REQUESTS DISAPPEAR
By a convenient coincidence requests under the
Freedom of Information Act directed to Charles
Heaney, Project Manager, Derbyshire County
Council, have unaccountably disappeared into
cyberspace. These enquiries concerned possible
landscape restoration at Elvaston Country Park,
as part of a proposed bid for Heritage Lottery
Funding.
Regular readers of the Gripe will recollect an
earlier warning on what is euphemistically
referred to as 'landscape restoration'. A
telephone call to Mr Heaney revealed that his
e-mail address had been incorrectly supplied but
that it had taken eight months for this error to
be detected.
This has given Derbyshire County Council valuable
breathing space, the original request having been
submitted in March. FOI requests submitted to
Leeds City Council have also mysteriously
remained unanswered due to 'clerical or postal
error', until once again pursued by telephone.
I wonder how many local authorities up and down
the country are suffering similar glitches.
Enacting legislation is one thing, enforcing it
is quite another and evidence is emerging that
some officers are becoming increasingly creative
in an effort to thwart the spirit of the Act. Shirley
Cynical |
|
|
ELVASTON CASTLE
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
I am incensed that
Derbyshire County Council, despite public protest, is
still pursuing its project to sell off Elvaston Castle.
We see almost daily the carnage that is happening to the
castle and estate. I can well see why Highgate Sanctuary
is pursuing this long-term potential investment with
vigour. They have a vision of a lucrative long-term
venture. It is however to the detriment of the public
with greatly reduced free space. We see daily that
artefacts, once thought valuable enough to be preserved,
have been neglected and now are being placed in skips to
be destroyed. The working museum that used to house these
valuables was a treasure in itself and is a great
educational loss.
The Countryside Act of 1968 was passed by Parliament to
provide improved opportunities for the enjoyment of the
countryside by the public. Derbyshire should be proud
that The Peak District National Park and Elvaston Castle
Estate were all firsts nationwide. One of these is
seriously under threat. The historic gardens are nice to
have but not imperative. Where is the logic in spending
£10m on restoring them to their original 1830s
splendour, when an adjacent Grade Two-listed building is
in need of a relatively small amount to restore? It is a
sad reflection of our times, but when the gardens are
restored they will need a hefty budget for security
fencing and maintenance to retain the 1830s splendour,
recognising the estate employed 90 gardeners in 1867.
We know the cost deficit of expenditure over income to
run the estate is in excess of £500,000 and this must be
increasing due to the council's lack of commercial
utilisation. The recent County Show has moved away and
this surely would be a lucrative booking for the show
ground. The nature reserve looks like being lost forever,
so where are all these concerned ornithologists with
their objections to the council? It cannot be about
money. Costs incurred by the council from the start of
this saga in 1999 by agents, advisers, consultants and
lawyers must run into millions. We need the county
council to discharge its responsibility to an authorised
trust which will work with the council to run the estate
commercially, while retaining full public access. Roy
Battelle
Campaign groups who had
criticised the county council for its decision to offer a
99-year lease to a private developer, were at last told
that people would be asked what they wanted to see in the
gardens. But controversy continues to cast a shadow over
the site as some visitors claim that their involvement in
the plans for the gardens is not enough, they want the
chance to have their say on the entire scheme, which will
see the creation of a hotel and golf course. Consultant
Lanarca, based in Newark, is preparing the consultation
programme for the county council's application for up to
£10m from the Heritage Lottery Fund to restore the
"historic core gardens" at Elvaston Castle
"to their former glory". The company is aiming
to get as many people as possible to make the most of the
chance to give their views. As part of the public
consultation process, it has now sent a questionnaire to
every household in Elvaston. The company has also posted
forms, also available from the castle and the county
council, to more than 70 groups and organisations with an
interest in the future of the stately home and country
park.
Rachael McCormack, director of Lanarca, said,
"People's views are important in developing the
proposals for the gardens. There is already a high level
of interest in the gardens, because of the speculation
surrounding the future development plans for the castle
and the estate. However, this consultation process is not
about the project currently under development between the
council and Highgate Sanctuary Ltd. This consultation
will focus on the gardens." Alex Devlin, chairman of
the Friends of Elvaston, of Chaddesden, highlighted the
fact that in the consultation carried out by the council
in 2000, 78% of people did not agree "the estate
should be leased or sold to release substantial income to
be spent on key county council services". That
complaint is currently being investigated, with the
investigator expected to pass on the facts of the case to
the ombudsman. The Friends are also critical of a number
of elements of the latest consultation process.
Secretary Graham Mansey, of Spondon, said, "Once
again, the county council is failing to carry out a full
and open public consultation, as it is claiming. By not
asking people whether the gardens should be restored
before, for instance, the castle itself, we believe that
the public is being told what is to happen, not asked.
The only reason that this consultation is being carried
out by the county council is because of the Heritage
Lottery Fund rules. It is a shame that it did not carry
out such an extensive and prolonged public consultation
regarding its plans to dispose of the estate altogether.
How can the county council apply for the use of Heritage
Lottery Funding, which is public money to be used for the
benefit of the community, when the sole beneficiary will
be Highgate Sanctuary? The county council has to match
fund the bid for lottery funding, which will be £2.5m of
Derbyshire taxpayers' money - again, sole beneficiary,
Highgate Sanctuary."
The group pointed to particular elements of the
questionnaire, which it felt were inadequate for the task
involved and claimed it was "little more than a
public relations exercise". Mr Mansey added,
"If the county council's objective was to get a
clear impression of what the public wants from the estate
and not merely to fulfil a set of criteria for a £10m
bid for Heritage Lottery Funding, it would have been
better do so through the pages of the Derby Evening
Telegraph." A website has been set up for people to
have their say on the future of Elvaston Castle and
gardens and features information about the consultation
process, which will culminate in a bid for National
Lottery money to restore the historic core gardens. The
website has been set up by consultancy firm Lanarca,
which has been employed by the council. To have your say,
obtain a questionnaire by calling 0845 605 8058, ask for
one at Elvaston Castle or download one from: www.elvastoncastlegardens.co.uk
|
|
|