BUDGET SHORTFALL
Derby City Council is facing a budget
shortfall of £2.3m in 2006, and it could rise to
as much as £4.5m. The new Labour administration
put the deficit down to mismanagement by the
previous Conservative and Lib Dem alliance.
Conservative leader Richard Smalley said,
"We left them in an excellent position. We
are proud of our record and while in power I will
accept no criticism of it. We achieved the lowest
council tax rise in eight years and how we can be
criticised for that I fail to understand."
(Source: BBC News) |
COUNCIL
COMPLAINTS
Complaints about Derby City Council shot up by
50% in 2002, with 69 registered complaints. The
figures, from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2003,
have been revealed in a letter from Patricia
Thomas, Local Government Ombudsman, to the
council. In 2001/02 there were 46 complaints and
in 2000/01 there were 44 complaints about the
city council.
The Local Government Ombudsman investigates
complaints of injustice by local authorities. It
investigate complaints about most council matters
including housing, planning, education, social
services and council tax.
The largest number of complaints were about
planning, with 15 lodged. The biggest increase
was on the subject of housing and housing
benefit. No complaint was subject to a formal
ombudsman report and seven were resolved locally. |
FUNDING
CHANGE
Under a planned government shake-up in
funding for local authorities, councils are to be
given new powers to impose taxes on hotel beds
and to bring in a local sales tax. (Source: News
of the World, Jan/06) |
DOG
MESS
The city council is spending almost
£40,000 to clean up dog mess. An extra 57 bins
will be provided and nearly 100 will be replaced.
Stickers will be placed on all bins reminding
owners to clear up after their pets.
Anyone who sees somebody not clearing up their
pet's mess is asked to ring a hotline to report
the time, date and location, as well as a
description of the owner and dog. Offenders face
an on-the-spot fine of £50 and in cases where
owners ignore the warnings they could face
prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000. |
|
|
DERBY CITY COUNCIL
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
Derby City Council signed a petition calling
on the authority to cut its carbon emissions by a quarter
within five years. The Derby Campaign against Climate
Change started the petition to coincide with the premiere
screening of an environmental film. Councillor Chris
Williamson attended the show and said he was so shocked
that he felt he had no option but to sign up. He has
instructed council officers to look at how cuts could be
achieved.
He said he hoped the council could significantly reduce
its carbon emissions by taking simple steps like using
energy-efficient light bulbs and switching lights off
where not needed, and swap council vehicles for more
energy-efficient alternatives. It will be interesting to
see if anybody attending a council or committee meeting
at the Council House will be travelling there by car or
by bus. (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Nov/06)
Derby City Council plans to increase car
park charges and close public toilets and tennis courts
in a bid to control its council tax. The costs of tickets
and hiring at the city's Assembly Rooms is also being
increased in a bid to limit the tax rise to below the
rate of inflation. Council leader Chris Williamson said
the proposals are reasonable and part of good
housekeeping by the city and added, "We have tried
to identify those areas of the council's activities that
people are not utilising. It would seem silly to keep
those facilities open." Funding for the annual
summer concerts in Derby's Market Place is also set to be
cut from £11,500 to £3,500, as part of the city
council's draft proposals for its 2006-7 budget. (Source:
BBC News, Jan/06)
People with overgrown hedges face bills of
up to £2,000 for trimming them down to size. Under
"nuisance neighbour" laws, local councils must
reduce the size of the hedges, but they can only trim a
third at a time in case the plant dies. The result, said
Baroness Gardner of Parkes, is three separate bills of up
to £650 each instead of a one-off fee. Lord Bassam, for
the government, said the law was "working".
The rules on hedges, part of the 2003 Anti-Social
Behaviour Act, which came into effect in 2005, allow
councils to intervene in disputes over high hedges which
block out light. But they cannot "remove", or
kill, the hedge, or cut it to below two metres in height.
Baroness Gardner said there was no part of the act which
allowed councils to charge an overall amount before
reducing it "in stages", rather than charging
separately each time it was trimmed.
She added, "Councils are naturally frightened that
they will be liable if a hedge dies, because they have
been told that if it dies that is the same as removing
it." Lord Bassam said it was best to reduce the
height "in phases, according to the growing
season". It was also "up to the local
authority" to set its own fees. He added that the
government had an "armed snatch squad of inspectors
touring up and down the country" looking for
Leylandii Cypress, some of the fastest-growing hedges.
(Source: BBC News)
Derby City Council was left red-faced after
personal information about 34 pupils with attendance and
behavioural problems appeared on it's website. A document
for a meeting of the School Admissions Forum was also
circulated by post and contained a full list of all the
pupils who have taken part in the city council's managed
moves scheme in the last 12 months. The scheme involves
the transfer of pupils in danger of exclusion from their
existing school to another which might help to sort out
their problems.
The council may now be forced to answer for its actions
at an official level after parents said they would be
taking the matter to the Information Commissioner's
Office, which oversees the implementation of the Data
Protection Act. The list gave the full name of the pupil,
both schools involved, parental response to the transfer
and the number of fixed exclusion days and the attendance
rate for each child following their transfers.
There was also a column detailing whether or not parents
had been fined if their child had skipped school. One
parents with children on the list said she intended to
ask how such a mistake could have happened and said,
"I know my son is no angel, but I don't like the
idea of his details being available for everyone to
see." Another said she was horrified that people
could read that a fixed penalty notice had been issued to
her family.
A council spokesman said, "We withdrew the item from
the website immediately we became aware of the situation
and are endeavouring to recall the documents which have
been sent out. The list was mistakenly included and
shouldn't have been made public. We deeply regret
this." A spokeswoman for the ICO said that if anyone
made an official complaint about the situation it would
be investigated to see if there had been a breach of the
Data Protection Act. (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph)
The City Council is to use a debt collection
agency in order to recover overdue library books. The
agency will target people ignoring reminder letters
asking them to return reading material and other items.
The new policy is being introduced to try and recover
more than £30,000 worth of books, CDs and DVDs which go
missing each year. The council also wants to recover
unpaid library fines and will negotiate a payment plan
with people with financial difficulties.
Councillor Hardyal Dhindsa said it may be tough but it is
a necessary course of action to stop people keeping
books. He said, "Even with the system in place we
will notify offenders with two letters requesting them to
return the books and work out some financial arrangements
for repaying the debt. If that fails I think it is a duty
on us as managing tax-payers funds that we retrieve money
which is owed."
Borrowers who have ignored reminder letters about overdue
books, and other items, could end up with bailiffs
knocking at the door, and even find themselves in court.
The council, which is responsible for 12 libraries,
estimates that it loses £50,000 every year due to people
not returning items or not paying their fines.
A spokesman for the council said, "We want to get
all these things back so that other people can borrow
them and we want the people who have overdue items to be
able to use the library again. We expect to get back
thousands of pounds a year in fines and materials that
would otherwise be lost to our libraries." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph)
The city council is to review a social
services contract which in October 2003, council leader
Chris Williamson described as an "astonishing"
waste of council tax payers' money. The two-year
contract, with care firm Vitalise, provides holidays for
severely disabled people in the city. The deal, which was
signed by the previous Lib Dem/Tory council, will cost
£781,000 in the first year.
Labour claimed the new contract was five times more
expensive for day care and twice as expensive for short
breaks than the old contract. Mr Williamson said,
"I've asked my cabinet members to review all areas
of expenditure. Clearly this is one of those which will
be looked at very closely." He added that
contractural obligations had to be considered, which
probably means we're stuck with it.
|
|
|