UNDER THREAT
Is our heritage under threat, or is it a
question of management strategy over the future
of Elvaston Castle country park? A look at all
views need to be thoughtfully considered to get a
consensus of ideas and opinions. We must not
squander this opportunity with short-term
objectives.
The county council must be reminded of the
long-term objectives in preserving what is
rightfully ours and help them to explore all
possibilities towards an action plan for full
restoration, so let's ask a more positive
question: What's to be done with this first
country park?
All appropriate organisations need to be
contacted to offer the expertise and advice in
helping us to preserve our unique heritage. More
open-air music events are needed, including pop,
classical, traditional and folk. There could also
be plays, theatre, schools involved in singing,
etc.
We could also hold historical re-enactments,
funfairs and various creative arts. Why not
restore the working farm, with animals and
produce of all kinds? Let's regenerate a wider
interest in botanical and horticultural events
such as nature issues, growing plants, trees,
etc. David Morley |
|
|
ELVASTON CASTLE
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
Campaigners fighting plans
to turn Elvaston Castle into a luxury hotel have produced
a map to show where they fear a golf
course planned for its park will be built. Tanya
Spilsbury, managing director of Highgate Sanctuary, has
refused to reveal where the golf course will be but that
it could include part of a 35-acre nature reserve on the
estate, which is open to the public. The reserve has not
been included in the 185-acre section of the 325-acre
site labelled "historic core gardens", which
Derbyshire County Council and Highgate Sanctuary plan to
restore and keep open to the public as part of a £10m
Heritage Lottery Fund bid.
Under the terms of the lease and lottery funding, public
access to the historic core gardens, as well as other
parts of the estate including the lake and woodland, is
protected. The cricket ground and the showground would
also remain as they are. The rest of the land is either
private or will be used for the golf course and new
buildings. Golf courses vary in size. In Derbyshire they
range from the 18-hole Mickleover golf course, in
Uttoxeter Road, which is 98 acres, to Morley Hayes, in
Main Road, Morley, which covers an area of 270 acres for
an 18-hole and nine-hole course.
The Friends of Elvaston action group has combined local
knowledge, studies of the land and information leaked to
it from the county council to come up with its own
design. It hopes that by highlighting the possibilities,
Mrs Spilsbury would provide the public with her plans.
Secretary Graham Mansey said, "We feel it's
important for people to realise how much will be lost to
the public. The area that we have marked for the
clubhouse, driving range and car park is known as Clover
Close. We believe that they will wish to bring a road
down London Road Drive."
He added, "They can overcome the problem of the
listed lodge gates by creating a new entrance nearby, the
road will adjoin the existing road at the Golden Gates
and turn left to the hotel. The reason that we believe
they will want to locate the main buildings here is that
it's the closest area which links with the village drain
and sewage systems." Clive Ibbotson, secretary of
the Derbyshire Union of Golf Clubs, added, "We
welcome new golf courses in the county because it will
hopefully increase the number of people who will play the
game." (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph)
Councillor Bob Janes
states, "Elvaston Castle and Country Park is not for
sale." What Councillor Janes does not inform us is
that the 99-year lease for the park and castle is for
sale. After 99 years' ownership reverts to the people.
This is a subtle play on words as the end result is
exactly the same, loss of access to the castle and park.
Property consultants FPD Savills issued a glossy brochure
on behalf of Derbyshire County Council stating that the
sale is Long Leasehold/Freehold. Under Aims and
Objectives, it states, "Continued provision for
public access as far as possible." This contradicts
Councillor Janes' claims that "public access is not
and never has been under threat."
He also says, "There will be no entry fee to walk in
the park." There are public rights-of-way through
the park, set in law, which cannot be taken away. So
there is another play on words. Are we to be allowed to
walk through but not in the parkland? Let us now
establish where and what, exactly, the park is. Is it
where we now walk and enjoy the area within the estate?
I'm afraid not!
The wild-flower meadow is not part of the park. The
fields where the horses graze are not part of the park.
The fields and woods from the Golden Gates to the
entrance at the A6 are not part of the park. The entire
area, including that on the north side, adjacent to the
lake, across to the Golden Gates, in the opposite
direction from the former working farm museum, to the Old
English Garden, is not parkland. This entire area is
classed as the gardens.
So what, exactly, is the park, Councillor Janes? When the
Derbyshire County Council's preferred bidder was
announced as Highgate Sanctuary, the director of the
company, Tanya Spilsbury, was interviewed on Radio Derby.
She revealed that there would be loss of public access to
the parkland. To create a top-class hotel in the castle
building would totally destroy the internal fabric of
this Grade II-listed historic house.
It does not surprise me that the leaseholder/freeholder
would support a lottery funding bid to restore the
gardens, as their hotel will be sitting in the middle of
them, to be enjoyed by their exclusive clientele. To
transform the stables into a craft centre and café would
be criminal, ending all hope of reinstating horse riding
facilities for disabled children and people with learning
difficulties.
The destruction of the wild-flower meadow by the building
of an 18-hole golf course would also remove a wildlife
haven. Is yet another golf course of any real benefit to
the community, or the environment? Why is Bob Janes
giving out misinformation on this issue? The Elvaston
Estate was bought jointly by the then Derby Borough
Council, and Derbyshire County Council.
The park, created under the Countryside Act 1968, became
the first country park in England. The scheme attracted a
government grant of 75%. The estate was jointly funded by
both councils until boundary changes, when it came under
the guardianship of Derbyshire County Council.
In 1969, Harry Crossley, then the clerk to the county
council, made the following statement, "Country
parks are not designed solely to serve the locality in
which they are situated and Elvaston will be of regional,
indeed national, significance." Let Derbyshire
County and Derby City Councils turn the castle over to a
trust, raised from the community.
It should have a business approach to generating an
income, but use those funds to restore and preserve the
estate. On behalf of all the people who use Elvaston
Castle and Country Park both now, and in the future, I
ask Derby City Council to grasp this opportunity offered
by Councillor Janes. Alexander Devlin
|
|
|