UK TO BLAME
According to Amnesty International, a failed
asylum-seeker has been 'unfairly sentenced' to 12
years' jail in Syria after being forcibly
returned from the UK. Muhammad Osama Sayes was
jailed after he was convicted of belonging to the
banned Muslim Brotherhood. Amnesty said Sayes was
tried by the 'notoriously unfair' Supreme State
Security Court, whose trials fall short of
international standards.
Amnesty's UK campaigns director, Tim Hancock,
said, "It's appalling that this man has been
jailed for 12 years just for expressing his
political beliefs. This is a glaring example of
what happens when countries like the UK fail to
offer protection to asylum-seekers. Incommunicado
detention, unfair trials, draconian jail
sentences and a real risk of torture." So
the UK is to blame because we didn't accept him
being a member of a banned organisation. (Source:
Observer, Jul/06) |
|
|
ANOTHER CRACKDOWN ON ASYLUM SEEKERS
2
Tony Blair
predicted that the number of migrants heading to Britain
would drop as a result of the Government's overhaul of
the immigration and asylum system. Mr Blair was
challenged over whether the Government's five-year asylum
and immigration plan would lead to a rise or fall in net
immigration. He said, "The numbers probably will
fall because those people who are coming in, abusing the
system or who aren't covered by the restrictions, won't
be able to settle here." The Prime Minister's
forecast contradicted the Home Secretary, Charles Clarke,
who said that the proposals were unlikely greatly to
affect overall migrant numbers.
Under the plans, only highly skilled workers who speak
English and pass a "Britishness test" will be
allowed to settle permanently in the UK. Low-skilled
migrants will be permitted to enter for fixed periods but
receive no right to settle. Mr Blair ridiculed Tory
proposals, which include an annual cap on immigrants and
offshore processing. But Mr Howard produced a letter from
the Prime Minister to the President of the European
Council in 2003 offering to discuss the idea of sending
people seeking asylum in EU countries to a "transit
processing centre" outside the European nations.
The Tories returned to the impact of the expansion of the
European Union on 1 May 2004. New figures showed that
1,029,000 people from the eight new eastern European
members visited Britain in the first eight months after
accession with approximately 92,000 saying they were
intending to stay for more than three months. That
compared with an initial government prediction that
expansion of the EU could lead to net migration of up to
13,000. Migrationwatch UK said that there had been a
major trend of white families moving out of London to the
regions, while large numbers of ethnic minorities arrived
in the capital from overseas. (Source: The
Independent)
Thousands of
asylum seekers, who pocketed Government bribes to quit
Britain are heading back to the UK, to claim a second
helping. In 2006 alone, more than 6,000 foreigners were
handed up to £3,000 each plus a plane ticket to leave
but under Home Office rules, there is nothing to stop
them returning to ask for asylum again in the hope of
grabbing another bundle of taxpayers' cash. The
"free money" scandal costs Brits more than
£40million a year in payouts, air fares and admin costs.
TaxPayers' Alliance chief executive Matthew Elliott
stormed, "There should be extremely severe penalties
for people who rip off the asylum system in this way.
Taxpayers already contribute billions of pounds a year to
help asylum-seekers so when they abuse our help it is
doubly insulting."
Officials admitted at least 16,000 foreigners have cashed
in since the Assisted Voluntary Return programmes were
launched in 1999 and they revealed that grants to asylum
seekers who claim they want to leave the UK will rise by
£500 this year to a maximum of £3,500. At present, the
overall cost of the programmes would be enough to pay for
2,000 new teachers, nurses or cops. At least 300 people
have already been caught returning to Britain to try to
get another pay-off under their real names and the Home
Office has no idea how many more have sneaked back into
the country with new identities. Incredibly, 200 of the
300 who were caught were later allowed to stay in the
country.
Many are lured here by the chance of collecting the
£3,500 bribe, a fortune in the Third World, once they
have registered as asylum seekers. Some are even planning
second visits to the UK. Afghan Ali Hussein lived in
Hounslow, west London, for six months on his first trip
here but his application to stay in the UK was rejected
and he was paid to go home. As he waited in Calais for
another bite of the cherry he said, "I was very
pleased about that and it made me want to come back. Why
not? I will use a different story, and if that fails, I
will get more money when I am sent home."
The benefits are paid out under a string of different
Government schemes. The biggest is the Voluntary Assisted
Return and Reintegration Programme, which is available to
asylum seekers waiting for a Home Office decision or
appealing against deportation. Other schemes include
AVRIM, Assisted Voluntary Return of Irregular Migrants,
which is aimed at the victims of people-traffickers and
illegal immigrants who have been smuggled into Britain.
The handouts are paid to individuals in a £500 cash lump
sum at a UK airport. Another £3000 is dished out in cash
and benefits once they are back home. It includes
educational and business help.
Whitehall chiefs insist this is cheaper than the £11,000
it costs to forcibly repatriate a failed asylum seeker.
The Home Office had tried to crack down on abuses two
years ago by banning anyone from making two claims for a
deportation bribe. But asylum seekers simply bought
themselves a new identity before arriving in Britain, and
claimed under a different name. A Home Office spokesman
said, "Removals are always carried out at the lowest
cost so we promote voluntary returns as a cost-effective
alternative to forced removal. This is better for the
deportee and we provide assistance for those who are
willing to return to their own country. Any individual
who is not in need of international protection should be
expected to leave the UK." (Source: Sunday People, Mar/07)
<<<
Prev
|
|
|