LEGALISED MUGGING
Barclays are to change the overdraft
buffer on current accounts from £25 to £5,
putting customers at increased risk of facing
charges for going overdrawn by a minimal amount.
Those who go into arrears by more than £5 will
face a fee of £25. Interest will be charged on
the overdrawn amount at an annual rate of 27.5%.
A spokeswoman for Barclays denied the decision to
reduce the overdraft buffer was about boosting
profits. Well she would wouldn't she? |
BIG
PROFITS
Barclays has seen annual pre-tax profits
climb to record levels boosted by a sharp rise in
business at its investment arm. Profits for the
year to 31 December 2004 rose 20% to £4.6bn.
Barclays' chief John Varley said the bank had
"caught the winds" of a very strong
world economy.
Earnings at Barclays Capital investment bank rose
25% to £1.04bn, but investment in branch
operations held back growth in its UK retail
business. The group is the first of Britain's
five big banks to report 2004 results. According
to analysts' forecasts, HSBC, the biggest UK bank
by stock market valuation, will report profits of
£9.4bn. |
|
|
BARCLAYCARD TOO EXPENSIVE
Barclays promised that free banking
is here to stay. The pledge came amid speculation many
banks are planning to reintroduce charges on current
accounts if watchdogs make them cut fees in other areas.
Barclays reported a 35% rise in full year pre-tax profits
to a record £7.14billion which was due mainly to a
strong performance at investment banking arm Barclays
Capital, with less than a fifth coming from providing
banking services to individual Britons.
John Varley, chief executive, said, "The UK is
pretty much unique in the developed world for offering
free banking, that works to the advantage of the
overwhelming majority of customers. Were committed
to delivering that to our customers because we think it
is something they value greatly. The cost of banking in
the UK, if you have a credit balance on your account or
an agreed overdraft, is very low. If you look at value
for money, the proposition offered by British banks is
very good."
Mr Varley said Britain was lucky in having such a
profitable banking sector and added, "It's good for
ths country to have a good self-confident banks like
Barclays, we employ about a million people here. As a
result of our success in 2006 we pay a lot of tax. Our
tax charge in 2006 will be about £2billion, think how
many hospitals and schools and roads you can build for
£2billion. Add in the tax paid on salaries and that
number is far bigger." (Source: The Sun, Feb/07)
The chief
executive of Barclays Bank admitted he does not use a
Barclaycard to borrow money because it is too expensive.
Appearing before the Treasury Select Committee, Matthew
Barrett was criticised for the fact that while interest
rates had fallen by more than two thirds since 1992 to
just 3.5%, interest charged on a Barclaycard had come
down from 24.6% to 17.9%. Asked by the chairman of the
committee John McFall, Labour MP for Dumbarton, what he
considered an excessive rate of interest, he replied,
"I think if I had to pay more than I can get
elsewhere in the market, I would consider going
elsewhere."
Committee member George Mudie, Labour member for Leeds
East, then asked if that meant Mr Barrett had a Cahoot
card in his wallet as they charged interest at just 8%.
Mr Barrett replied, "I don't borrow on credit cards
because it is too expensive." The committee, which
was investigating the transparency of credit card
charges, also heard evidence from the chief executives of
Lloyds TSB, Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and MBNA
European Bank. MPs welcomed the new Summary Boxes which
card issuers have agreed to introduce on adverts giving
details of all charges and interest rates.
Barclaycard defended the comments of the chief executive.
They issued a statement which said: "Matt Barrett's
comments were made in the context of a debate about
people facing long-term problems with debt. In the
context of people facing long-term debt, credit cards are
not the answer. Most people recognise that credit cards
are not the cheapest way to borrow money in the long-term
- they are a short-term borrowing tool offering complete
flexibility and convenience."
Barclaycard has been
accused by the Consumers' Association of misleading
customers over a credit card offer. The group says the
offer fails to make clear that the 0% interest on balance
transfers is only available if the card is used to make
purchases. The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) told
Barclaycard to scrap a previous advert for the offer on
the grounds it was "highly misleading."
Barclaycard said the new adverts had been drawn up with
the help of the OFT.
The Consumers' Association has written to the Advertising
Standards Authority (ASA) urging it to take action
against Barclaycard. The deal offers people a 0% interest
rate on balance transfers until they have paid them off
so long as they spend at least £50 a month on the card.
The new debt is charged at a typical interest rate of
14.9%. If the card holder fails to spend at least £50 a
month on the new card, interest at 6.9% is charged on the
sum of the balance transfer.
Barclays chief executive Matt Barrett was criticised by
the parliamentary Treasury Select Committee for its 0%
credit card offer. One member of the committee went as
far as describing the marketing tactics employed in
attracting new card business as "a bait and a
trap". Ashleye Sharpe of the Consumers' Association
said that the new revamped 'Just the facts' advert still
failed to alert customers to interest charges. "We
are very disappointed to find that Barclaycard is still
misleading consumers about the true cost of this
deal,"
Ms Sharpe said, "This kind of marketing is corporate
cynicism at its worst." In response, Barclaycard
attacked the Consumers' Association for not having done
its homework. "The Consumers' Association seems to
be the only organisation that thinks this advert is
misleading," Ian Barber, Barclaycard spokesman said.
"We went through the advert with the OFT and the
brochure mentions, no less than 10 times, that customers
need to spend £50 a month to obtain the 0% balance
transfer rate," Mr Barber added.
For over
two decades, the Narmada Valley in central India has been
the site of one of the country's most famous civil
disobedience movements. Small farmers, tribal groups and
fisherpeople refused to vacate their land for a series of
30 large dams, that would flood one of India's most
productive agricultural regions and lead to the forcible
displacement of an estimated 2 million people.
The Trans-Thai-Malaysia Project in southern Thailand has
been overwhelmingly opposed since its inception by local
people, who believe that the project will pollute the
marine and local environments and rip apart the society
in affected fishing villages.
Since 2000, the government has resorted to violence,
intimidation, harassment, arrests, legal fraud, illegal
detentions and threats of force to try to push the
project through. Defying this violence, local opponents
have peacefully occupied land near the gas separation
plant construction site for nearly two years. Despite
this massive community opposition, the human rights issue
and the environmental impacts, Barclays Bank is financing
both projects. (Source: Corporatewatch)
Barclays chief executive
Matt Barrett, who told MPs he didn't use Barclays credit
cards because the interest rate was too high, saw his pay
package increase to £3.8million. The 59-year-old
Canadian received £1.1million pay, a £1.9million bonus
and £831,000 in share options. Another £990,000 was
paid into Barrett's pension fund, as profits at the bank
rose 20% to £3.8billion in 2003.
Eddy Weatherill, chairman of the Independent Banking
Advisory Group, said, "This is a massive slap in the
face for consumers. People are getting pig sick of this
kind of greed. It's like sticking two fingers up to
customers." Barclays said, "The reason Matt's
pay is up so much is that we had an exceptional
year." Well yes, you could say £3.8billion is
pretty good!
|
|
|