DRI FAILURE
Derby's accident and emergency department failed
to meet the Government's four-hour waiting target
in June 2003. In March, the Government stated
that 90% of all patients should be seen and
treated within four hours. In June, 81%, or 5,855
of the 7,238 people who went to the department at
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, were seen and treated
within four hours. |
NO DOCTOR ON DUTY
A pensioner who crashed in a hospital car park
was rushed to A&E 20 miles away because there
was no doctor on duty to treat her.
The 79-year-old hit a tree at Westmorland General
Hospital in Kendal, Cumbria, but instead of being
stretchered a few yards, paramedics took her on a
25-minute trip to Royal Lancaster Infirmary.
(Source: Sunday People, Oct/07) |
|
|
A & E
The Ambulance
service is being paid bonuses for not taking patients to
hospital in a bid to help the NHS hit targets. NHS
managers have agreed to pay £38 for every casualty that
ambulance staff "keep out of A&E departments
after a 999 call has been made. The tactic is part of an
attempt to manage increasing demand for emergency care
amid failings in the GP out-of-hours system. Staff at
Britain's largest ambulance service have been encouraged
to maximise the organisation's income, by securing
payments for diverting patients to telephone helplines.
The bonuses are among dozens of schemes being tried out
by ambulance trusts across the country as they attempt to
improve their emergency response times and help A&E
departments meet controversial targets to treat all
patients within four hours of arrival. Another plan
uncovered would see thousands of 999 calls currently
classed as urgent downgraded so that callers receive
telephone advice instead of an ambulance response. The
changes were due to be introduced across the country, but
the Government committee governing ambulances has delayed
its decision amid safety concerns.
An investigation was launched at the ambulance trust
piloting the scheme following the death of a man whose
case was referred for telephone advice when an ambulance
should have been immediately dispatched. Dozens of
Primary Care Trusts in London are now paying the
capital's ambulance service a £38 bonus for each patient
crews do not send to hospital. While the maximum amount
of money the ambulance service can make from the scheme
is "capped," board papers suggest increasing
the number of patients diverted from hospital by 20% a
year "in order to reach the maximum level of funding
available".
In the current financial year, London Ambulance Service
has made £850,000 through the scheme. Earlier this
month, ambulance services in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire,
Hampshire and Oxfordshire abandoned plans to reward crews
with shopping vouchers if they sent patients to a GP,
instead of taking them to hospital. South Central
Ambulance Service had offered paramedics raffle tickets
to win £200 of store coupons if they used the GP
referral scheme, but dropped the plans following fury
from crews.
Jonathan Fox, from the Association of Professional
Ambulance Personnel said the use of financial inducements
for individuals or organisations was too dangerous. The
paramedic said, "Trusts simply shouldn't put
finances ahead of the clinical need of the patient; it is
too risky and puts too much pressure on staff. Time and
time again we come across incidents where red flags that
a patient's situation is life-threatening are missed. Not
every patient sent to hospital needs to be there, but
paramedics need to take decisions based on what is best
for the person they are treating, not the finances of
their trust."
London introduced the bonus payments ahead of a pilot
scheme to downgrade more than a dozen categories of calls
currently classed as urgent and requiring a "blue
light ambulance". Since October, calls, including
those involving stab victims and people suffering
breathing difficulties, have been downgraded by London
Ambulance Service. More than a dozen types of medical
crisis currently designated as urgent, and requiring a
blue light ambulance within 19 minutes are instead either
passed to telephone advisers or phoned back within 15
minutes of dialling 999.
A report by the ambulance trust on the pilot scheme,
which was written last July says, "Inevitably
utilising telephone triage and advice rather than the
dispatch of an ambulance may involve an increased
risk". The paper concludes that the level of danger
is acceptable, but says the scheme should be supported by
a "communication strategy" to make staff and
public aware of the new response to emergency calls, and
"remove the potential for disappointment". The
ambulance trust refused to disclose details of the 13
categories downgraded. (Source: Daily Telegraph, Mar/10)
Hospital A&E departments are turning
away patients who might die, because they are too
expensive to treat. It means ambulances carrying
critically ill patients from 999 calls must travel
further, because crews know the nearest hospital trust
will not take them. With the average A&E admission
costing £86, hospitals do not want to bear the £300
cost of those with life-threatening conditions. Health
Department figures show the number of casualty units
taking the most dangerously ill has fallen by 25% since
Labour came to power.
Emergency units are given a set sum by the Government, no
matter how many patients they treat, and routinely go
over budget. But as the NHS ran up debts of more than
£1billion, savings had to be made. A Health Department
spokes man said, "Life-threatening emergencies often
require a wide range of specialist services. It can be
appropriate to concentrate major services on one site,
rather than having multiple sites." Other figures
show the number of hospital beds is also down. In 2003
there were 399 per 100,000 people. That fell to 376 in
2006. (Source: Sunday People, Jun/07)
The quality of care given by Derby's
accident and emergency services has been ranked as the
second worst in the region. The findings were revealed in
a report by the Healthcare Commission, which assessed 170
of the country's 202 A&E departments, including
Derbyshire Royal Infirmary and Derbyshire Children's
Hospital's emergency department. The health watchdog
checked hospitals on the length of time taken to give
pain relief to children and patients with broken hips, as
well as when tests on patients with paracetamol overdoses
were given.
The findings, which are based on figures between 2003 and
2005, also looked at the waiting times and the
cleanliness at each hospital. In Derby, 38% of children
who were in moderate to severe pain were given pain
relief within an hour of arriving at A&E, the
second-worst performance of seven hospitals in the Trent
region. Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Royal Hospital
came top with 96%. Just over a third of A&E patients
with broken hips were given pain relief within an hour,
again placing the DRI second from bottom of the seven
hospitals.
Around 10% of patients were found to have spent four
hours or more in A&E between April and June 2004 but
the department, which sees 80,000 patients a year, came
top for cleanliness, scoring 100%. Kay Fawcett, the Derby
Hospital NHS Foundation Trust's director of nursing, said
that the results were "very disappointing" and
that improvements had included introducing a new
treatment guide for A&E nursing staff, allowing
nurses to give patients painkillers which doctors then
confirmed. Also, children are now being given painkillers
as nasal drops to prevent them failing to say how much
pain they are in to avoid injections. (Source: Derby Evening Telegraph)
|
|
|