| MPs |
| ATTEMPT
TO CONCEAL |
| MPs
LETTERS |
| NAMES
& CLAIMS |
| MPs ARE
VICTIMS |
| UNTOUCHABLE |
| WIFE
SWAP TO BEAT JOBS BAN |
| SPENDING
SPREE |
| MPs
PAY-OFFS |
NEW RULING
MPs have made a ruling that they can claim
expenses without showing receipts which means
they can submit £93million of expenses without
public scrutiny.
Details of MPs claims for plasma
televisions, furniture and cleaning bills will be
kept secret after Harriet Harman caved in to
backbenchers pressure to stop expenses
claims being published.
MPs are to pass a new law that will exempt them
from parts of the Freedom of Information Act,
meaning they'll never again be forced to publish
receipts for their claims, in defiance of an
order by the High Court.
This will make MPs the only public sector
employees with special privileges to protect them
from disclosing their expenses. |
TERRIFIED
Three Labour MPs are said to be terrified that
the release of their expenses claims will expose
them as adulterers and financial cheats.
Four ministers are also understood to have warned
party whips they might have to resign for abusing
the system, when MPs' receipts are published
before the summer recess. |
BURDENSOME
Michael Martin, the Commons Speaker, said,
It has been argued that it would be
excessively burdensome for Members to have
provided receipts for all transactions and that
additional costs incurred . . . would be likely
disproportionate. |
SYSTEM TO BE
SCRAPPED
Gordon Brown plans to scrap MPs' expenses. He
wants to introduce a Brussels-style daily
allowance system which could see them get as much
as £174 a day for accommodation and £86 for
meals on top of their £64,000 basic salary.
That could see them pocket up to £260 a day
extra just for turning up. The £24,000-a-year
second homes allowance would be scrapped and MPs
would no longer be able to claim for furniture,
TVs, council tax and other perks.
However, with the Commons sitting for 150 days a
year, this new allowance could work out at
£39,000 a year for each MP, which is £15,000
more than present system. |
QUOTE OF THE DECADE
Harriet Harman attempted to suggest that Commons
officials were at fault, rather than MPs. She
said the onus was not on politicians to submit
legitimate expenses but on the Parliamentary
authorities to police the claims! |
PAYBACK TIME
Ronnie Campbell, Labour MP for Blyth Valley,
agreed to repay £6,000 of expenses which he used
to buy furniture for his London flat. He admitted
that his behaviour had been "miles out of
order". (Source: Daily Telegraph, May/09) |
|
|
MPs EXPENSES
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
Commons accounts show that the taxpayer was
hit with a bill of £95.48 million for MPs' expenses,
travel, pensions, allowances and staffing costs in
2006/07, up from £90.475 million in the previous year.
This was a rise of £4.973 million, or 5.5%. The
additional cost allowance, which MPs can put towards
interest payments on a mortgage for a second home, rent
or hotel bills, rose from £10.866 million to £11.447
million, an increase of 5.3%. Staffing allowances went up
from £50.695 million to £53.274 million as MPs took on
more office workers, a rise of £2.579 million, or 5.1%
and travel expenses rose from £5.994 million to £6.253
million, an extra £259,000 or 4.3%. MPs have also voted
to give themselves a £10,000-a-year communications
allowance from April this year. (Source: Daily Mail, Jul/07)
Ministers have defended their expenses
claims saying all were made within the rules. Downing
Street says there was "nothing wrong" with
Gordon Brown's £6,500 claim to pay his brother for a
cleaner. Lord Mandelson, who claimed £2,850 for his
home, before quitting as an MP and selling it for a large
profit, said the claims were for essential repairs.
Police have been asked to probe how the details were
leaked to a newspaper. The newspaper also says the
Commons authorities had planned to blank out the
addresses of MPs, potentially concealing the way some had
regularly changed homes in order to maximise their
income.
Scotland Yard said in a statement, "The
Metropolitan Police can confirm we have received a
request from the House of Commons to investigate the
alleged unauthorised disclosure of information relating
to members' allowances. We are currently considering
their request." A spokesman for the House claimed
that there were "reasonable grounds to believe a
criminal offence may have been committed". He said,
"The House authorities have received advice that
there are reasonable grounds to believe a criminal
offence may have been committed in relation to the way in
which information relating to members' allowances has
been handled."
Cabinet Minister Shaun Woodward, claimed 38p
for a Muller Crunch Corner yogurt and £1.06 for a pizza
from Asda in St Helens in November 2004, which the MP
recovered under the category of staff subsistence.
Receipts from an office supplier show that Woodward has
regular orders for Family Circle biscuits at £7.18 a
tin; Gold Blend coffee at £11.22 a tin; Tetley teabags
at £3.85 for a box of 440; and Diet Coke, costing
£12.56 for each case of 24 cans. A Labour MP claimed 5p
for an Ikea carrier bag in his Scottish constituency. One
Tory MP claimed £35 every three months for a mole
catcher at his country home, another Tory claimed £160
each year to have his Aga serviced and another Tory
billed £3.99 for ant killer from Homebase. A male Tory
claimed £1.11 a piece for two packs of Tampax in 2005.
