TOLD
TO PAY
The Friends of Elvaston Castle have been told
they may have to pay if they want any more
information about the building. They have been
using the Freedom of Information Act to find out
how much Derbyshire County Council has spent on
the buildings and land but now members have been
told many of their questions relate to
environmental issues, which come under the
Environmental Information Regulations 2004, not
the FOI Act.
In a letter to Friends' member Graham Mansey,
assistant county council secretary Kay Riley,
said all information provided under the
regulations could be charged for. She wrote,
"If some of your requests come within the
EIR provisions the council is entitled to charge
you for all information provided in response to
those requests."
However, the Department for Environment Food and
Rural Affairs' website showed that a charge would
be made only if the cost of retrieving the
information under the EIR was more than £450,
the same as FOI requests.
The letter from the council came after the
Friends asked how much money had been spent on
the advertising, marketing and sale of Elvaston
Castle Country Park, including all public
consultations, since 1999.
Some of this information has now been received
and it has been revealed that in the financial
year 2005-6, the council spent more than £85,000
on consultants' fees and public consultations
relating to the castle and historic gardens. In
the financial year 2006-7 that figure was almost
£15,500.
Members of the Friends have accused the council
of trying to hide information. A spokesman for
the group said, "The fact that the council
is threatening to levy charges on any future
request by the friends would seem to indicate
that they have things to hide."
He added, "The council was recently guilty
of breaking Section 10 of the FOI Act because
they did not reply to our request for information
within 20 working days. It actually took almost
40 days and we have since complained to the FOI
commissioner, which is still ongoing."
(Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Feb/08) |
|
|
ELVASTON CASTLE - FINAL CONSULTATION
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
The Friends of Elvaston Castle are upset
that two trees have been cut down in the grounds. They
claim that the two ash trees, which were thought to be at
least 150 years old, were probably healthy and should not
have been felled. They were not in leaf when they were
felled and the council said that was one of the reasons
it had determined that they had died and needed to be cut
down. Graham Mansey, secretary of the group, said members
were concerned that more healthy trees could face the
axe, although there has been no suggestion that the
council is considering further work along those lines.
He said, "While we do not question works which are
necessary to guarantee the safety of park much more
thorough methods of diagnosis used when condemning mature
and veteran trees. In the case of the trees that were
felled, the council had previously had contractors
clearing out the ditch where they stood. We suspect that
the digger may have damaged the roots. Oddly, areas of
the park which could do with thinning out or clearing
seem to be neglected."
The Friends called in an independent arboriculturist to
examine the remains of the felled ash trees. They hoped
he would be able to determine whether or not they were
dead or diseased, as claimed by the council. Mr Mansey
said the arboriculturist told him that because the trees
had been felled, it was difficult to say if they were
diseased but he reported that the stumps looked healthy.
And he added that even if the trees were dead they could
still have provided a habitat for wildlife if they had
not been felled.
A report by the specialist, for the Friends, said the
trees could have lost their leaves because of disease but
may not actually have been dead. It said, "Another
cause could be that the roots had suffered disturbance
and the trees were just taking their time to recover. The
heartwood in the stumps looks healthy and there is no
sign of rot whatsoever. Judging by the condition of what
remains, these particular trees may have stood for many
years and provided mini eco-systems for insects for the
birds and bats which feed off them." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Dec/06)
Derbyshire County Council submitted a £10m
bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund last summer, to restore
Elvaston Castle gardens. The Friends of Elvaston Castle
have discovered the bid was withdrawn in November, a
decision the council failed to publicise. The Heritage
Lottery Fund had asked the council for more details of
its proposals for the gardens, but because the council
was not willing to foot the bill to provide in-depth
details, it withdrew its bid.
The council voted to give Highgate Sanctuary a 150-year
lease, despite public protest, including a petition
signed by 61,500 people, and concerns raised during
public consultation. The lease, which has not yet been
signed, states that Highgate Sanctuary would provide
£2.75m match funding needed for a bid to the Heritage
Lottery Fund for the restoration of the gardens. It also
says that Highgate would relieve the council of the cost
of repairing the house.
Graham Mansey, Secretary of Friends of Elvaston Castle,
said he was extremely concerned about the future of the
historic gardens under the present plans now that the
lottery bid had been withdrawn. He said, "The
council was supposed to make information about the bid
public by February at the latest but did not do so,
prompting the Friends of Elvaston to contact the Heritage
Lottery Fund. We would like to see the house, gardens and
estate completely restored."
