| |
|
US COP QUITS UK FORCE
A Texan patrol officer who became the first
foreigner to join the British police is to resign after
three years because he says policing is too dangerous
here compared with America. Ben Johnson, a 6ft 4in former
paratrooper nicknamed Slim, has written to his chief
constable asking to carry a Glock 17 handgun on his
routine beat in Reading. He said officers are dying
unnecessarily because they are less well equipped and
trained to protect themselves and the public than their
American counterparts.
The risks required to be taken by unarmed and
poorly trained British police are too great for me to
continue being a police officer and I will be resigning
my commission in a few weeks, said Johnson. I
am tired of my colleagues dying when, if they were better
trained and equipped, they would have a fighting chance
of survival. Johnsons decision was prompted
by the murder of PC Sharon Beshenivsky, a mother of three
children and two step-children, who was shot during a
robbery in Bradford. He said her death demonstrated the
lack of training and equipment given to British police.
He said, Beshenivsky did the one thing that
officers in America are trained not to do. She walked up
to the front entrance of a business during an alarm call.
If the incident had happened in America, she would never
have done that. She would almost certainly have been
alive today. Johnson wrote to Sara Thornton, acting
chief constable of Thames Valley police, asking to be
armed on patrol. If the chief authorises me to
carry a pistol, then I will not be resigning, he
said. But that is an impossibility. I now have the
choice of continuing in a dangerous job, ill-trained and
ill-equipped, or leaving the profession I have
loved.
Johnson served as a paratrooper in the American army
before joining the police department in Garland, a Dallas
suburb. Like other officers he carried a Glock 22 pistol
as a sidearm, supported by a 12-bore shotgun and an AR15
semi-automatic rifle in his patrol car. In America he
routinely confronted armed criminals and received 10
commendations for his bravery. He came to Britain three
years ago to live with his fiancée Louise, an IT
consultant. He was able to join the Thames Valley force
because of a change in regulations that lifted the bar on
foreigners.
He said, It seems that in Britain ordinary officers
are instructed not to engage with dangerous criminals.
But if police officers cant engage with them, who
can? He is critical of Charles Clarke, the home
secretary, who says he can see no evidence
that arming officers would reduce the number of police
fatalities. With all respect to the home secretary,
he has never answered a 999 call, said Johnson.
Of Beshenivskys murder, he said, I have been
in exactly those situations on patrol in America and I
have managed to arrest and disarm offenders without being
harmed. In America, officers spend weeks learning
how to cope with armed incidents. But in Britain, Johnson
said, he was never shown how to handle or unload a
firearm or told how to respond to an armed robbery.
Officers spend more time learning about how to
process paperwork than dealing with violent situations.
We are trained more like social workers than police
officers."
He added, The training I received in Britain in
dealing with armed incidents was virtually non-existent.
It consisted of a 30-minute lecture from a firearms
officer who said, If you see the business end of a
gun or anyone holding a gun ... turn, run and get away as
quickly as possible. This apparent
complacency was reinforced at his swearing-in ceremony
when a senior Thames Valley officer told him and
colleagues that they would not face the sort of dangerous
incidents portrayed on The Bill, the television
programme.
I was surprised that he said we wouldnt come
into harms way. This went against everything I had
learnt during my career, said Johnson. The chief
officer of Garland police department tells new recruits
that it is his task to ensure they are prepared and
equipped to face any threat. But he maintained that
British police are far more exposed to danger when
confronted with armed offenders than their US
counterparts. (Source: Times Online)
|
|
|