WHERE'S
JFK?
The excuse given for renaming East
Midlands Airport is that it will be easier for
potential "tourists" to locate. If they
need such help, and I doubt it, maybe they could
just ask their airline or travel agent for a
ticket to get them to Derby?
Surely, any airline or travel agent should know
that EMA is the required destination airport. If
not, then they shouldn't be working in the travel
business. If BMI Baby is so worried about airport
names, when will it be complaining to the United
States about O'Hare and JFK? Les
Bywaters |
WASTE OF MONEY
I am disgusted at the airport's new
name. I lived in Castle Donington when it opened
on April 1, 1965. Before then, it was based at
Burnaston, near Derby. It belonged to all three
councils when it opened, so why does Nottingham
get priority?
If asked where Castle Donington is, with
racetrack, rock concert, etc, many people abroad
have heard of it. The airport gets a lot of
passenger trade from them. It will cost thousands
of pounds to change paperwork, signs, etc, and in
my opinion the money could be used to benefit the
airport much better. Mrs J. Lee |
|
|
EMA NAME CHANGE - Public
Opinion
So now it seems that Nottingham has gained a
new airport at Derby's and Leicester's expense, or did
Nottingham provide this airport in the first place? I
think not. I would have thought that East Midlands
Airport was well considered at the beginning to suit
three cities and counties, so why the sudden decision to
change? So now, if I want to fly in to Derby I have to
fly to Nottingham Airport, in Leicestershire. No
confusion there then. It appears that BMI are prepared to
alter distances and opinion polls just to suit their own
needs. Well, in a poll I carried out, 100% of the people
I surveyed wanted the airport to remain EMA.
It seems that Nottingham will do anything to put itself
on the map, regardless of others. Well done, Nottingham,
you are now on the map as the world's most treacherous
backstabbers. You've obviously got what you want, to the
cost of snubbing your neighbours' feelings. And as for
renaming the airport because of some fictitious cartoon
character, who came from Yorkshire anyway, do we really
need that? This whole idea sounds to me like it's being
done for someone's own meglomaniacal selfish gain. David
P. Murphy
So people won't fly to an airport unless it
has a name they recognise? To get to Derby, Leicester or
Nottingham they will fly to Birmingham or Luton, or
better still, London Luton, because they've heard of
these places. What preposterous nonsense. Surely, people
know where they want to get to and fly to the nearest
airport. You don't get to Menorca by flying to Palma
because you've never heard of Mahon. Would it not have
been better to call it New York, because more people will
have heard of that than Nottingham? Did those people
who'd never heard of East Midlands, but had heard of
Nottingham, know where it is? Did they know anything
about it? Would they want to go there if they did?
And, since their knowledge of geography is apparently
based on films, are they sure that that Robin
Whatshisname fellow wasn't from Notting Hill? This is a
bad and insulting decision made by "business"
people who are profit-and-spin-driven rather than
service-driven. If East Midlands Airport wants to
maintain or increase its business it should strive to be
the best airport around, not alienate two-thirds of its
existing domestic customer base by insulting them. I
would like to see the Derby and Leicester media mount a
sustained joint campaign to have this naive and stupid
decision reversed. If they had any sense of fair play and
consideration for their neighbours, the people of
Nottingham should also be objecting. Alan
MacMaster
With the renaming of East Midlands Airport
to Nottingham EMA, I feel the time has come for me to
vent my frustrations about Derby. Is Derby forever going
to have that small market town feel or will it finally
shake the shackles off and become a bustling, regional,
exciting, vibrant, forward-thinking city. It is time the
city council took a leaf from the books of Manchester and
Sheffield and, dare I say, Nottingham, and reinvent this
city of ours. Look at the comparable local cities of
Nottingham and Leicester. There is a 'city feeling' to
both of them. Both have a city skyline, which Derby
seriously lacks, apart from our Cathedral (I remember as
a child first driving into Nottingham and thinking that
that must be how Chicago looks!). Both promote themselves
in their own way. Leicester is a thriving multicultural
city, has a comedy festival, promotes new bands and
brands itself has an exciting place to live.
Nottingham is fast becoming the East Midlands capital,
promoting itself as a young, fashionable, cosmopolitan
and contemporary place to live. And what of Derby? No
office blocks to make a skyline, a shopping centre which
is not as big as those in Burton or Mansfield. No stylish
city centre apartments. No venue to hold big concerts ...
need I say more? So, come on Derby, let's make our city a
place to be proud of, let's get investment into it, let's
rebuild it, let's get people working and living here.
Let's get people wanting to visit Derby to shop and to be
entertained. Let's face it, how many of us visited
Nottingham over Christmas? Then ask yourself how many
Nottingham people came over to Derby? Enough of 'Derby -
the city where you can say yes' and more of 'Derby - the
city'. P. D. Johnson
|