He added, "The Heritage Lottery Fund has informed
the Friends that money is available for restoration,
including the house, but that this money must benefit as
wide a proportion of the community as possible and must
not lead to loss of public access. We opposed the
council's application and expressed this to the Heritage
Lottery Fund. We do not agree with the public loss of
Elvaston Castle. Surely this should be an opportune
moment for the community to call time on the disposal of
Elvaston Castle."
A county council spokeswoman said that re-submitting the
lottery bid had not been ruled out but was unable to give
any time frame. She said, "The council is still
seeking the full restoration of the gardens. We withdrew
the application after the Heritage Lottery Fund asked for
more details of our proposals, which would have committed
us to significant extra costs at a very early stage. We
are continuing to work to obtain a sustainable future for
the castle and grounds." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph, Mar/07)
As reported in the Derby Evening Telegraph
(Saturday, March 9, 2007), Derbyshire County Council
(DCC) has withdrawn its £10 million grant bid from the
Heritage Lottery Fund. The County Council had pledged to
announce the result of its bid for funding in January,
or, at the latest, February. This deadline came and went
and so the Friends of Elvaston contacted the Heritage
Lottery Fund (HLF), to find out exactly where the matter
stood. To our astonishment, we discovered that the DCC
had withdrawn its application back in NOVEMBER! So, for
three months, the Council had withheld from the entire
community, the results of a matter which is very high on
the register of public interest.
The reason which the DCC has given for its withdrawal is
curious and deserves further scrutiny. According to the
County Council, the HLF asked it for further details of
its proposals for the Gardens which the authority claimed
would cause it to incur significant costs. This, it
stated, it is unwilling to do at what the authority
describes as an early stage in the possible
development of Elvaston Castle and grounds, so it
withdrew its bid. The developer is quoted as supporting
the Councils bid withdrawal, claiming that it is
going to be improved for resubmission. The Council has
not ruled out resubmission but is unable to give a time
frame.
The Friends of Elvaston would like to make it clear that
we cannot support any action which takes away public
ownership, and, access to, such an important place as
Elvaston Castle Country Park. We submitted a 17 page
dossier to the HLF last October, outlining our concerns
about various aspects of the disposal plan and how it
could affect the community. We have concluded that the
HLF too, shares our concerns. We are particularly worried
about the major road down the South Drive, which will be
dangerous to families with toddlers, individuals and pets
alike. The developer plans to run the road straight
through the Golden Gates and the restored Gardens.
This is a retrograde step as far as we are concerned and
the resultant pollution from exhausts, artificial
lighting and road drainage, threat to wildlife and public
safety, not to mention the destruction of the beauty of
the southern approach, must not happen. Further to this
we dispute what the County Council states about
early days as far as the possible development
of Elvaston Castle and grounds is concerned. The DCC has
being attempting to off-load the Estate since 1999, eight
years! It is a matter of record that the DCC submitted a
grant application to the HLF for funding to restore the
internationally important gardens at Elvaston Castle
Country Park in 2000.
The HLF requested that the Council withdraw the bid and
develop it further, by adding a conservation plan for the
Gardens and an holistic management plan which encompassed
the whole Estate. Hilary Taylor and her Associates were
engaged to carry out the work and this went ahead at a
cost of £35,000, £21,400 of which was supplied by the
HLF and the remainder by Derbyshire taxpayers. Although
the plans were completed the DCC did not submit a further
bid (which HLF had encouraged it to do following
completion of the work), until last year. We now know
that the outcome has once again been unsuccessful.
However, the DCC can hardly claim with any credibility
that this is an early stage in the development, or that
it was unaware of the costs and protocols involved with a
resubmitted bid to the HLF. When the Lanarca garden
survey was being carried out for the DCC in 2005 (cost,
£25,000), in the question and answer section of its
website, one question featured asked what would happen if
the DCC bid for HLF money was unsuccessful. The answer
stated that the DCC had identified a significant sum of
matched funding and that the development partner proposes
a large cash contribution. Apart from emphasising the
fact that in this event any restoration would be
piecemeal, it also begs other questions.
Why, if the DCC has a significant sum of money, has some
of this not been spent on restoring the Castle and Estate
in general and retaining it in public ownership?
Secondly, if such a sum is available, why did the Council
not feel able to provide the funding needed to supply
further information to the HLF? In the article, two
lovely little sisters from Darley Abbey, aged two and
six, are pictured enjoying a walk in Elvaston Castle. It
is interesting that although both Darley and Markeaton
Parks are on their doorstep in that part of the City,
their parents chose to bring them to Elvaston Park. Is it
the vast amount of space? The surroundings? The Castle
and the buildings? All we know is that it is a very much
loved public open space which is cherished by many people
and we must guard its future. Graham Mansey,
Secretary, Friends of Elvaston
<<< Prev
|
|
|