MPs have been told that there's little
chance of securing a prosecution in the hunt for the mole
who passed on details of MPs expenses, despite the
Commons calling in police. They've been told that the
person who duplicated the vast volume of MPs
invoices and other material had committed a breach of
contract but not a criminal offence. Also, it's unlikely
there's been a breaching of the data protection
legislation. Under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act,
the sale of personal information is unlawful unless there
is a public interest defence. Lawyers believe the
information cannot be deemed personal because the High
Court and Information Tribunal ordered its release last
year and a strong public interest defence could be
argued.
Patrick McLoughlin, the Conservative chief
whip in charge of auditing Tory expenses, claimed £3,000
to have new windows fitted at his second home. Steve
McCabe, a Labour whip, over-claimed on his mortgage by
£4,059. Diana Johnson, Labour assistant whip, spent
£1,000 of taxpayers money to hire an architect for
a decorating project at her second home. Helen Goodman,
assistant government whip, claimed for a weeks stay
in a holiday cottage in her constituency. (Source: Daily Telegraph, May/09)
Four of Gordon Brown's ministers are exposed
for milking the parliamentary MPs' expenses system and
pushing their claims to the limit. The Daily Telegraph's
files show that Barbara Follett, the Tourism Minister;
Phil Woolas, the Immigration Minister; Ben Bradshaw, the
Health Minister; and Phil Hope, the Care Services
Minister, have exploited the MPs' expenses system.
The questionable expense claims of two former ministers,
Keith Vaz and Barry Gardiner, are also disclosed. They
come after this newspaper published suspect claims made
by 13 members of the Cabinet. The details of their claims
has resulted in an outpouring of public anger over the
MPs' expenses system with calls for immediate reform.
The Cabinet ministers involved, including Jack Straw and
Lord Mandelson, have refused to apologise but instead
criticised the parliamentary expenses system. The latest
disclosures show that the expenses scandal goes beyond
the Cabinet and implicates the entire Government. The
Daily Telegraph has been shown details of expense claims
made by MPs from all the main political parties and is
planning to publish a series of articles exposing how the
system is being exploited by dozens of MPs.
Parliamentary rules stipulate that MPs must ensure that
there are "no grounds for a suggestion of a misuse
of public money". However, The Daily Telegraph files
show some ministers have pushed the limits of the scheme.
Barbara Follett,
the multi-millionaire Tourism Minister, claimed for
private security patrols outside her London home costing
more than £25,000. The parliamentary fees office, which
is supposed to monitor claims, warned Mrs Follett that
her claims may appear "excessive" if made
public, but she was not deterred, saying she felt unsafe
in Soho after being mugged.
Keith Vaz, the
former minister who now chairs the Home Affairs select
committee, bought and furnished a flat in central London
at taxpayers' expense despite living just 12 miles away
with his wife in a £1.15 million property. He claimed
more than £75,000 for the flat. Mr Vaz also changed his
designated second home for a single year to a property he
owns in his Leicester constituency. During this year,
2007-08, he claimed £1,000 for a table and chairs, £750
on new carpets, and £2,614 for a pair of leather
armchairs. He also claimed for 22 cushions, including 17
made from silk costing £15 each. During the course of
the year he rented out his London flat.
Margaret Moran,
the Labour MP for Luton, spent £22,500 of taxpayers'
money treating dry rot at her and her husband's seaside
house 100 miles from her constituency, days after
switching her "second home" there. The
parliamentary authorities were concerned that the work
broke the "spirit" of the rules. However, the
MP's claim was not blocked. Miss Moran's expenses appear
to be among the most questionable of any MP. Over four
years she also spent thousands of pounds on three
separate properties, switching between Westminster, Luton
and Southampton and renovating each home in turn.
Phil Hope, the
Care Services Minister, has spent more than £37,000 on
refurbishing and furnishing a modest two-bedroom flat in
south London.
Ben Bradshaw, the
Health Minister, switched the designation of his second
home to a property he shares with his partner in west
London. Although the couple initially split the mortgage
costs, Mr Bradshaw now claims the entire interest bill on
the property, despite owning only half the property.
Phil Woolas, the
Home Office Minister, claimed for items of women's
clothing, tampons and nappies. The parliamentary rules
only allow expenses which are "exclusively" for
MPs' own use so it is not clear these items were
justified.
Greg Barker, the
shadow climate change minister, made £320,000 after
buying a flat with the help of taxpayers' money, and
selling it after only 27 months. He is the first senior
Tory to become embroiled in the expenses row, but details
of other prominent Conservatives will be disclosed in
coming days.
Barry Gardiner,
the former environment minister, made a profit of almost
£200,000 after buying a Westminster flat and claiming
thousands of pounds to renovate the property. Mr
Gardiner's main home is only eight miles from Parliament.
Also ...
Douglas Alexander:
spent more than £30,000 doing up his constituency home,
which then suffered damage in a house fire.
Margaret Beckett: £600 claim for hanging
baskets and pot plants.
Gordon Brown: house swap let him claim
thousands.
Andy Burnham: had an eight-month battle with
the fees office after making a single expenses claim for
more than £16,500.
Alistair Darling: stamp duty paid by public.
Caroline Flint: claimed £14,000 for fees
for new flat.
Geoff Hoon: established a property empire
worth £1.7 million after claiming taxpayer-funded
expenses for at least two properties.
Lord Mandelson: questions over timing of his
house claim.
David Miliband: spending challenged by his
gardener.
Shaun Woodward: millionaire minister
received £100,000 to help pay mortgage. (Source: Daily Telegraph, May/09)
Next >>>
|
|
|