings will have to move.
The urology department is the first unit to
be transferred as part of the redevelopment of the Derby
City General Hospital site. Health bosses have said the
new hospital, which will have 35 operating theatres, will
cut waiting times and allow more patients to be treated.
All facilities from Derbyshire Royal Infirmary (DRI) will
be transferred to the new building by the end of 2008.
Part of the DRI's London Road site will be sold off and
other parts may be used for community health facilities.
The scheme has been funded by the private sector, with
the NHS leasing the facility for 35 years and builders
have been working on the project for nearly two years.
(Source: BBC News, Mar/06)
|
|
|